Chapter 24 Flashcards
Overview
• 46 states and District of Columbia impose a tax based on a C corp’s taxable income
– Majority of states “piggyback” onto Federal income tax base
• Essentially, they have adopted part or all of the Federal tax provisions
• In more than 40 of those states, the starting point in computing the tax base is taxable income as reflected on the Federal corporate income tax return (Form 1120)
State Modifications
• Federal taxable income generally is used as the starting point in computing the state’s income tax base
– State adjustments or modifications often are made to Federal taxable income to:
• Reflect differences between state and Federal tax statutes
• Remove income that a state is constitutionally prohibited from taxing
Common State Additions (slide 1 of 3)
• Interest income on state/municipal obligations and other interest income exempt from Federal income tax
– May exclude interest income on obligations within that state to encourage investment in in-state bonds
Common State Additions (slide 2 of 3)
• State income taxes deducted on Federal return
– Includes franchise taxes based on income
• Federal depreciation in excess of amount allowed by state (if depreciation systems differ)
Common State Additions (slide 3 of 3)
- State gain in excess of Federal gain on assets; Federal loss in excess of state loss on assets
- Adjustments to amounts under Federal elections
- Federal net operating loss deduction
Common State Subtractions(slide 1 of 3)
• Interest on U.S. obligations to extent included in Federal taxable income
– States cannot impose income tax on income from U.S. obligations, but may assess income-based franchise tax
• State depreciation in excess of Federal (if depreciation systems differ)
Common State Subtractions(slide 2 of 3)
- Federal gain in excess of state gain on assets; State loss in excess of Federal loss of assets
- Adjustments to amounts under Federal elections
Common State Subtractions(slide 3 of 3)
- State Net Operating Loss Deduction
- Dividends received from certain out-of-state corps to extent included in Federal return
- Federal income taxes paid
UDITPA and the Multistate Tax Commission
- Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA) is a model law relating to assignment of income among states for multistate corps
- Many states have adopted UDITPA either by joining the Multistate Tax Compact or modeling their laws after UDITPA
Nexus for Income Tax Purposes (slide 1 of 2)
• Nexus is the degree of business activity which must be present before a state can impose tax on an out-of-state entity’s income
• Sufficient nexus typically exists if:
– Income is derived from within state
– Property is owned or leased in state
– Persons are employed in state
– Physical or financial capital is located in state
Nexus for Income Tax Purposes (slide 2 of 2)
- No nexus if only “connection” to state is solicitation for sale of tangible personal property, with orders sent outside state for approval and shipping to customer (Public Law 86-272)
- Sales tax can still apply
Independent Contractors
• May generally engage in the following activities without establishing nexus for the company: – Solicit sales – Make sales – Maintain sales office • Source: Public law 86-272
Allocation and Apportionment of Income (slide 1 of 3)
• Apportionment is the means by which business income is divided among states in which it conducts business
– Corp determines net income for the company as a whole and then apportions some to a given state, according to an approved formula
Allocation and Apportionment of Income (slide 2 of 3)
- Allocation is a method used to directly assign specific components of a corp’s income, net of related expenses, to a specific state
- Allocable income generally includes:
- Income or loss from sale of nonbusiness property
- Income or losses from rents or royalties from nonbusiness real or tangible personal property
Allocation and Apportionment of Income (slide 3 of 3)
• Typically, allocable income (loss) is removed from corporate net income before the state’s apportionment formula is applied
– Nonapportionable income (loss) assigned to a state is then combined with income apportionable to the state to arrive at total income subject to tax in the state
Apportionment Procedure
•Business incomeis assigned to states using an apportionment formula
– Business income arises from the regular course of business
• Integral part of taxpayer’s regular business
•Nonapportionable incomeis allocated to the state in which the income-producing asset is located. It generally does not relate to the entity’s business activities.
Apportionment Factors
• Apportionment formulas vary among states
– Traditionally, states use a three-factor formula that equally weights sales, property, and payroll
– Many states use a modified formula where sales factor receives a larger weight
• Tends to pull larger amount of out-of state corporation’s income into the state
• May provide tax relief to corps domiciled in the state
Sales Factor (slide 1 of 3)
• Sales factor is a fraction
– Numerator is corp’s sales in the state
– Denominator is corp’s total sales everywhere
• Most states follow UDITPA’s “ultimate destination concept”
– Tangible asset sales are assumed to take place at point of delivery, not where shipping originates
• About 20 states have adopted market-sourcing rules, where the sale of services is sourced to the customer’s state
Sales Factor (slide 2 of 3)
– Sales to the US Government –
• Because the U.S. government is present in every state, the ultimate destination concept becomes difficult to use.
• Accordingly, sales to the Federal government are assigned to the sales factor numerator of the state from which the sale occurs
– Dock sales occur when delivery is taken at seller’s shipping dock
• Most states apply the destination test to dock sales
– If purchaser has out-of-state location to which it returns with the product, sale is assigned to purchaser’s state
Sales Factor (slide 3 of 3)
– Throwback rule
• If adopted by state, requires that out-of-state sales not subject to tax in destination state be pulled back into origination state
• Treats such sales as in-state sales of the origination state
• Also applies if purchaser is U.S. government
Payroll Factor (slide 1 of 4)
• Payroll factor is a fraction
– Numerator is compensation paid within a state
– Denominator is total compensation paid by the corporation
Payroll Factor (slide 2 of 4)
• Compensation includes wages, salaries, commissions, etc
– Amounts paid to independent contractors are excluded
– Some states exclude amounts paid to corporate officers
– Some states require that deferred compensation amounts be included in the payroll factor (e.g., 401(k) plans)
Payroll Factor (slide 3 of 4)
• Compensation of an employee is usually not split between states (unless employee is transferred or changes positions)
– Usually allocated to state in which services are primarily performed
• If more than one state, attribute to:
– Employee’s base of operations, or, if none,
– Place where work is directed or controlled, or, if none,
– Employee’s state of residency
Payroll Factor (slide 4 of 4)
• Only compensation related to production of apportionable income is included in payroll factor
– In states that distinguish between apportionable and nonapportionable income, compensation related to nonapportionable income is not included
– Compensation related to both business and nonapportionalbe income is prorated between the two
Property Factor (slide 1 of 3)
• Property factor generally includes average value of real and tangible personal property owned or rented
– Numerator is amount used in the state
– Denominator is all of corp’s property owned or rented
Property Factor (slide 2 of 3)
• Property includes:
– Land, buildings, machinery, inventory, etc
– May include offshore property, outer space property (satellites), and partnership property
• Property in transit is included in numerator of destination state
Property Factor (slide 3 of 3)
• Property is typically valued at average original or historical cost plus additions and improvements
– Some states allow net book value or adjusted basis to be used
• Leased property, when included in the property factor, is valued at eight times its annual rental payments
Unitary Taxation (slide 1 of 2)
• Theory: operating divisions are interdependent so cannot be segregated into separate units
– Each unit deemed to contribute to overall profits
– Unitary theory ignores separate legal existence of companies: all combined for apportionment