Chapter 2 (Frisch) Flashcards

1
Q

causality

A

whether research findings represent cause-and-effect associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

air pollution

A

associated with increasing urbanisation of developing regions
- exposure to tobacco smoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

toxic chemicals - pesticides, asbestos, lead, and mercury

A

implicated in cancer, adverse reproductive outcomes, nervous system impacts, and more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

epidemiology definition

A

concerned with the study of the distribution and determinants of health and diseases, morbidity, injuries, disability, and mortality in populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

environmental epidemiology definition

A

refers to the study of diseases and health conditions (occurring in the population) that are linked to environmental factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why is epidemiology important to the study of environmental health problems?

A
  1. many exposures and health effects associated with the environment occur at the population level
  2. the epidemiologic methods of natural experiments and observational techniques are appropriate
  3. the study designs used in epidemiological research can be applied directly to the study of environmental health issues
  4. epidemiology aids in the development of hypotheses and the study of causal relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what kind of study design does epidemiology usually take on?

A

observational study design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

descriptive epidemiology

A

refers to the depiction of the occurrence of disease in populations according to classification by person, place, and time variables
- provide information from setting priorities, identifying hazards, and formulating hypotheses for new occupational risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

analytic epidemiology

A

examines causal (etiologic) hypotheses regarding the association between exposures and health conditions
- planned examinations of causality and the natural history of disease
- employs both outcome and exposure variables
- takes advantage of naturally occurring situations or events in order to test causal hypotheses (natural experiments)
- example of this is John Snow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

prevalence

A

refers to the number of existing cases of or deaths from a disease or health condition in a population at some designated time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

point prevalence

A

refers to all cases of or deaths from a disease or health condition that exist at a particular point in time relative to a specific population from which the cases are derived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

incidence

A

refers to the occurrence of new disease or mortality within a defined period of observation (e.g., a week, month, year, etc) in a specified population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

incidence rate

A

the rate at which new events occur in population

IR = number of new cases over a time period / average population at risk during the same time period x multiple (e.g. 100,000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

incidence measures

A
  • central to the study of causal mechanisms with regard to how exposures affect health outcomes
  • describe the risks associated with certain exposures; they can be used to estimate in a population “the probability of someone in that population developing the disease during a specified period, conditional on not dying first from another disease”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case fatality rate (CFR)

A

provides a measure of the lethality of a disease, is defined as the number of deaths due to a specific disease within a specified time period divided by the number of cases of that disease during the same time period multiplied by 100

CFR (%) = number of deaths due to disease “X” / number of cases of disease “X” x 100 during a time period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hippocrates

A

expounded on the role of environmental factors such as water quality and the air in causing diseases
- produced a well known book on airs, waters, and places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Sir Percival Pott

A

London surgeon - he is thought to be the first individual to describe an environmental cause of cancer
- chimney sweeps

18
Q

John Snow

A

linked a cholera outbreak in London to contaminated water from the Thames River
- natural experiment

19
Q

Intervention study

A

is an investigation involving intentional change in some aspect of the status of the subjects
- RCT
- quasi-experiments

20
Q

quasi-experimental study

A

manipulation of exposure variable occurs, but individual subjects are not randomly allocated to the study conditions
- community trial

21
Q

case series study

A

information about patients who share a disease in common is gathered over time
- weakest for making causal assertions
- useful for developing hypotheses for further study

22
Q

cross-sectional study

A

examines the relationship between diseases and other variables of interest as they exist in a defined population at one particular time
- type of prevalence study
- make a one time assessment of the prevalence of disease in a sample that in most situations has been sampled randomly from the parent population of interest
- may be used to formulate hypotheses that can be followed up in analytic studies

23
Q

ecologic study

A

a study in which the units of analysis are populations or groups of people rather than individuals
- used to correlate air pollution with adverse health effects such as mortality, researcher measures the association between average exposure to air pollution within a census tract and the average mortality in that census tract
- big problem is uncontrollable factors

24
Q

case control study

A

subjects who participate in the study are defined on the basis of the presence or absence of an outcome of interest
- case and controls are generally matched by sex, age, race, etc
- exposure to factor is retro so it already occurred
- examine many potential exposures (advantage)
- examine only one or a few outcomes (disadvantage)

25
Q

odds ratio (OR)

A

the ratio of the odds in favour of exposure among the cases (A/C) to the odds in favour of exposure among non cases (the controls, B/D)
A/C / B/D or AD / BC
- an odds ratio of more than 1 suggests a positive association between the exposure and disease or other outcomes

26
Q

cohort study

A

classifies subjects according to their exposure to a factor of interest and then observes them over time to document the occurrence of new cases (incidence) of disease
- longitudinal design (follow subjects over time)
- evaluate many different outcomes (causes of death) but few exposures
- either prospective or retrospective

27
Q

Relative Risk (RR)

A

RR = incidence rate of a disease in an exposed group / incidence rate of the disease in a unexposed group

  • if RR is less than 1, the risk is lower among the exposed group
  • this level of risk (less than 1) sometimes is called a protective effect
28
Q

epidemiologic triangle

A

Host, agent, and environment (all in a triangle)
- provides a framework for the causation of a disease

29
Q

consistent association

A

is one that has been observed repeatedly

30
Q

specific association

A

is one that is constrained to a particular disease-exposure relationship
- a given disease results from a given exposure and not from other types of exposures

31
Q

temporality

A

observe the cause before the effect

32
Q

biological gradient

A

known as a dose-response curve which shows a linear trend in the association between exposure and disease

33
Q

plausibility

A

an association must be biologically plausible from the standpoint of contemporary biological knowledge

34
Q

coherence

A

suggests that the cause-and-effect interpretation of our data should not seriously conflict with the generally known facts of the natural history and biology of the disease

35
Q

bias

A

systematic deviation of results or inferences from truth, or processes leading to such deviation

36
Q

recall bias

A

refers to the fact that cases may remember an exposure more clearly than controls (in case-control studies)

37
Q

selection bias

A

bias in the effect of an exposure/disease that arises from the procedures used to select participants

38
Q

example of selection bias

A

Healthy worker effect
- observation that employed populations tend to have a lower mortality experience than the general population
- which may reduce the validity of exposure data when employed persons are chosen as research subjects in studies or occupational health

39
Q

confounding

A

Other outside variables of the study could have influenced the results
- associated with disease risk and produce a different distribution of outcomes in the exposure groups than in the comparison groups

40
Q

3 major requirements for the successful epidemiologic investigation of environmental exposures are?

A
  1. direct and accurate estimates of the exposures experienced by individual members of the study population
  2. direct and accurate determination of the disease status of individual members of the study population
  3. appropriate statistical summarisation and analysis of the individual data pertaining to disease and exposure
41
Q

latency period

A

refers to the time interval between initial exposure to a disease-causing agent and the appearance of a disease or its manifestations in the host

42
Q

characteristics, weaknesses, and strengths of environmental epidemiology

A

Characteristics:
- deals with non-disease effects
- involves numerous variables
- tends to be community specific
Weaknesses
- sample size is insufficient
- important variables “uncontrolled”
- exposure estimation is invalid
Strengths
- engages the real world
- unique perspective on disease/health
- basis for action despite ignorance of mechanism