Chapter 14: Deciding Upon the Community's Plan Flashcards
Formal/required steps in community plan:
1) Decide to prepare a plan (or amend it)
2) Solicit concerns and suggestions from community
3) Present a draft plan
4) Decide on plan bylaw
5) Province approves the plan
6) Implement plan using various tools
7) Review the plan
Phases in developing substance of plan (informal):
1) Determine community preferences
2) Articulate goals and objectives
3) Plan writing
4) Implementing the plan
5) Clarifying the plan
2 sides of decision making:
1) Objective: knowing who is involved in the stages of planning
2) Qualitative: how participants react, respond, behave and perform
Formal vs Informal agents:
Formal: have defined functions in planning and have to participate (councillors, officials, PACs)
Informal: act in an individual capacity and choose to participate (planners, the public, developers)
2 roles of public:
Proponents: support process
Challengers: feel that process is manipulative
Visibility in planning:
processes made more visible with public participation programs, focus groups and advisory groups
3 ways land development affects plan-making:
- differences between properties affect the type of development
- developers see potential of land differently
- landowners/public view development differently
Variance:
permission for development that goes against zoning bylaws, usually because of unusual size or topography of the land; needs to be approved by a Zoning Appeal Board
2 types of dispute resolution:
Negotiation: advocates on each side seek mutual solutions
Mediation: neutral third party helps find an agreeable solution
Social cooperation:
for community planning to work, there needs to be sharing of information and the opportunity to refine proposals and bring in new solutions. It should allow for feedback, reexamination and modification.
Corporate planning:
planning with a decision-making process similar to that of private firms, used in the past by commercial groups to keep politics out of planning
New types of budgeting:
1) Performance budgeting: looks at output obtained by expenditures
2) Program budgeting: looks at output of groupings of expenditures
3) Zero-base budgeting: requires all operating units to annually justify expenditures against community goals
Plunkett and Betts’ 4 stage model of corporate planning:
1) Policy planning: define priorities and set objectives
2) Action planning: establish program alternatives and budgets
3) Operations: carry out program activities
4) Feedback and review: assess program impacts
Limitations of Plunkett and Betts’ Model:
time horizon is shorter, assumes top-bottom goals reflect all interests, assumes hierarchy that can’t exist in planning, assumes that participants can act independently
Local political economy:
planning must incorporate the economic marketplace as well as the political arena