Chapter 2 The Research Enterprise in Psychology Flashcards
Research methods in psychology
science is similar to detective work
- promote the idea of curiosity
- skepticism
- open minded
The Scientific Process/Method:
- identify a question
- what do we want to learn about?
- ex/ why am I scared of clowns?
- Form a hypothesis
- what is our specific prediction?
- ex/ because of something that happened in my past. I.e. trauma
- Gather information
- ex/ sending emails, anything to gather information
- Analyze the data
- what can we conclude?
- conclusion is the answer to the question
- what can we conclude?
theory
a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offer to explain phenomena
- ex/ why are people scared of this? (general principle)
- ex/ why do I see the sky as blue? (could be theory because it applies to multiple people/things)
What is a good theory?
- organize information in a meaningful way
- is testable (i.e., is ‘disprovable’)
- In science you cannot prove anything correct. You do not prove in science, but you can disprove. Instead, you support ideas, and provide evidence towards ideas.
- predications are supported by research
- conforms to Law of Parsimony
- Occam’s Razor: if there is multiple explanations possible, then pick the simplest one
Trouble with Humans:
studying unobservable mental processes
studying humans
- Complexity - 500 million neurons in the brain
- Variability - every person is different
- Reactivity - reactions differ when observed vs not observed
Hindsight understading
after viewing a behaviour, propose an explanation that makes sense in that context
- what we think is going on
hypothesis-testing
test possible explanations through scientific method
- verifying if we’re right or not
operation definition:
- a description of a property in concrete, measurable terms
- basic procedure of how one can measure something
- ex/ how many licks does it take to reach the tootsie of a tootsie pop
- make sure it is replicable
- essentially, making sure you are measuring what you want to measure
- i.e., define what you are studying
descriptive research
describe behaviour in nature
2. e.g., case studies, surveys, naturalistic observation (*multiple choice)
case studie
- a method of gathering scientific knowledge by studying a single individual (n=1)
2. Not generalizable
3. Pro: important for testing particular theories and/or exceptional cases: e.g., H.M., Phineas Gauge
Sample survey research
a subject of individuals form the population
Representative sample
posses the important characteristics of the population in the same proportions. Data from representative sample are more likely to generalize to the larger population than data from a unrepresented sample.
Naturalistic Observation
observing people/animals in their natural environment, when they do NOT know they are being observed
1. ex/ it is NOT naturalistic observation to view animals in a zoo
One of the best ways to avoid demand characteristic
demand characteristics: someone behaves a certain way because they think that’s what you want
limits
experiment cannot inform a person that they are being observed.
1. cannot gain consent, ethical problem
things you CAN do
observing how many people at the mall has white shoes. Observe in a environment where people know they are being watched (cctvs) but does not know what is being recorded
things you CAN’T do
observing thoughts or emotions
Descriptive Research
describe bahaviour in nature
1. E.g., case studies, surveys, naturalistic observation
Correlational Research
ook at the relationships between two variables
1. are two variables related?
2. cannot tell if variable A causes variable B
correlation does not equal
casuation
Correlation
compare the pattern of variation in a series of measurements between variables
* E.g., Correlation between insults and favors
Types of Correlation:
postivie, perfect. negatvie
Perfect correlations
(r = +1 or -1). rare
Positive correlations
(0 < r -<- +1)
an increase in one variable relates to an increase in the other
* OR decrease = decrease!
* E.g., the more times you laugh at my jokes, the happier I feel OR age and height
Negative correlations
(-1 -<- r < 0)
an increase in one variable relates to a decrease in the other
* E.g., the faster you drive, the less time it takes to get somewhere
* No correlations between variables (r = 0)
Strength of Correlations
Denoted by the letter ‘r’
* indicates how related two variables are
* -1 < r < +1
<>(less than or)
ex/ which one is stronger? +.5 or =-.8?
-0.8 is closer to -1, than +0.5 to 1
Thus, -0.8 has a stronger correlation
the number closest to 1 is
the stronger correlation. you cannot go beyond 1
less variations =
strong correlation
average of all dots across the graph is
how you determine
1. use r values to calculate as graphs are difficult to read by itself
4. slope does not matter!
Benefits of Correlations
gvie idea which viariable to sue in research experiments. starting point.
if you cannot manipulate it
you cannot determine causality
the third variable problem
two variables may be related to be one another (are correlated) only because they are both causally related to a third variable
* ex/ x (exposure to media violence) <— z (lack of adult supervision) —> y (aggressiveness)
accounting for the third variable problem:
matched samples
* participants in two groups match
* has the same z score (i.e., exact same amount of adult supervision)
matched pairs
each participant matches another
* each participants matches another participant from another group, but the amount of score is the same
* i.e. Group 1: child A 20%, child B 91%, child C 40%
* Group 2: child A 20%, child B 91%, child C 40%
manipulation does not equal to
correlation. but is = causality