chapter 14 powerpoint Flashcards
Family violence def
Any form of abuse, mistreatment, or neglect that children or adults experience from other members of their family
abuse def
A situation in which a person takes advantage of a less powerful person
Family Violence
Not examined until recently (1960s) due to:
- Abuse within the family was thought to be rare.
- When it did occur it was thought that abuse reflected rare psychopathology of offender or was fault of victim.
Types of Violence/Abuse Within the Family
Child Abuse Intimate Partner Violence Elder Abuse Parent Abuse Sibling Abuse Honour Violence
What is Child Abuse?
- Child abuse includes physical, sexual, emotional abuse
- Also includes neglect and any violence children see or hear in their families
- Abuse may occur in child’s home or in other people’s homes, at schools or community centres
- A betrayal of trust and an abuse of power over the child
Incidence/Prevalence:
Exact rates unknown
Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect (CIS - 1998, 2003, 2008):
In 2008 there were 14.19 substantiated cases of child maltreatment per 1,000 children in Canada. These cases involved:
Physical abuse - 20%
Sexual abuse - 3%
Neglect - 34%
Emotional abuse - 9%
Witnessed Domestic Violence - 34%
Section 43 of Canadian Criminal Code
Correction by Force:
“Every schoolteacher, parent or person standing in the place of a parent is justified in using force by way of correction toward a pupil or child, as the case may be, who is under his care, if the force does not exceed what is reasonable under the circumstances”.
Repeal Based on 3 Primary Areas
- Association between the use of corporal punishment and child abuse:
- 2008 CIS found 69% of substantiated cases of physical abuse
consisted of inappropriate punishment - Human rights issues:
- Criminal Code Protection
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
- Developmental outcomes of corporal punishment.
Developmental Outcomes of Corporal Punishment:
Non-compliance
Decreased internalization of desired norms
Development of aggression and antisocial
behavior
Negative impact on mental health
Negative impact on neurological, cognitive, emotional and social development
Swedish Model
Gradual changes in legislation:
1928 – corporal punishment banned in secondary schools
1957 – defense for corporal punishment removed from Penal Code
1966 – right to use corporal punishment removed from Parenthood and Guardianship Code
1979 - the use of corporal punishment explicitly banned in Parenthood and Guardianship Code
Parent’s Code Reads:
“Children are entitled to care, security and a
good upbringing. Children are to treated with
respect for their person and individuality and
may not be subjected to physical punishment
or other injurious or humiliating treatment.”
Based on education versus criminalization
Parents offered education, support and early intervention
Effects of Changes in Swedish Law
- Change in Attitudes:
- 1965 53% of Swedes supported corporal punishment
- 1994 11% of Swedes supported corporal punishment - Declining Rates of Child Abuse
- Earlier Intervention for Families
- Changes Among Youth
↓ alcohol and drug use
↓ suicide
↓youth crime ( narcotics trafficking, burglaries, auto theft, rape)
IPV/Partner Abuse Defined:
Violence committed by legally married, separated, divorced, or common-law partners, current or previous dating partners, and other intimate partners
Is a pattern of violent and/or coercive behaviour
Intimate Partner Violence Includes
Physical Abuse Sexual Abuse Psychological and Emotional Abuse Neglect Financial Abuse Homicide Often different kinds of abuse occur in combination.
Types of Intimate Partner Violence
Common/Situational Couple Violence
Patriarchal Terrorism/Intimate Terrorism
Resistant/Defensive Violence
Numbers IPV
Statistics vary - 1 in 4 to 1 in 10 women are abused by their partners; Rates higher for Aboriginal women and women with disabilities
Females more frequently victimized than males
More likely to be injured and more severe injuries
More likely to be killed
More likely to be economically dependent
(Gelles, 2010; Ogrodnik, 2009; Strauss, 2009)
Women safer on the street than in their homes