Chapter 16 (1) Flashcards
workout
When a financially distressed firm is successful at reorganizing outside of bankruptcy
Prepackaged bankruptcy
A firm will first develop a reorganization plan with the agreement of its main creditors and then file chapter 11 to implement the plan (and pressure any creditors who attempt to hold out for better terms) With a prepack, the firm emerges from bankruptcy quickly and with minimal direct costs
Indirect costs associated with financial distress
Loss of customers
Loss of suppliers
Loss of employees
Loss of receivables (firms in financial distress tend to have difficulty collecting money that is owed to them, especially small amounts)
Fire sales of assets (in an effort to avoid bankruptcy and its associated costs, companies in distress may attempt to sell assets quickly to raise cash. To do so the firm may accept a lower price than would be optimal if it were healthy)
INnefficient liquidation (bankruptcy protection can be used by management to delay the liquidation of a firm that should be shut down, can lose money because management was allowed to continue making negative NPV investments )
Costs to creditors
Debtor in possession financing
New debt issued by a bankrupt firm. Because this kind of debt is senior to alll existing creditors, it allows a firm that has filed for bankruptcy renewed access to financing to keep operating
Overall impact of indirect costs
The indirecct costs of financial distress can be substantial. When estimating them, however, we must remember two important points
- We need to identify losses to total firm value
- WE need to identify the incremental losses that are associated with financial distress, above and beyond any losses that would occur due to the firms economic distress
Trade off theory
The total value of a levered firm equals the value of the firm without leverae plus the present value of the tax savings from debts, less the present valule of financial distress costs
Trade off theory formula
V^L = V^U + PV(interest tax shield) - PV(Financial distress costs)
Three key factors determine the present value of financial distress costs
1) the probability of financial distress
2) The magnitude of the costs if the firm is in distress
3) The appropriate discount rate for the distress costs
The presence of financial distres scosts can explain why
Firms choose dbet leves that are too low to fully exploit the interest tax shield
Differenceis in the magnitude of financial distress costs and the volatility of cash flows can explain the differences in the use of leverage across industries
agency costs
Costs that arise when there are conflicts of interest between stakeholders
asset substitution problem
when a firm faces financial distress, shareholders can gain from decisions that increase the risk of the firm sufficiently, even if they have a negative NPV
Cashing out
when a firm faces financial distress, shareholders have an incentive to withdraw cash from the firm if possible.
As an example, suppose baxter has equipment it can sell for $25,000 at the beginning of the year. It will need this equipment to continue normal operations during the year; without it, Baxter will have to shut down some operations and the firm will be worth only $800,000 at year-end. Although selling the equipment reduces the value of the firm by $100,000, if it is likely that Baxter will default at yearend, this cost would be borne by the debt holders. So, equity holders gain if Baxter sells the equipment and uses the $25,000 to pay an immediate cash dividend. This incentive to liquidate assets at prices below their actual value to the firm is an extreme form of underinvestment resulting from the debt overhang.
Esstimating debt overhang: equity holders will benefit from the new investment only if:
NPV/I > betaDD/betaEE
I = amount invested in a new investment project with similar risk to the rest of the firm
Leverage ratchet effect
Once existing debt is in place
- Shareholders amy have an incentive to increase leverage even if it decreases the value of the firm
- shareholders will not have an incentive to decrease leverrage by buying back debt, even if it will increase the value of the firm
debt covenants
Covenants may limit the firms ability to pay large dividends or restict the types of investments that the firm can make. They also typically limit the amount of new debt the firm can take on. By preventing management from exploiting debt holders, these covenants may help to reduce agency costs.