Chapter 13: Moral and Prosocial Development Flashcards
How can you contrast what we know about the development of expected fairness/morality with Piaget’s belief of how morality develops?
“…morality, specifically empathy, helping behaviour, categorizing people as helping and hindering, and the expectation of fairness, develop in infancy. These findings contradict Piaget who believed that fairness developed in mid-childhood, and developed as a result of peer interactions.”
What is the naturalistic fallacy, and who is responsible for describing it?
“The error of equating what is good with what is natural, akin to the “is–ought” fallacy.” Described by George Edward Moore in 1903.
When does the Piagetian Transitional Period begin and end, and what are the two main developments in this time?
From eight years to ten years. 1) After spending time in more balanced, peer relationships, children learn that rules are socially negotiable. 2) Learn to consider intention when making moral judgements.
When does the Piagetian Moral of Constraint stage occur in development, and what are two key ideas regarding it?
Before eight years, or before children reach the concrete operational stage. 1) Everything is unalterably absolute: either permanently good or permanently bad. 2) Intention does not matter in determining if something is good or bad, only outcome. Ex. Cup breaking experiment.
What does the Westermarck hypothesis state?
Adults who were raised together will feel disgust at the prospect of sexual involvement with each other.
What were a few of the major criticisms thrown at Kohlberg’s stages of morality?
1) Kohlberg only studied males, which lead to an overestimation of adherence to social principles and ideals. 2) His results could not be generalized cross-culturally.
How is a child likely to explain that a social convention has been violated? Would this differ from the violation of a moral rule?
Convention: The person’s actions were rude or impolite. Moral Rule: The person’s actions were harmful.
How would an evolutionary psychologist best explain morality?
“The evolutionary psychology perspective rejects the idea that the acquisition of morality should be left to general-purpose learning mechanisms. Moral learning is constrained by learning mechanisms designed by natural selection.”
At which age do children start to identify cheaters?
Three years.
In how many other animals do we see a moral psychology?
“…no other animal has a human-like moral psychology. Humans are unique in having any kind of obligatory moral behavior: a psychology that tells us that we (and others) must actively behave in ways that aid other individuals. The emotions that support human morality, including shame, guilt, and empathy, are uniquely part of human psychology.”
Assign a definition to the term ‘Grammar of Morality’.
The rules, heuristics, and intuitions that are a part of our human psychology and allow us to make moral decisions quickly and automatically.
Provide three pieces of evidence for the Westermarck hypothesis.
1) Chinese/Vietnamese minor marriages, where brides are bought at a young age (before 30 months) and raised with the family, tend to result in poorer marriage outcomes. 2) Children raised in Kibbutz, a group home of sorts, will marry each other much less frequently than you would expect by chance. 3) The sexual disgust that a person shows towards the concept of incest is mediated by the amount of time that they co-resided with a sibling.
When does the Piagetian Autonomous Morality stage begin, and what is the central theme here?
Usually at ten years of age. Children develop a concept of fairness across situations. They know that rules should meet the needs of multiple people, that punishment should be socially agreed upon, and that sometimes authority figures pose unjust rulesets.
When do infants, themselves, begin to fairly divide rewards upon completing a task with another person?
Three years.
How would you explain the original philosophical debate surrounding morality? Who were the main proponents of each side?
Nature vs. nurture. John Stuart Mills argued for utilitarianism, a type of nature argument. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke argued for empiricism, a type of nurture argument.