Chapter 15: Law Reform Flashcards
What is the main aim of laws?
- protect society and individual rights
- provide guidelines of acceptable behaviour
- provide ways to resolve disputes
- ensure social cohesion
What is social cohesion?
Social cohesion is the willingness of members of a society to cooperate with each other in order to survive and prosper. It involves living together in peace and harmony, as well as respecting everybody’s individual rights.
List characteristics of an effective law
RECKS
reflective of society’s changing views and values
enforceable
clear and understood
known by the community
stable
What is law reform?
the process of updating & changing the law so it remains relevant and effective
What are reasons for law reform?
PETA (PROTECTION OF COMMUNITY, TECH ADVANCEMENT, ECO+POLITICAL+SOCIAL CHANGES, ATTITUDES+BELIEFS+VALUES CHANGES)
- changes in beliefs, values and attitudes
- changes in social, economic & political conditions
- advances in tech.
- greater need for protection in community
(Parliament often makes laws in futuro, but it cannot forsee many types of advancements. Therefore, new social/political/legal issues can arise, prompting need for law reform.
Provide examples of reasons for law reform
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15hb6_NcVtzQDvz9FRiaDAdMHND4ztFTxQHT3IQnDDR8/edit?usp=sharing
In what ways can individuals influence law reform?
Petitions
Demonstrations
The use of courts
Social Media
What is a petition?
A formal, written request to the government to implement some law reform. This is directly presented to parliament as it is tabled in a house of parliament.
What are the benefits of petitions as a means for individuals to influence law reform
Relatively simple, easy & inexpensive
Online petitions can increase access for members of the community to advocate reform
Parliament - to be representative - is likely to consider a petition with many signatures, demonstrating strong majority support
Act of gather signatures can rise public awareness about desired law reform
Once given to member of parliament, petition must be presented directly to parliament, gaining the attention of other members and of media = raise more awareness and gain more support
Required format is broad, and parliament provides guidelines to general public on how to create + submit petition, enabling access
What are the disadvantages of petitions as a means for individuals to influence law reform
Some ppl reluctant to place name, address or personal details on petition
Some ppl may sign paper petition more than once, reducing integrity of petition
Influence on parliament may depend on who tables it and their influence within parliament (e.g. independent member may have less pull)
100s of petitions received each year + no guarantee/compulsion that the parliament will implement desired law reform - may be years before action is taken
Many petitions don’t gain public/media attention after being tabled & opposing petitions can lower the impact of petitions
Required format must be adhered to
What is a demonstration?
a rally or protest that is undertaken to bring an issue
to the attention of parliament and influence law reform
What are the strengths of demonstrations as a means of influencing law reform?
High levels of attendance can attract positive media attention = shows strong support within community = parliament more likely to consider law reform
Can gain support of parliamentarians who want to ‘adopt a cause’ to improve their public profile
Raise social awareness, persuading others of the need for law reform = prompt change over time
Accessible for all
What are weaknesses of demonstrations as a means of influencing law reform?
Ineffective + may lower support for cause if they cause public inconvenience, become violent or lead to breaches of law
Negative media attention may reduce credibility of demonstration and likelihood of parliament supporting the proposed reform
Usually single events that may not generate ongoing public support for desired law reform
Difficult + time-consuming to organise and attendance can be affected by factors like weather and location. Without a large number of supporters demonstrations may be ineffective (suggesting that few members of the community want the law to change)
Demonstrations can attract groups from opposing sides which can highlight conflicting opinions; if violence arises this may undermine the demands for law-reform
Explain how individuals can influence law reform via the courts
Taking matter to court = unclear point of law may be clarified or established in the process (setting of precedent) = changing law
Challenging parliament’s legislation if it is believed to be unfair or unclear = statute is interpreted and its meaning is clarified OR it is declared invalid = change in law
note: if high court declares legislation ultra vires in constitutional matters, it’s decision cannot be overruled by parliament
What are strengths of the courts as a way of influencing law reform?
The public nature of the courts and the use of the media + decision and comments made in court may highlight the issue to the relevant minister or parliament which can influence legislative changes e.g. Norrie Case
Existing law can be challenged, allowing judge to clarify its meaning via statutory interpretation = setting precedent or legislation ruled ultra vires and made invalid
Even unsuccessful legal action can generate public interest in the decisions and bring the matter to the attention parliament and they can act to abrogate the common law
Judges are politically independent
What are weaknesses of the courts as a way of influencing law reform?
Limited scope for law reform as courts can only decide on a point of law relevant to issues directly involved in the case before them
Case must be brought before the courts for reform to be possible - $$$, time, uncertainty of favourable outcome, standing - Must wait for party to challenge the authority of legislation before they can determine its validity
Subject to supremacy of parliament (except for High Court in cases involving constitutional matters) who can abrogate common law
Judges are appointed not elected by people = decisions may not reflect views and values of community