Chapter 13: The Parliament Flashcards
What four factors affect the ability of parliament to make law?
roles of house of parliament
representative nature of parliament
political pressures
restrictions on the law-making power of parliament
What are the roles of the HOR?
Provide RAPID Care
Provide responsible government: ministers responsible to parliament + people. Can be challenged by shadow ministers on policy matters to expose flaws in legislation
Rep. the people: representative gov. members elected to rep people and make laws on their behalf. bills should reflect views/values of community
Act as House of Review: when bill initiated and passed by senate, H.O.R can debate + pass bill to gov-gen to receive royal assent
Publicise and scrutinise gov. administration: must publicise gov. policies so they can be debated and matters of public importance can be discussed
Initiate and make laws
Determine the gov.: party/coalition with most seats forms gov.
Control gov. expenditure: Bill must be passed through both houses before gov. can collect taxes or spend money. Money bills can only be initiated by the lower house
What are the roles of the Senate?
PASS
Propose and pass bills: Can initiate bills (but not money bills) and pass those approved by H.O.R without amendment, with amendment (or request amendment for money bills) or reject.
Act as house of review: debate and review bills passed by H.O.R
act as States’ house: has equal representation from all states (regardless of population) so that they retain some power at Commonwealth level. Thus, reps interests of the states in law-making.
Scrutinise bills through committee process: committee members assess bills to determine its social, legal and political effects.
How does a majority government in the HOR influence the effectiveness of parliament as a law-maker?
- party/coalition with majority seats in HOR forms government
- bills initiated by gov. likely to accepted and passed by HOR
= gov. can fulfil election promises and implement law reform (+)
= objective scrutiny not applied, gov bills automatically passed and private member bills easily rejected as reps usually vote along party lines + not adequately debated
Why are private member’s bills usually introduced in the upper house?
- gov. usually does not hold majority of seats in Senate
- ## introducing in senate = bill can be debated/objectively scrutinised and possibly passed - not rejected for political gain.
Private member’s bills often fail, so why do they even bother initiating them?
- raise media publicity
- gain media/public/parliamentarian attention
Define law reform
process of constantly updating and changing the law so it remains relevant and effective
What is a hung parliament?
Situation in which neither major political party wins majority of seats in the lower house after an election
What is a minority government?
gov that does not hold majority of seats in the lower house and relies on support from minor parties and independents (i.e. the crossbench) to form gov.
How does a minority government in the lower house influence the effectiveness of parliament as law-makers?
= Must constantly negotiate with minor parties/independents (i.e. the crossbench) to pass legislative program; may have to dilute o.g. policies - possibly going against community will (-)
= Ensures that gov. bills are objectively scrutinised and rigorously debated in lower house e.g. Gillard Gov 2010-2012 passed 432 bills (+)
How does government majority in the upper house influence the effectiveness of parliament as a law-maker?
= Gov. members tend to vote along party lines and automatically pass gov. bills without applying objective scrutiny. Leads to rubber stamp + Senate cannot truly act as ‘house of review’ e.g. Liberal/National government between 2004-2007 (-)
= Gov. can efficiently pass law reforms/promises made during election campaign = can be representative and reflect views of majority of people who elected it (+)
What is a rubber stamp?
When the government holds the majority in both the upper and lower house, and votes along party lines by automatically passing gov. policy —— (without applying objective scrutiny. Merely confirms decisions made by gov. in lower house)
How does a hostile upper house influence the effectiveness of parliament as a law-maker?
- When the opposition holds the majority of seats in the upper house and refuses to pass legislation or only does so with considerable amendments the house is referred to as ‘hostile’.
- Harder for government to implement legislative policy agenda as opposition and cross-bench can vote together to reject gov. policy or force gov. to make significant amendments = stunt parliament in law-making + delays = less effective (-)
- More scrutiny and debate applied to gov. policy = kept in check (+)
What is a hostile upper house?
When the opposition holds the majority of seats in the upper house and refuses to pass legislation or only does so with considerable amendments.
What is the balance of power?
No single party has majority of seats in one or both houses of parliament