Chapter 13 - Judgement, Decisions and Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

-judgement:

A

about appearance etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

-Decisions:

A

the process of making choices between alternatives, based on judgements that we make

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

-Reasoning:

A

the process of drawing conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Inductive Reasoning

A
  • the process of drawing general conclusions based on specific observations and evidence, the conclusions we reach are probably but not definitely true
  • reasoning that is based on observation
  • reaching conclusions from evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

inductive reasoning

-Observation

A

-all the crows I’ve seen in Pittsburg are black. When I visited my brother in Washington, DC, the crows I saw there were back too

Conclusion

-I think it is a pretty good bet that all crows are black
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strength of Argument

A
  • representativeness of observations – how well do the observations about a particular category represent all the members of that category?
    • number of observations
    • quality of observations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Used to make scientific discoveries

inductive reasoning

A

hypothesis and general conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Used in everyday life

inductive reasoning

A

-make a prediction about what will happen based on observation about what has happened in the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Heuristics

A
  • ”rules of thumb” that are likely to provide the correct answer to a problem, but are not foolproof
  • provide us with shortcuts to help us generalize form specific experiences to broader judgements and conclusions
  • two more commonly used heuristics include the availability heuristic and the representativeness heuristic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

-Availability heuristic:

A

events more easily remembered are judged as being more probable than those less easily remembered (Tversky and Kahneman, 1973)

  • Which is more prevalent, words that begin with letter r, or words in which r is the third letter?
  • Most people stated that there are more words that start with r. Actually, there are three times more words that have r in the third position
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Illusory Correlations:

A

correlation appears to exist, but either does not exist or is much weaker than assumed. Wearing a “lucky shirt” for a certain outcome to occur, no real relationship exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

stereotypes:

A
oversimplified generalizations about a group or class of people that often focuses on the negative
 	-selective attention to the stereotypical behaviours makes these behaviours more available, based on the availability heuristic  (Chapman and Chapman, 1969)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

-Representativeness heuristic:

A

the probability that A is a member of class B can be determined by how well the properties of A resembles properties normally associated with class B

  • based on how much an event resembles other events
  • the probability that A come from B can be determined by how well A resembles properties of B
    • use base rate information if it is all that is available
    • base rate: the relative proportion of different classes in the population
    • use descriptive information if available and disregard base rate information
    • we randomly pick on male from the population of the US. The male, Robert, wears glasses, speaks quietly, and reads a lot. Is it more likely that Robert is a librarian for a farmer?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

-Use base rate information if it all that available

A
  • In a group of 100 people, there are 30 farmers and 1 librarian. We pick one male, Robert. Is it more likely that Robert is a librarian or a farmer?
  • Use descriptive information and disregard base rate information
    • in a group of 100 people, there are 30 farmers and 1 librarian, and we pick Robert
    • The male, Robert, wears glasses, speaks quietly, and reads a lot. Is it more likely that Robert is a librarian for a farmer?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Conjunction rule:

A

probability of two events cannot be higher than the probability of the single constituents

- but 81% of participants picked two  - bank teller, feminist example
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Heuristics cont’d (ignore law of large number)

-law of larger numbers:

A

the larger the number of individuals randomly drawn from a population, the more representative the resulting group will be of the entire population

  • from a group of 10,000 people (5000 males and 5000 females), we choose two groups. First group with 1000 people and the second group with 10 people
  • for which group, the percent of males will be closer to 50% - larger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

confirmation bias:

A

tendency to conform rather than falsify hypothesis, people look for information that confirms their hypothesis and ignore information that refutes it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

-the myside bias:

A

tendency for people to generate and evaluate evidence and test their hypothesis in a way that is based towards their own opinions and attitudes

- Lord and coworkers (1979) had those in favor of capital punishment and those against it read the same article  
	- those in favor found the article convincing  
	- those against found the article unconvincing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

the backfire effect:

A

a person’s viewpoint could actually become stronger when faced with corrective facts opposing their viewpoints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Deductive Reasoning

A

-determining whether a conclusion logically follows from statements (premises)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

syllogism:

A
  • basic from of deductive reasoning
  • two statements called premises
  • third statement called conclusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

-categorical syllogism

A
  • describe relation between two categories, using all, no, or some
    • syllogism is valid if conclusion follows logically from its two premises
    • validity in this context indicates that the conclusion follows logically from its two premises
  • Aristotle’s “perfect” syllogism
    • Premise 1: All A are B
    • Premise 2: All B are C
    • Conclusions: therefore, all A are C
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q
  • If two premises of a valid syllogism are true, the syllogism’s conclusion must be true
    • do not confuse “validity” with “truth”
A
  • Premise 1: all birds are animals
    - premise 2: all animals have 4 legs
    - premise 3: all birds have 4 legs
    • valid but premise 2 and the conclusion are not true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

-invalid syllogism but the premises and conclusions could be true

A
  • premise 1: all of the students are tired
    - premise 2: some tired people are irritable
  • premise 3: some of the students are irritable
25
Q

-so, this syllogism is not valid because both premises are true, but the conclusion is not

A

-premise 1: all of the cats are tired

Premise 2: some tired animals are dogs 

Premise 3: some of the cats are dogs
26
Q

-belief bias:

A

the tendency to think a syllogism is valid if its conclusion is believable

-good reasoning and truth is not the same thing

27
Q

How Well Can People Judge Validity?

-Evaluation:

A

ask people if conclusions follow logically from premises

28
Q

Production:

A

ask people indicated what logically follows from premises

-Many errors in evaluation

29
Q

-Valid but believable

A

Premise 1: All birds are animals

  • Premise 2: All animals have four legs
  • Conclusion: All birds have four legs
30
Q

-Invalid but believable

A
  • Premise 1: All of the students are tired
  • Premise 2: Some tired people are irritable
  • Conclusion: Some of the students are irritable
31
Q

Mental Model Approach

A
  • Mental Model (Johnson-Laird, 1999b): a specific situation represented in a person’s mind that can be used to help determine the validity of syllogism in deductive reasoning
  • create a model of a situation based on the premises
  • generate tentative conclusions about model
  • look for exceptions to falsify model
  • determine validity of syllogism
32
Q

Deductive Reasoning

-Conditional syllogisms

A

the first premise is a “if…then”

- If p, the q. (1sr premise) 
	- p is antecedent, q is consequent 
- for 2nd premise, there are 4 ways  
	- affirming the antecedent (now p) 
	- denying the consequent (now not q) 
	- affirming the consequent (now q) 
	- denying the antecedent (now not p)
33
Q

-Condition syllogisms

A
  • ”If p, then q”
    • is it q. Affirming the consequent (NOT valid)
    • If it’s robin, then it’s a bird
    • it’s a bird (sparrow is a bird)
    • therefore, it’s a robin (sparrow is a robin)
    “If p, then q.”
  • Not P, Denying the antecedent (NOT Valid)
  • If it is a robin, then it’s a bird
  • It’s not a robin (sparrow is not a robin)
  • Therefore, it’s not a bird (sparrow is not a bird)
34
Q

The Wason 4-Card Problem

A
  • effect of using real-world items in a conditional-reasoning problem
    • determine minimum number of cards to turn over to test: if there is a vowel on one side, then there is an even number on the other side
35
Q

Falsification principle:

A

to test a rule, you must look for situations that falsify the rule

- most participants fail to do this  
- when problem is stated in concrete everyday terms, correct responses greatly increase  
- would need to turn over the E and 7 to test the rules
36
Q

-pragmatic reasoning schema:

A

thinking about cause and effect in the world as part of experiencing everyday life

37
Q

permission schema:

A

if A is satisfied, B can be carried out

	- used in concrete versions  
	- people are familiar with rules
38
Q

Evolutionary Perspective on Cognition

A
  • Evolutionary principles of natural selection
  • wason task governed by built-in cognitive program for detecting cheating
    • in contrast to permission schema
39
Q

