Chapter 13: Writing the CBA Report Flashcards

1
Q

Where the CBA fits in the decision-making process

A
  • make recommendations, not decisions
  • only one input into the decision-making process
  • difficult when resources are scarce
  • push towards a more efficient resource allocation
  • consider not just net efficiency benefits but also distributional effects in referent group analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Multi-step process

A
  • specify the project and its alternatives
  • identify referent group stakeholders and point of view
  • brief discussion of cba methodology
  • conduct base case followed by sensitivity analysis
  • make recommendations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the report’s objective?

A

Provide policy recommendations based on the CBA, focusing mainly on the Referent Group CBA results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who is the audience?

A

Bureaucrats (policy makers) so make the report short and precise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who do decision-makers represent?

A

Assume they represent their people, who are directly and indirectly affected by the projects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criteria for recommendation

A
  • overall improvement (at least potential Pareto improvement for aggregate RG)
  • distribution effects -> gains/losses for RG stakeholders acceptable? gain or “acceptable” loss for non-RG groups?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

General elements in a report

A
  • description of the project wiht an explanation of its need/importance
  • statement of the point of view; methodology; assumptions; scenarios
  • description of the analysis (base case)
  • description of the sensitivity and threshold analysis
  • discussion of net benefits and distributional effects
  • justification for the decision criteria used
  • significant qualitative/non-monetary impacts identified but not quantified
  • the final recommendation in a way that its implications and qualifications are easily understood by decision-makers -> present supporting evidence; justify decision
  • biases, limitations and deficiencies of the analysis, including areas for future investigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Discussion of results: Questions to be answered

A
  • should the project be accepted?
  • if applicable, is the private firm or public entity likely to be interested in the project?
  • will the project receive support from referent group stakeholders?
  • potential opponents of the project?
  • possible to deal with that? (redistribution)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly