Chapter 22 Flashcards

1
Q

On January 1, 2005, Lynn Corporation acquired equipment at a cost of $600,000. Lynn adopted the double-declining balance method of depreciation for this equipment and had been recording depreciation over an estimated life of eight years, with no residual value. At the beginning of 2008, a decision was made to change to the straight-line method of depreciation for this equipment. Assuming a 30% tax rate, the cumulative effect of this accounting change on beginning retained earnings, net of tax, is

A

$0, No cumulative effect; handle prospectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

On January 1, 2005, Foley Corporation acquired machinery at a cost of $250,000. Foley adopted the double-declining balance method of depreciation for this machinery and had been recording depreciation over an estimated useful life of ten years, with no residual value. At the beginning of 2008, a decision was made to change to the straight-line method of depreciation for the machinery. The depreciation expense to be recorded for the machinery in 2008 is (round to the nearest dollar)

A

$250,000 – [($250,000 × .2) + ($200,000 × .2) + ($160,000 × .2)] = $128,000
128,000 ÷ 7 = $18,286

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

On January 1, 2005, Baden Co., purchased a machine (its only depreciable asset) for $300,000. The machine has a five-year life, and no salvage value. Sum-of-the-years’-digits depreciation has been used for financial statement reporting and the elective straight-line method for income tax reporting. Effective January 1, 2008, for financial statement reporting, Baden decided to change to the straight-line method for depreciation of the machine. Assume that Baden can justify the change. Baden’s income before depreciation, before income taxes, and before the cumulative effect of the accounting change (if any), for the year ended December 31, 2008, is $250,000. The income tax rate for 2008, as well as for the years 2005-2007, is 30%. What amount should Baden report as net income for the year ended December 31, 2008?

A

[(5/15 + 4/15 + 3/15) × $300,000] = $240,000 (AD)
($300,000 – $240,000) = $60,000 (BV)
[$250,000 – ($60,000 ÷ 2)] × (1 – .3) = $154,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Waeglein Corporation purchased machinery on January 1, 2006 for $630,000. The company used the straight-line method and no salvage value to depreciate the asset for the first two years of its estimated six-year life. In 2008, Waeglein changed to the sum-of-the-years’-digits depreciation method for this asset. The following facts pertain:
- – 2006 – 2007
Straight Line – 105,000 – 105,000
Sum-of-the-years’ – 180,000 – 150,000

Waeglein is subject to a 40% tax rate. The cumulative effect of this accounting change on beginning retained earnings is

A

$0, No cumulative effect; handle prospectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Waeglein Corporation purchased machinery on January 1, 2006 for $630,000. The company used the straight-line method and no salvage value to depreciate the asset for the first two years of its estimated six-year life. In 2008, Waeglein changed to the sum-of-the-years’-digits depreciation method for this asset. The following facts pertain:
- – 2006 – 2007
Straight Line – 105,000 – 105,000
Sum-of-the-years’ – 180,000 – 150,000

The amount that Waeglein should report for depreciation expense on its 2008 income statement is

A

[$630,000 – ($105,000 + $105,000)] = $420,000
420,000 × 4/10 = $168,000.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

During 2008, a construction company changed from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion method for accounting purposes but not for tax purposes. Gross profit figures under both methods for the past three years appear below:
- – Completed – Percentage
2006 – 475,000 – 800,000
2007 – 625,000 – 950,000
2008 – 700,000 – 1,050,000
- – 1,800,000 – 2,800,000

Assuming an income tax rate of 40% for all years, the affect of this accounting change on prior periods should be reported by a credit of

A

[($800,000 + $950,000) – ($475,000 + $625,000)] × (1 – .40) = $390,000 on the 2008 retained earnings statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

On January 1, 2005, Wintz Corporation acquired machinery at a cost of $600,000. Wintz adopted the straight-line method of depreciation for this machine and had been recording depreciation over an estimated life of ten years, with no residual value. At the beginning of 2008, a decision was made to change to the double-declining balance method of depreciation for this machine
Assuming a 30% tax rate, the cumulative effect of this accounting change on beginning retained earnings, is

A

$0, No cumulative effect; handle prospectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

On January 1, 2005, Wintz Corporation acquired machinery at a cost of $600,000. Wintz adopted the straight-line method of depreciation for this machine and had been recording depreciation over an estimated life of ten years, with no residual value. At the beginning of 2008, a decision was made to change to the double-declining balance method of depreciation for this machine
The amount that Wintz should record as depreciation expense for 2008 is

A

{($600,000 – [($600,000 ÷ 10) × 3]} ÷ 7 × 2 = $120,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

On December 31, 2008 Kean Company changed its method of accounting for inventory from weighted average cost method to the FIFO method. This change caused the 2008 beginning inventory to increase by $420,000. The cumulative effect of this accounting change to be reported for the year ended 12/31/08, assuming a 40% tax rate, is

A

420,000 × (1 – .40) = $252,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Eaton Company began operations on January 1, 2007, and uses the FIFO method in costing its raw material inventory. Management is contemplating a change to the LIFO method and is interested in determining what effect such a change will have on net income. Accordingly, the following information has been developed:
Final Inventory – 2007 – 2008
FIFO – 640,000 – 712,000
LIFO – 560,000 – 636,000
Net Income (FIFO) – 980,000 – 1,080,000

Based on the above information, a change to the LIFO method in 2008 would result in net income for 2008 of

A

1,080,000 – ($712,000 – $636,000) = $1,004,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hannah Company began operations on January 1, 2007, and uses the FIFO method in costing its raw material inventory. Management is contemplating a change to the LIFO method and is interested in determining what effect such a change will have on net income. Accordingly, the following information has been developed:
Final Inventory – 2007 – 2008
FIFO – 320,000 – 360,000
LIFO – 240,000 – 300,000
Net Income (FIFO) – 500,000 – 600,000
Based upon the above information, a change to the LIFO method in 2008 would result in net income for 2008 of

A

600,000 – ($360,000 – $300,000) = $540,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Equipment was purchased at the beginning of 2005 for $204,000. At the time of its purchase, the equipment was estimated to have a useful life of six years and a salvage value of $24,000. The equipment was depreciated using the straight-line method of depreciation through 2008. At the beginning of 2008, the estimate of useful life was revised to a total life of eight years and the expected salvage value was changed to $15,000. The amount to be recorded for depreciation for 2008, reflecting these changes in estimates, is

A

204,000 – {[($204,000 – $24,000) ÷ 6] × 3} = $114,000
($114,000 – $15,000) ÷ (8 – 3) = $19,800

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Carey Company purchased a machine on January 1, 2005, for $300,000. At the date of acquisition, the machine had an estimated useful life of six years with no salvage. The machine is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. On January 1, 2008, Carey determined, as a result of additional information, that the machine had an estimated useful life of eight years from the date of acquisition with no salvage. An accounting change was made in 2008 to reflect this additional information.

Assume that the direct effects of this change are limited to the effect on depreciation and the related tax provision, and that the income tax rate was 30% in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008. What should be reported in Carey’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2008, as the cumulative effect on prior years of changing the estimated useful life of the machine?

A

$0, no cumulative effect, handle prospectively (change in estimate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Carey Company purchased a machine on January 1, 2005, for $300,000. At the date of acquisition, the machine had an estimated useful life of six years with no salvage. The machine is being depreciated on a straight-line basis. On January 1, 2008, Carey determined, as a result of additional information, that the machine had an estimated useful life of eight years from the date of acquisition with no salvage. An accounting change was made in 2008 to reflect this additional information.

What is the amount of depreciation expense on this machine that should be charged in Carey’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2008?

