Chapter 13: Writing the CBA Report Flashcards
1
Q
Where the CBA fits in the decision-making process
A
- make recommendations, not decisions
- only one input into the decision-making process
- difficult when resources are scarce
- push towards a more efficient resource allocation
- consider not just net efficiency benefits but also distributional effects in referent group analysis
2
Q
Multi-step process
A
- specify the project and its alternatives
- identify referent group stakeholders and point of view
- brief discussion of cba methodology
- conduct base case followed by sensitivity analysis
- make recommendations
3
Q
What is the report’s objective?
A
Provide policy recommendations based on the CBA, focusing mainly on the Referent Group CBA results
4
Q
Who is the audience?
A
Bureaucrats (policy makers) so make the report short and precise
5
Q
Who do decision-makers represent?
A
Assume they represent their people, who are directly and indirectly affected by the projects
6
Q
Criteria for recommendation
A
- overall improvement (at least potential Pareto improvement for aggregate RG)
- distribution effects -> gains/losses for RG stakeholders acceptable? gain or “acceptable” loss for non-RG groups?
7
Q
General elements in a report
A
- description of the project wiht an explanation of its need/importance
- statement of the point of view; methodology; assumptions; scenarios
- description of the analysis (base case)
- description of the sensitivity and threshold analysis
- discussion of net benefits and distributional effects
- justification for the decision criteria used
- significant qualitative/non-monetary impacts identified but not quantified
- the final recommendation in a way that its implications and qualifications are easily understood by decision-makers -> present supporting evidence; justify decision
- biases, limitations and deficiencies of the analysis, including areas for future investigation
8
Q
Discussion of results: Questions to be answered
A
- should the project be accepted?
- if applicable, is the private firm or public entity likely to be interested in the project?
- will the project receive support from referent group stakeholders?
- potential opponents of the project?
- possible to deal with that? (redistribution)