Chapter 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Variable

A

Something that changes or varies, so it needs to have at least two levels or values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Constant

A

Does not vary, stays the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Measured variable

A

Levels that are observed and recorded by the researcher

Height, IQ, gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Manipulated variable

A

Researcher controls a variable, usually by assigning participants to different levels of that variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conceptual variable

A

Abstract, theoretical concepts such as “infant temperament” and “anxiety”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Operational variables

A

In order to test their hypothesis with empirical data

To operationalize is to turn a conceptual definition into a measured or manipulated variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Claim

A

An argument someone is trying to make

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Frequency claim

A

One variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Association claim

A

Two variables that are related

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Casual claim

A

Two variables, one of which causes the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Positive association

A

High scores on one variable are associated with high scores on another variable or low scores on one variable are associated with low scores on another variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Casual claim

A

One of the variables is responsible for changing the other
One measured variable and one manipulated variable
The two variables convey
Contains tentative language (could, may, suggest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Construct validity

A

the degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring
How well a conceptual variable is operationalized.
The extent to which the operational variables in a study are a good approximation if the conceptual variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

External validity

A

The extent to which the results of a study generalize to some larger population, as well as to other times or situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Statistical validity

A

The extent to which the data support the conclusions. Important to ask about the strength of an association and its statistical significance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Internal validity

A

In a relationship between one variable (A) and another (B), the extent to which A, rather than some other variable (C), is responsible for B

17
Q

Type I error

A

False positive, a study might mistakenly conclude that there is an association between two variables in their sample when there actually is no association in the population.

18
Q

Type II error

A

A “miss”
A study might mistakenly conclude from a sample that there is no association between two variables when there actually is an association in the population

19
Q

Covariance

A

This simply means that two variables are related. Association claims fulfill the criterion

20
Q

Temporal precedence

A

One variable comes before the other variable in time.

21
Q

Internal validity

A

Also known as the third-variable criterion

A study would be able to eliminate alternative explanation. In other words, variable A is the only thing that changed.

22
Q

Independent variable

A

Manipulated or variable (cause) in an experiment

23
Q

Dependent variable

A
Measured variable (effect) in an experiment
IQ
24
Q

Random assignment

A

A method of assigning participants to levels of the independent such that each group is similar as possible
Flipping a coin or rolling a dice
Increases internal validity by controlling for potential alternative explanations