Chapter 2 Flashcards
Cycle of the Scientific method in psychology
Research Literature><Research>Empirical study>Data Analysis>Conclusions>Publish Paper>Research Questions</Research>
Informal ideas
Are direct or indirect observations on behavior. It can be a real life observation while going on your day or something a newspaper says that you question. Note: Milgram’s famous study was prompted by Nazi’s saying they committed atrocities because they were only obeying orders
Practical Problems
That either impair human functionality in the environment or something you want to see improved .
Why read Previous Research other than learning
can help build studies based on already established work from people of expertise in the area. It can also help narrow down your topic to a specific degree to be researchable. Most common research ideas
Methods of finding previous research
- Professional Journals which have two types: Empirical research reports which is empirical studies and review articles which look at previously reviewed articles and present new ways to look at the results
- Theoretical articles which present a new theory
- Meta-analysis which is statistically studying what came before
- Double-blind peer review
Double-blind peer review
process of when an article is sent to a Journal to be published, it is sent to two or three experts who write a critical review of it but the reason its double-blind is because the reviewers do not know who the researcher is and vise versa
meta Analysis
Statistically studying what came before
Theoretical Articles
Articles that present a new theory
Two types of Professional Journals
- Empirical research reports which is empirical studies
- review articles which look at previously reviewed articles and present new ways to look at the results
Scholarly Books and their two types
are books written for other researchers,
a monograph is written by a single author or a small group of authors;
edited volumes is a single or small group of editors who recruit many authors to write a book with sometimes a different author per chapter
How many sources does a typical report have?
50
techniques for turning research ideas into empirical research questions
Asking about the causes and effects of behavior
What types of people or situations promote the behavior
Research abstracts and discussion sections of previous articles
refine what has already been researched
What makes a research question interesting?
When a question is in doubt
may answer a question
will advance the literature
answer a practical problem
Theory
A theory is a coherent explanation of one or more phenomena that has a lot of proof
Hypothesis
A hypothesis is a specific prediction about a new phenomena that you assume will be accurate.
techniques to generate a hypothesis
Analyze competing theories
thinking of if-then relationships
looking at previous research
Hypothetico-deductive model
Starting out with data and attempting to explain it based on what you know. Then make a prediction, then run an experiment and then revise the hypothesis based on the results.
Operational definition
A definition of a variable or precisely how it is to be measured. Such as taking depression and turning it into something that can be observed such as Becks depression inventory
Distinguish between lab studies, field studies, and field experiments.
Laboratory studies are done in the lab and field studies are done outside the lab. Lab studies have high internal validity (confidence in the causal relationship) because we can manipulate variables.
Field studies have high external validity (the degree we can generalize findings or circumstances) because we observe them in real-world settings
Filed experiments are experiments (variables manipulated) in the field
Standard deviation
average distance of scores from the mean
variance
Standard deviation squared
difference between descriptive and inferential statistics
Descriptive is about gaining data on phenomena
inferential is about drawing conclusions based on a sample
Type 1 error
false positive. When something is due to random chance even with the results concluded as statistically significant
Type II error
a missed opportunity. It is when a researcher concludes that their results are not statistically significant when in reality there is a real effect in the population and they just missed detecting it. Once again, these Type II errors are more likely to occur when the threshold is set too low (e.g., set at 1% instead of 5%) and/or when the sample was too small