Chapter 17: Relationship of Principal and Agent Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

legal relationship of principal and agent

A

involving an agent who is under the control of, and who is authorized to act on behalf of another person (a legal or natural person), the principal, which authority may include the authority to enter into contracts on behalf of the principal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

typically the principal is a …

A

legal entity (corporation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

typical layout of principal agent relationship

A
  • corporation is formed (principal)
  • corp’s affairs are hired by a board of directors (natural persons)
  • board elects officers who are agents of the corp
  • officers hire employees who as agents of the corp. conduct the business of the corp
  • 3rd parties come into contract with the corp through their interaction with he agents of the corp.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

utility of agency

A

multiply our economic activities by acting through others (our agents)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

master/servant relationship

A

servant under physical control of master-typical employment relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

employer/employee relationship

A

broad meaning-exact nature of relationship depends on facts and circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

independent contractor relationship

A

independent contractor (who may or may not be an agent) is not physically controlled by person who engages independent contractor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

master

A

a principal who employs an agent to perform service in his affairs and who controls or has the right to control the physical conduct of the other in the performance of the service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

servant

A

an agent employed by a master to perform service in his affairs whose physical conduct in the performance of the service is controlled or is subject to the right to control by the master

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

independent contractor

A

a person who contracts with another to do something for him but who is not controlled by theater nor subject to the other’s right to control with respect to his physical conduct in the performance of the undertaking (he may or may not be an agent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

scope of authority determination

A

relevant issue of whether contract is binding on principal or only on the agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

degree of control determination

A

relevant to issue of imputed tort liability-will tortuous acts of the sub. be imputed to the principal?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

does agency have to be contractual?

A

no-it could be non contractual (running and errand)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

creation of agency by expressed or implied agreement

A

-results in a grant of actual authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

two aspects of actual authority

A
  • express authority

- implied authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

express authority

A

defined by the spoken or written word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

implied authority

A

to do what is customary and in addition to express authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

apparent agency

A

the principal creates impression in midshipmen’s of third parties that an agency exists or that an agent has a certain scope of authority

19
Q

who can create apparent agency?

A

principals through their actions -agents do not

20
Q

what does the 3rd party think of the agent (when apparent authority exists)

A
  • apparent authority may coincide with agent’s actual authority
  • apparent authority may exceed/be less than agents actual authority
  • the alleged agent may not in fact be an agent at all
21
Q

what is the issue on the agent’s authority?

A

are the contracts binding on the principal? of course 3rd parties want the contracts to be binding on the principal because they then have greater security that the contract will, in fact be formed

22
Q

what do 3rd parties have a right to believe about an agent’s scope of authority?

A
  1. agent has usual and customary grant of authority given the nature of the agency relationship
  2. 3rd parties not bound by “secret” limitations unless they know of them
23
Q

who bears the risk that no agency in fact exists?

A
  • the third party bears the risk that the agent is not really an agent
  • this is true unless apparent authority has been created by principal-then agent has apparent authority and principal will be bound
24
Q

when is the principal liable for the contract?

A

if the contract was entered into within scope of authority as reasonably perceived by third party-regardless of whether agent had actual authority

25
Q

when can agent be liable for contracts entered into on behalf of a principal?

A
  • exceeds authority (liable to principal or 3rd party?)
  • agent acts for nonexistent or incompetent principal (president of co. that hasn’t formed yet)
  • agent acts for partially disclosed principal (3rd party knows of agent but not principal)
  • agent acts as for undisclosed principal (3rd party doesn’t know agent is an agent)
  • agent has no actual authority
26
Q

agent acts as for undisclosed principal

A

(3rd party doesn’t know agent is an agent)

27
Q

agent acts for partially disclosed principal

A

(3rd party knows of agent but not principal)

28
Q

agent acts for nonexistent or incompetent principal

A

(sign a letter as president of co. that hasn’t formed yet)

29
Q

agent has no actual authority

A
  • principal not liable to 3rd party (unless agent has apparent authority)
  • agent potentially liable to 3rd party
30
Q

what two theories would make the agent (who has no actual authority) liable to the 3rd party

A
  • misrepresentation (did agent advise 3rd party he had authority?)
  • breach of implied warranty of authority (agent impliedly warrant that he has the necessary authority when he enters into the contract with 3rd party)
31
Q

obligations of the principal to the agent

A
  • abide by agreement
  • maintain true account of any money owed to agent
  • reimburse expenses incurred by agent
  • warn agent of dangers
  • indemnification (indemnify agent for any losses or expenses)
32
Q

obligations of agent to principal

A
  • abide by agreement
  • follow lawful and reasonable instructions of principal
  • carry out agency using reasonable care
  • duty to account to principal for any money in agent’s possession that belongs to principal
  • duty to notify principal of any info learned by agent that bears on agency
  • undivided loyalty
  • agent must indemnify the principal for any loss caused by the agent’s breach of duty owed to principal
33
Q

undivided loyalty

A

cannot have any conflicts of interest and cannot be improperly benefitted at the expense of the principal

34
Q

sanctions for violation of duty of loyalty

A

(they’re severe)

  • termination of agent
  • principal can recover compensation paid to agent during the period of time that agent was disloyal
  • principal can recover secret profits made by the agent
35
Q

in the context of employment relationship who is principal/agent?

A
employer = principal
employee = agent
36
Q

tort liability of principal and agent

A

everyone is liable for their own torts

37
Q

examples of liability theories against principal requiring traditional tort/negligence analysis arising as a result of other acts of agents

A
  • the employee is instructed by supervisor to perform a tort
  • negligent supervision of the employee by a supervisor who is acting on behalf of the employer and this wrongful act is imputed to the employer
  • negligent entrustment of a dangerous piece of equipment or other instrumentality to the employee by a supervisor who is acting on behalf of the employer and this wrongful act is imputed to the employer
  • negligent hiring practices by employer which results in unqualified employee being hired
38
Q

vicarious or imputed liability

A
  • must have a master/servant relationship
  • tort must have been committed w/in employee’s scope of employment
  • if outside scope, only employee is liable to 3rd party
  • if w/in scope, employee/employer are jointly and severally liable to 3rd party
39
Q

effect of an employee’s violation of rule of employment

A

principal not protected because there was a rule of employment which prohibited the conduct engaged in by the agent (but strengthens cause of action by employer v. employee for breach of employment agreement)

40
Q

termination by acts of parties or as a result of their agreement

A
  • fulfillment of purpose
  • lapse of time
  • upon the occurrence of a specified event
  • mutual agreement of the parties
  • act of one party alone- power v. right to do so-employer rightfully or wrongfully fires employee, or employee rightfully or wrongfully quits
41
Q

termination by law

A
  • death or incompetency or principal or agent
  • bankruptcy
  • change of law
  • loss or destruction of subject matter of agency
42
Q

effect of termination

A
  • agent’s actual authority terminates
  • but agent may continue to have apparent authority
  • notice required to cut off rights of third parties against principal because of agent’s continuing apparent authority
43
Q

types of notice required to cut off ights of third parties against principal because of agent’s continuing apparent authority

A
  • actual notice to those who have had contact with agency in the past (notice must be received to be effective)
  • constructive notice to the public in general who may have merely know of the existence of agency (notice in trade journal, newspaper, etc).