Chapter 3 Exploratory, Descriptive, and Causal Research Flashcards
Exploratory
major emphasis: gaining ideas and insights.
fast, cheap , easy but don’t offer the why
Exploratory: conducted to provide a better understanding of the situation. It isn’t designed to come up with final answers or decisions.
oResearchers hope to produce hypotheses about what is going on in a situation.
qualitative
o o Can provide rich, meaningful info or definitive explanations for particular individuals.Shouldn’t be expected to provide answers to the decision problem that you are attempting to solve for a client.
(can’t confirm or reject the hypothesis with exploratory research, that job is left for descriptive and causal research (more quantitative))
involves only a relatively small group of people, these people are almost never randomly selected to participate.
Types of Exploratory
- Literature search
- Depth interviews
- Focus groups
- Case analyses
Exploratory vs Descriptive
Exploratory is flexible in nature and descriptive is not.
descriptive vs caual
Descriptive is fine for testing hypothesis about relationships between variables, but we nee causal designs for testing cause and effect relationships.
Focus Groups
2 pitfalls: easy for managers to see what they expect to see in focus group results
2. it should not be expected to deliver final results or answers to decision problems
Descriptive Research
describe the characteristics of certain groups
determine the properties of people who behave in a certain way
make specific predictions
determine relationships between variables
attempt to answer 5WH
longitudinal-continuous or discontinuous panel
cross sectional - sample survey
Causal Research
•Causal: one thing leads to the occurrence of another
•Condition X causes event Y
•Work toward establishing possible causal relationships through the use of experiments
Experiments used to isolate relationships between independent and dependent (Y)
•Basic point: change the levels of one or more X variables and examine the resulting impact on Y variables.
Descriptive is fine for testing hypothesis about relationships between variables, but we nee causal designs for testing cause and effect relationships.
•Experiment can provide more convincing evidence because of the control it gives investigators.
oLaboratory experiments: create a situation with exact conditions in order to control, but less real.
o Field experiment: conducted in realistic situation but less control
Market Testing
controlled experiemnt done in limited but carefully selected sector of the maketplace
Types of Test Market
standard: normal distribution channels
controlled- guaranteed distribution, conducted by outside service
simulated: consumer rating and other info fed into a computer model and then makes projection about likely level of sales.
Focus Groups vs Depth Interviews
Group interaction is the key aspect focus groups interviews from depth interviews, are conducted with one respondent at a time.
responses are often more spontaneous and less conventional than they might be in an interview.
focus groups are less expensive to carry out than in depth interviews, but still expensive.
ned an experienced moderator and an experienced interviewer.
both can be effective for exploratory research.
Depth Interviews
interviews with people knowledgeable about the general subject being investigated.
Used to tap the knowledge and experience of those with info relevant to the problem or opportunity at hand.
Series of depth interviews can be expensive, as well trained interviewers command high salaries. Data collection is slow but it can yield important insights and more often than not is worth the effort.
Can interview anyone with relevant info
cross sectional Study
drawing a sample of elements from the pop of interest.
ex. sample survey
Longitudinal study
panel which is a fixed sample of elements. ie. continuous and discontinuous panels.
Descriptive Study is concerned with
determining the frequency with which something occurs
one of the quickest and most economical ways to discover hypotheses is through
a literature search