Chapter 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Quantitative Skills

A
  • Five years of experience is typical. Underwriters must be able to use numbers to quantify losses over time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Loss Run

A

Is a summary or report of loss experience fro a risk over a specified period of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What a Loss Run Tells an Underwriter

A
  • Financial information, such as reserves and payments that can be used to determine the profitability of a risk.
  • Insight into a risk, such as the types and size of claims the account experiences.
  • Determines the acceptability of the account, as well as the needed premium and other conditions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Typical Captions on a Loss Run

A
  • Date of loss
  • Date reported
  • Type of loss (Auto, premises liability, products liability)
  • Description of loss
  • Location
  • Outstanding reserve
  • Paid
  • Incurred
  • Open, closed, re-opened
  • Date of closure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Date of Report

A
  • Can look for patterns of late reporting. Major gaps may arise because the insured tens to wait for small losses to become larger losses.
  • May give rise to anomalies in experience.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types, Description and Location of Loss

A
  • More detailed information should be requested on larger losses. Typically insurers have guidelines for the amounts in excess of a certain value.
  • Allow the underwriter to determine if losses are the type to be expected from this risk, and whether a certain type of loss is reoccurring because of the insured’s management not learning from experience.
  • Underwriter might wonder if the experience suggests and kinds of suspicious, or unexpected losses (moral hazards)
  • Frequency and loss severity. Change in this may alert to risk management being needed.
  • Large loss - will it occur again? Or is it highly unlikely?
  • Claim counts - have claims increased in the number of years? Decreased? What cause the change? Change in ops? Change in deductible?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outstanding Reserves

A
  • Open claims: If a renewal, may be comfortable knowing insurer’s reserve philosophy. If new business, may need to ask their claims department and ask for an estimate of how much a given open claim might settle for.
  • Underwriter could reach out to claims and see if they know anything about another insurer’s claims handling practices.
  • Longstanding reserves for smaller claims are unusual. Litigation?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Losses Incurred and Claims Paid

A
  • Underwriter needs to know whether loss reserves include deductibles, or is in net of them. If paid, has there been any change in the deductible level?
  • Do the figures include adjustment expenses? What is the split between the loss settlement and adjustment expenses (which include legal expenses).
  • Does anything seem odd about what figures are supplied?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Open and Closed Claims

A
  • When claims are open for a long time, an underwriter should be looking for anomalies.
  • Small first party property claims should only take 6-8 months to settle.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quantitative Skills

A
  • Assessment of risk is only in part a statistical analysis. Quantitative skills are also important.
  • Underwriters must go “beyond the book”, i.e. not strictly confine their analysis to mathematics.
  • Examples where using mathematical might not yield useful conclusions for an underwriter:
    1. Insufficient statistical data
    2. Familiarity with the industry (what to do in regards to slip and falls - junior underwriter vs. senior underwriter)
    3. Sufficient data but difficulty in comparing risks
    4. Statistical improbability of loss that does not rule out the possibility of it (i.e ruling out a large loss - floods)
    5. An absence of loss, yet an occurrence of some kind the underwriter should still know about (quirks or anomalies that have had some effect on the insured’s coverage - lessening of a deductible)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Skills

A
  • Losses must be analyzed for patters in the experience that will lead the underwriter to an assessment of the experience and a judgement about whether and how the risk could be made more acceptable.
  • Long lists of losses, underwriter should look at the root of those claims.
  • If a deductible is contemplated, the underwriter needs to adjust the claim payments for inflation and then apply the deductible to determine the impact it may have on claims.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Putting Numbers in Context

A

“Digging beneath the surface” allows the underwriter to assess statistical information in the context of actual events.

Ex. A building being declined for a one million dollar loss - what information may change their mind? An analysis must be done as the building may have previously not had sprinklers, but now does given the loss that occurred, making it highly unlikely for a fire loss to occur again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Undue Pessimism

A

Might incline an underwriter to consider a risk with no reported losses to decline the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Loss Development Factors

A

An underwriter must understand that those losses will continue to develop (ones that are reported), and there may have also been losses that have been incurred but not reported. Makes loss rating based only on losses reported merely provisional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

IBNR

A

Incurred but not reported (losses)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Undeveloped Numbers

A

Incurred numbers as of today (paid claims and outstanding reserves), and have not had development factors applied to reflect future changes in claims reported, reopened, and additional case reserves.

17
Q

Case Study - Loss Development Factors

A
  1. Underwriter must summarize the incurred losses
  2. Underwriter must calculate the incurred loss ratio (while looking at the earned premiums vs losses)
  3. Develop the incurred losses by applying a loss development factor (both for incurred losses, and by such measures as trend factors to adjust for closed claims for inflation).
  4. Trend factors must be applied first.
18
Q

Loss Development Factor (LDF)

A

Is a number applied to the losses evaluated at a certain time to project the amounts at which they will ultimately be settled.

Are derived from loss triangles.

19
Q

Loss Triangle

A
  • Groups losses by year over successive time periods to show a history of change in the amount of all losses.
  • This helps to estimate future losses.
  • Illustrates loss development.
  • Should represent one line of coverage only.
  • Can be created for reported losses, paid claims, claim counts.
20
Q

Accident Year

A

Matches all losses, regardless of when they were reported, to the 12 month period in which they occurred.

21
Q

Incurred Losses

A

The sum of paid claims and outstanding reserves.

22
Q

Link Ratio or Age-to-age Factor

A

Incremental development factor.

23
Q

Short Tail Claims

A

Losses that do not take a long time to report, develop or settle.

24
Q

Cumulative Factor or Age-to-ultimate Factor

A

A factor that can be applied to any evaluation period to project the ultimate settlement value.

25
Q

Long Tail Claims

A

Casualty claims (typically).

Larger loss development factors. Above 3.5

26
Q

Other Conclusions from Loss Triangles

A
  • Reporting patterns
  • Exposure units
  • Claims counts
  • Trends or issues
27
Q

Rating

A
  • Brings underwriters quantitative and qualitative skills together.
  • Computers may be able to carry out ratings for certain classes of business, an underwriter still needs to be able to be skilled in mathematics to see that some manual rates are more credible than others, and why.
  • Larger volumes typically have established rates (i.e. auto or homeowners policy). They typically have little deviation.
  • Underwriter may want to manually rate for larger, complex risks. Checking credibility will take mathematical skills.
28
Q

Pure Premium Rates

A

Can be calculated by using the developed losses to ultimate form, and the exposure base.

29
Q

Pure Premium

A

The premium required to match incurred losses, with no allowance for commissions, overhead, profit or investment income.

30
Q

Trend Factor

A

Is applied to the pure premium to determine overall premium.

31
Q

Median Accident Date

A

Is the date in the middle of a series of dates of loss, such that a number of dates of loss that preceded the median date is the same number of dates that follow it.

32
Q

Comparisons with Manual Rate

A
  • Manual rate reflects the average risk.
  • Can use the calculated rate against this manual rate to draw conclusions about whether the account we are considering is better or worse than the average risk in its class.
33
Q

Other Reasons for Rating Deviations

A
  • Risks in certain classes of business are individually rated because of their complexity and the need for underwriting judgement. Variations in perils and hazards.
  • An underwriter can start with a basic rate, then add loadings for features of a risk that make it more hazardous than the average in the class.
  • An underwriter may also apply deductions and credits for features that make the risk less hazardous than the average in that class.