A

($300,000 ÷ 6) × 3 = $150,000
150,000 ÷ 5 = $30,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Washington Inc. is a calendar-year corporation. Its financial statements for the years ended 12/31/08 and 12/31/09 contained the following errors:
- – 2008 – 2009
Ending inventory – 15,000 overstatement – 24,000 understatement
Depreciation expense – 6,000 understatement – 12,000 overstatement

Assume that the 2008 errors were not corrected and that no errors occurred in 2007. By what amount will 2008 income before income taxes be overstated or understated?

A

15,000 + $6,000 = $21,000 overstatement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Washington Inc. is a calendar-year corporation. Its financial statements for the years ended 12/31/08 and 12/31/09 contained the following errors:
- – 2008 – 2009
Ending inventory – 15,000 overstatement – 24,000 understatement
Depreciation expense – 6,000 understatement – 12,000 overstatement

Assume that no correcting entries were made at 12/31/08, or 12/31/09. Ignoring income taxes, by how much will retained earnings at 12/31/09 be overstated or understated?

A

24,000 + $6,000 = $30,000 understatement

16
Q

Rensing Company’s December 31 year-end financial statements contained the following errors:
- – 12/31/07 – 12/31/08
Ending inventory – 7,500 understated – 11,000 overstated
Depreciation expense – 2,000 understated - –

An insurance premium of $18,000 was prepaid in 2007 covering the years 2007, 2008, and 2009. The prepayment was recorded with a debit to insurance expense. In addition, on December 31, 2008, fully depreciated machinery was sold for $9,500 cash, but the sale was not recorded until 2009. There were no other errors during 2008 or 2009 and no corrections have been made for any of the errors. Ignore income tax considerations.

What is the total net effect of the errors on Rensing’s 2008 net income?

A

7,500 (o) + $11,000 (o) + $6,000 (o) – $9,500 (u) = $15,000 (o).

17
Q

Rensing Company’s December 31 year-end financial statements contained the following errors:
- – 12/31/07 – 12/31/08
Ending inventory – 7,500 understated – 11,000 overstated
Depreciation expense – 2,000 understated - –

An insurance premium of $18,000 was prepaid in 2007 covering the years 2007, 2008, and 2009. The prepayment was recorded with a debit to insurance expense. In addition, on December 31, 2008, fully depreciated machinery was sold for $9,500 cash, but the sale was not recorded until 2009. There were no other errors during 2008 or 2009 and no corrections have been made for any of the errors. Ignore income tax considerations.

What is the total net effect of the errors on the amount of Rensing’s working capital at December 31, 2008?

A

11,000 (o) – $6,000 (u) – $9,500 (u) = $4,500 (u)

18
Q

Rensing Company’s December 31 year-end financial statements contained the following errors:
- – 12/31/07 – 12/31/08
Ending inventory – 7,500 understated – 11,000 overstated
Depreciation expense – 2,000 understated - –

An insurance premium of $18,000 was prepaid in 2007 covering the years 2007, 2008, and 2009. The prepayment was recorded with a debit to insurance expense. In addition, on December 31, 2008, fully depreciated machinery was sold for $9,500 cash, but the sale was not recorded until 2009. There were no other errors during 2008 or 2009 and no corrections have been made for any of the errors. Ignore income tax considerations.

What is the total effect of the errors on the balance of Rensing’s retained earnings at December 31, 2008?

A

2,000 (o) + $11,000 (o) – $6,000 (u) – $9,500 (u) = $2,500 (u)

19
Q

Accrued salaries payable of $51,000 were not recorded at December 31, 2007. Office supplies on hand of $24,000 at December 31, 2008 were erroneously treated as expense instead of supplies inventory. Neither of these errors was discovered nor corrected. The effect of these two errors would cause

A

2008 net income to be understated $75,000 and December 31, 2008 retained earnings to be understated $24,000.