-Social Exchange Theory

A

-an important aspect of human behaviour is the ability of two people to cooperate in a way that is beneficial to both of them

40
Q

-Cosmides and Tooby (1992)

A
  • created unfamiliar situations where cheating could occur
    • if a man eats cassava root, then he must have a tattoo on his face
    • participants did well
    • evidence against permissions schema
41
Q

Conditional Reasoning

A
  • What is clear so far are
    • context is important
    • familiarity is not always important
42
Q

Decision Making

-Expected utility theory

A
  • people are rational

- if they have all the relevant information, they make a decision that results in maximum expected utility

43
Q

-utility:

A

outcomes are desirable because they are in the person’s best interest

	-maximum monetary payoff
44
Q

-advantages for utility approach

A

-specific procedures to determine the “best choice:

45
Q

-Problems for utility approach

A
  • not necessarily money, people find value in other things

- many decisions do not maximize the probability of the best outcome

46
Q

Emotions effect decisions

-Expected emotions

A
  • emotions that people predict that they will feel concerning an outcome
    • a determinate of risk aversion: the tendency to avoid taking risks
47
Q

-immediate emotions

A
  • experienced at the time a decision is being made

- people inaccurately predict their own emotions

48
Q

-incidental emotions:

A

emotions that are not specifically related to decision-making

- may be related to one’s general disposition or personality, some recent experience, or one’s general environment or surroundings  
- can affect one’s overall decisions making processes
49
Q

-focusing illusion:

A

focus on just one aspect of a situation and ignore other aspects that may be important

  • dating and happiness
    • how happy are you?
    • how many dates did you have last month?
    • correlation higher is ask dating first
50
Q

opt-in procedure

A

-active step to be organ donor

51
Q

out-out procedure

A

-organ donor unless requested not be

52
Q

-status-quo bias

A

-the tendency to do nothing when faced with deciding

53
Q

Risk-Taking Strategies

-Risky decisions

A
  • risk-aversion strategy used when problem is stated in terms of gains
  • risk-taking strategy when problem is stated in terms of losses
54
Q

-framing effect:

A

decisions are influenced by how a decision is stated

- can highlight one aspect of a situation  
- Tversky and Kahnemann (1981) 
	- when situations are framed in terms of gains, people tend toward a risk-aversion strategy  
	- when situations are framed in terms of losses, people tend toward a risk-taking strategy
55
Q

-decision making process includes looking for

A

for justification so a rationale is presented with decision (Tversky and Shafir, 1992)

- you have taken a tough exam. You passed it (failed it or will know the result in two days). You have an opportunity to buy a very attractive 5-day Christmas vacation package.  
- buy, not buy, pr pay $5 to retain the rights to buy the vacation the day after tomorrow  
- ” pass and “fail” are both good reasons for a trip 
- this is why doctors may carry out medical tests that might not lead to different treatments
56
Q

-Neuroeconomics

A

-one finding: decisions are influenced by emotions, and those emotions are associated with activity in specific areas of the brain

57
Q

-Sanfey and coworkers (2003)

A
  • ultimatum game
    • often rejected low offers because they became angry that offers were unfair
    • less angry with an “unfair” computer
    • more activation of right anterior insula (connected with emotional states), participants more likely to reject more offers
    • emotion is important in decisions-making
58
Q

The Dual Systems Approach to Thinking

-Kahnemann (2011)

A
  • two mental systems
    • system 1: fast, automatic, intuitive, unconscious
    • system 2: slower, deliberative, conscious, controlled
      • much of our day-to-day existence is handled by system 1
      • system 2 takes over when we need to be more thoughtful
59
Q

The Dual Systems Approach to Thinking

-Stanovich and West (2000)

A
  • favor terms Type 1 processing and Type 2 processing
    • similar characteristics as Kehneman’s System 1 and system 2 concept
  • favored by many researchers because better reflects the interconnected, distributed processing that occurs in the brain