Chapter 3 Flashcards
Two kinds of literature review
First
Goes along with the initial search for research ideas, because thats when you browse through piece if work and judge which ones are relevant and which ones are not
Second, known as critical review
Able to show the significance of a research project it is necessary to understand the subject field and it concept, ideas and key theories,
‘Critically reviewing literature’ if they choose pieces of literature that are relevant for research
Critical review
-be a constructively analysis that critically develops a transparent argument about what the chosen literature tells you about a research question
Not simply summarize, what the piece is about
Necessary to evaluate what is significant to the research project and what is not
Goal of critical review
-enables you to generate the foundation on which a research is based
Deductive approach, develop a theoretical or conceptual framework and you test afterwards using data
Inductive approach, analyses the collected data to subsequently develop theories from them and relate them to the literature
Difference, inductive, you dont start with predetermined theories and conceptual framework
Three ways of using literature
1 using literature in the initial stages of a research, when making research proposal
2 using literature to provide the theoretical framework and context
3 to help place research findings within the wider body of knowledge
Purpose of your review
- refine research questions further
- highlight research possibilities
- discover recommendation for further
- avoid repeating work
- sample current opinions in eg paper
- discover/provide insight
Literature review
Review in which one makes reasoned judgement about the value of pieces of literature
Necessary to:
-organize valuable ideas and findings
Critical review is succesful
If
It will provide new insights about subject area that no one has ever thought about
Necessary to show, how new findings and developed theories relate to literature about your subject to demonstrate that you are familiar with what has already been said about the subject
Critical view of your reading
-Previewing
Browsing the text to found out whats its purpose
-Annotating
Conducting a analogue with yourself, the author and the issues at stake
-Summarizing
Able to explain/state the text in your own word
-Comparing and contrasting
How has your thinking been altered by this reading
-Use your research question
Qs which you asked yourself during reading which are linked to your research questions
Content of critical review
Eventually have to appear in a project report,
Has to include an evaluation of the research that has already been done in the subject area, demonstrate and discuss the relationship between published research finding and refer yo the literature in which they were reported
Present the keypoints and trends in a structured way and show relationship with the research, by doing this the readers will have background knowledge to the research qs
Content of a critical review one needs to:
- include key academic theories within the chosen research area
- demonstrate that your knowledge of chosen area is up to date
- through clear referencing, so they can find the original publication which you cite
Four aspects of a critical approch
Critique of rhetoric
Critique of tradition
Critique of authority
Critique of objectivity
Critique of rhetoric
Means appraising or evaluating a problem with good and effective use of language.
Being critical also means making a clear and justified analysis of the key literature or a research project.
For your review to be critical, you will need to have shown critical judgement
Literature review
A literature review is a critical analysis and description of what other have written.
Helpful to address to literature review as a discussion of how far existing literature goes in answering the chosen research questions.
-should point out the limitations of the existing literature
Three common review structures
One single chapter
A series of chapters
Throughout the project report while tackling various issues
Review should be a funnel in which you
1 start at a general level and narrow it down to research questions and objectives
2 provide a brief overview of key ideas and themes
3 summarise, compare and contrast research of the key writers
4 narrow down to highlight research most relevant to the research
5 provide detailed findings and show how they are related to the literature
6 highlight aspects, where your research is providing new insights
7 lead the reader to subsequent sections of your project