20
Q

Friend Co. began operations on January 1, 2007. Financial statements for 2007 and 2008 contained the following errors:
- –12/31/07 – 12/31/08
Ending inventory – 132,000 too high – 156,000 too low
Depreciation expense – 84,000 too high – —
Insurance expense – 60,000 too low – 60,000 too high
Prepaid insurance – 60,000 too high – —
In addition, on December 31, 2008 fully depreciated equipment was sold for $28,800, but the sale was not recorded until 2009. No corrections have been made for any of the errors. Ignore income tax considerations.

The total effect of the errors on Friend’s 2008 net income is

A

132,000 (u) + $156,000 (u) + $60,000 (u) + $28,800 (u) = $376,800 (u)

21
Q

Friend Co. began operations on January 1, 2007. Financial statements for 2007 and 2008 contained the following errors:
- –12/31/07 – 12/31/08
Ending inventory – 132,000 too high – 156,000 too low
Depreciation expense – 84,000 too high – —
Insurance expense – 60,000 too low – 60,000 too high
Prepaid insurance – 60,000 too high – —
In addition, on December 31, 2008 fully depreciated equipment was sold for $28,800, but the sale was not recorded until 2009. No corrections have been made for any of the errors. Ignore income tax considerations

The total effect of the errors on the balance of Friend’s retained earnings at December 31, 2008 is understated by

A

156,000 (u) + $84,000 (u) – $60,000 (o) + $60,000 (u) + $28,800 (u) = $268,800 (u)

22
Q

Friend Co. began operations on January 1, 2007. Financial statements for 2007 and 2008 contained the following errors:
- –12/31/07 – 12/31/08
Ending inventory – 132,000 too high – 156,000 too low
Depreciation expense – 84,000 too high – —
Insurance expense – 60,000 too low – 60,000 too high
Prepaid insurance – 60,000 too high – —
In addition, on December 31, 2008 fully depreciated equipment was sold for $28,800, but the sale was not recorded until 2009. No corrections have been made for any of the errors. Ignore income tax considerations.

The total effect of the errors on the amount of Friend’s working capital at December 31, 2008 is understated by

A

156,000 (u) + $28,800 (u) = $184,800 (u)

23
Q

Rice Co. purchased machinery that cost $810,000 on January 4, 2006. The entire cost was recorded as an expense. The machinery has a nine-year life and a $54,000 residual value. The error was discovered on December 20, 2008. Ignore income tax considerations.

Rice’s income statement for the year ended December 31, 2008, should show the cumulative effect of this error in the amount of

A

CE = $0, correction of error

24
Q

Rice Co. purchased machinery that cost $810,000 on January 4, 2006. The entire cost was recorded as an expense. The machinery has a nine-year life and a $54,000 residual value. The error was discovered on December 20, 2008. Ignore income tax considerations.

Before the correction was made, and before the books were closed on December 31, 2008, retained earnings was understated by

A

810,000 - (((810,000 - 54,000)/9) * 2) = 642,000

25
Q

Handy Company purchased equipment that cost $750,000 on January 1, 2006. The entire cost was recorded as an expense. The equipment had a nine-year life and a $30,000 residual value. Handy uses the straight-line method to account for depreciation expense. The error was discovered on December 10, 2008. Handy is subject to a 40 % tax rate.

Handy’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2006, was understated by

A

($750,000 – [($750,000 – $30,000) ÷ 9]) × (1 – .40) = $402,000

26
Q

Handy Company purchased equipment that cost $750,000 on January 1, 2006. The entire cost was recorded as an expense. The equipment had a nine-year life and a $30,000 residual value. Handy uses the straight-line method to account for depreciation expense. The error was discovered on December 10, 2008. Handy is subject to a 40 % tax rate.

Before the correction was made and before the books were closed on December 31, 2008, retained earnings was understated by

A

750,000 – [($750,000 – $30,000) ÷ 9 × 2] = $590,000
590,000 × (1 – .40) = $354,000