chapter 3 (continued) Flashcards
neural convergence/convergence for short
when a number of neurons synapse onto a single neuron - a lot of convergence happens in the retina because the eye has 126 million photoreceptors but only 1 million ganglion cells
rod convergence
many many rods converge onto a single ganglion - about 120 rods to 1 ganglion - this makes rods very sensitive because it takes less incoming light to stimulate the ganglion cell since that light is received by many rods all converging onto the ganglion
cone convergence
very few cones converge onto a single ganglion - about 6-1 outside the fovea and 1-1 inside the fovea - less convergence means that cones have very high acuity since as opposed to rods, each cone stimulates its own ganglion cell, meaning when that cell fires, we know exactly where the signal is coming from (whereas in rods, any number of rods could fire the same ganglion)
receptive field
each ganglion cell responds to stimuli in specific parts of the retina - found by hartline studying single ganglion cells in the opened eye cup - retina of a frog - found that cells only responded when a specific area of the retina was stimulated
centre surround receptive fields
receptive fields that respond differently to light in their centre than light in the surrounding area - can be excitatory centre, inhibitory surround or inhibitory centre, excitatory surround
excitatory area
area of the receptive that increases firing - can be either centre or surround
inhibitory area
area of the receptive field that inhibits firing - can be either centre or surround
centre surround antagonism
stimulating centre and surround areas simulateously decreases responding of the neuron, compared to stimulating the excitatory area alone - this is because one area is inhbitory and one is excitatory so they cancel each other out
lateral inhibition
inhibition that is transmitted across the retina (by horizontal and amacrine cells) happens when excitatory synapses in horizontal and amacrine cells have inhibitory synapses on downstream cells
cell example of lateral inhibition
neural circuit in which all receptors are excitatory and the receptors on the surround converge on neurons that have inhibitory lateral connections to one central neuron that sums all the responses - when light hits the centre, the receptors activate the centre neuron (excitatory) but when light hits the surround the surround neurons activate - when these neurons are excited they inhibit the centre neuron that they are connected to, and decrease the overall response -
edge enhancement
an increase in perceived contrast at border between regions of the visual field - edges look more distinct so we can see them more easily
chevreul illusion
perceived light and dark bands at the border between two colours of contrasting lightness that makes the edge between the colours look sharper - this is not present in the physical stimuli
Mach bands
light and dark bands created at fuzzy borders - gradual transition from light to dark
how do centre surround fields in ganglion cells explain the edge enhancement in the chevreul and mach illusions?
when we look at two areas of light vs dark next to eachother, different ganglion cells receive different input - some only receive input from the light area, and some from the dark. In centre surround ganglion cells, the cells that receive input from the light side are more inhbiited because their entire field is illuminated, including the inhibitory surround field. cells on the border are slightly less inhibited, because part of their inhibitory field is in the dark side, not illuminated, resulting in a light band on the border. cells that receive input from the dark side are less inhibited because none of their receptive area is illuminated. cells on the border of the dark side are slightly more inhbited, because part of their inhibitory surround is in the lighter region, resulting in a dark band on the border
**all cells have baseline firing*
preferential looking (PL) technique
test of infant visual acuity measured by how long infants look at stimuli - we assume that if an infant looks preferentially at one of two stimuli, they can tell the difference between them, whereas, if they look at both stimuli equally we assume they cannot tell the difference