Chapter 17 Flashcards

1
Q

1- Explain the fair trial principle

A

S35(3)- Accused has the right to a fair trial. This includes the right to a prosecutor that acts and is perceived to act without fear, favor or prejudice. Trial fairness is not confined to the accused but extends to society precisely because society has a interest in the outcome of the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2- Explain the principle of legality

A

Prosecution must prove legal guilt in properly conducted trial in accordance with principles of legality, that is in a trial where common law, statutory law and constitutional rules were followed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3- Explain the principle of judicial impartiality

A

Our adversarial trial system, presiding officer is a passive umpire who should not decent into the arena where the dust of conflict could cloud his judicial vision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the seven fundamental principles that govern a criminal trial

A
1- The fair trial principal 
2- Principle of legality
3- Principle of judicial impartiality
4- Principle of equality of arms
5- Principle of judicial control
6- Principle of orality
7- Principle of finality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4- Explain the principle of equality in arms

A

Accusatorial trial procedure based on the premise that truth finding is enhanced if the prosecution and defence are responsible for presenting their respective cases. This is only valid If the prosecution and defence have equal opportunities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

5- Explain the principle of judicial control

A

Criminal court must without sacrificing its impartiality, control and manage proceedings within the bounds of the law of criminal procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

6- Explain the principle of orality

A

Evidence on disputed question of fact should be given by the witnesses called before a court to give oral testimony of the matters within their knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

7- Explain the principle of finality

A

Neither state nor accused should be permitted to reopen their cases once closed unless such reopening is necessary to introduce rebutting evidence where a party was taken by surprise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the case for the prosecution

A
  • Opening Of the states case
  • Calling of state witnesses and examination in chief by prosecutor
  • Cross examination of state witnesses by the Defence
  • Re-examination of state witnesses by the prosecutor
  • Closing of the states case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the discharge of the accused at the end of the states case

A

S174- If at close of the case of the prosecution. Court is of opinion that no evidence that the accused committed the offence referred to in the charge or any offence which of which he may be convicted on the charge, it may return a finding of not guilty.

Masondo: in re S v Mthembu

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define the test for discharge (schuping test)

A

At close of case when discharge is considered, first question is:
1- Is there enough evidence on which a reasonable man might convict, if not
2- Is there a reasonable possibility that the defence evidence might supplement the state.
If the answer is yes to either question then there is no discharge and accused should be placed on his defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the defence case

A

1- The passive defence right
2- Defence address
3- The active defence right
4- The active defence right and sequence of defence witnesses
5- Evidence in chief of defence witness
6- Cross examination of defence witnesses by the prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Discuss the basic nature and content of cross examination

A

Parties who called a witness have a fundamental right to cross examine the witness. The purpose is to elicit facts which are favorable to the cross examiners case. Leading questions are permitted. Cross examiner has right to cross examine on matters which he disputes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly