Chapter 13 - Federal and State Court System Flashcards
What guarantees judgment by one’s peers and provides a check on government power?
Right to a jury trial
What is a set of rules and standards by which society governs itself?
Law
The law has three purposes. Name one.
Resolves conflict between individuals and groups.
The law has three purposes. Name one.
Protects individuals against government power.
The law has three purposes. Name one.
Defines criminal acts and determines punishment for them.
What were the laws collected by Hammurabi, king of Babylonian?
Code of Hammurabi
This code categorized crimes and provided 282 examples and their punishments.
Code of Hammurabi
This was a source of law for the Israelites.
The Ten Commandments
The ____’s emphasis on social justice and individual and communal responsibility have become a model for ethical laws.
The Ten Commandments
Ancient Romans made their laws by writing them down, and the early published version was called ___.
The Twelve Tables
The name of the final Roman legal code.
Justinian Code
This is the single most important basis for the American legal system.
English common law
____is made by judges as they resolve individual cases.
Common law
What areas of law did the Code of Hammurabi codify?
- Criminal Law
- Property Law
- Family Law
What areas of law did the Twelve Tables codify?
1.Family Law
2. Criminal Law
T or F. The judicial branch provides an interpretation of the law.
True
Name two ways to promote police accountability.
- Internal Affairs Units
- Civilian Review Boards
Define. “Something that has separate and distinct existence.”
Entity
Name a central purpose of the courts.
To promote the rule of law.
____ means that no individual, group, organization, or government entity is above the law.
The rule of law.
Name three things that law must be.
- Known to all
Name three things that law must be.
- Clear
Name three things that law must be.
- Equally, fairly, consistently enforced
___ is the power of courts to say that laws and actions of local, state, or national governments are invalid because they conflict with the Constitution.
Judicial review
This means something is non consistent with a nation’s constitution.
Unconstitutional
What happens if a court declares a law unconstitutional?
Then the law cannot be enforced.
T or F. The Judiciary may smite the executive and legislative branches through its ability to declare laws and government actions unconstitutional.
True
T or F. Judicial review also gives courts the power to declare an action of the executive or legislative branch unconstitutional.
True
Name two ways the Executive Branch can check the Judicial Branch.
- The Executive Branch enforces the decisions of the courts.
Name two ways the Executive Branch can check the Judicial Branch.
- The President appoints federal judges with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Name three ways the Legislative Branch can check the Judicial Branch.
- State and Federal legislative branches have the power to:
a. create some courts;
Name three ways the Legislative Branch can check the Judicial Branch.
- State and Federal legislative branches have the power to:
b. set judges’ salaries;
Name three ways the Legislative Branch can check the Judicial Branch.
- State and Federal legislative branches have the power to:
c. and change laws to clarify meanings.
Name three ways the Judiciary is further limited by the rules of our legal system.
- Courts can only decide issues brought before them.
Name three ways the Judiciary is further limited by the rules of our legal system.
- A judge cannot decide that someone has violated the law and sentence them until the individual is arrested and prosecuted first.
Name three ways the Judiciary is further limited by the rules of our legal system.
- Federal courts can not provide “advisory opinions.”
Means “unbiased.”
Impartial
A key element of democracy is that courts must act _____ and make fair decisions without undue influence by outside forces.
Impartially
What is an argument FOR judge’s having life terms?
Some people believe it allows judges to make decisions without being concerned about how it might affect their chances for reelection.
What is an argument AGAINST judge’s having life terms?
Some people believe it ensures accountability to citizens and is appropriate in a democracy.
_______ can hear cases about crimes, like burglary, murder, driving under the influence or drugs.
Criminal trial courts.
_____ can hear cases where one person or group thinks another person or group should pay for causing harm.
Civil trial courts.
_____ is the authority of a trial court to be the first to hear a case.
Original jurisdiction
T or F. A trial court cannot try a case where there is no harm or alleged violation of law.
True
T or F. Betsy can sue Jake for causing a car accident when she was actually harmed in some way by the accident.
False
______ describes a trial system that is a contest between opposing sides.
Adversarial system
T or F. The trial system in the U.S. is an adversarial system.
True
Some countries use the ______, in which the judge plays a more active role in gathering and presenting evidence.
Inquisitorial system
What do proponents of the adversarial system argue?
They claim the judge or jury will be able to determine the truth if opposing parties present their best arguments and show the weaknesses of the other sides’ case.
What do opponents of the adversarial system argue?
It is not the best method for discovering the truth about what happens and who is at fault.
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. A contest between opposing sides with each side trying to present the most persuasive evidence.
Adversarial System
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. The defense and prosecutor and police conduct investigations, argue their case, and present witnesses and the evidence that benefits their argument.
Adversarial System
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. Judges and juries listen but do not question the witness or gather evidence.
Adversarial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. A judge’s role is to be impartial, like a referee, and ensure that due process and other rules and guidelines are observed.
Adversarial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. Any criminal case may go to a jury trial.
Adversarial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. Prejudicial evidence is not presented to juries.
Adversarial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. The accused is not required to answer questions.
Adversarial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. Seeks the truth through examining evidence and investigation.
Inquisitorial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. The judge may supervise investigations and decide whether a case should proceed to trial. Evidence is made available in advance to both prosecution and defense.
Inquisitorial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. A judge questions the witnesses and may gather evidence.
Inquisitorial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. The judge assumes the main role in conducting the trial.
Inquisitorial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. Juries are only used in very serious cases.
Inquisitorial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. More lenient rules on the admissibility of evidence.
Inquisitorial
Adversarial or Inquisitorial. A judge can require the accused to answer questions.
Inquisitorial.
T or F. In a criminal case, the judge or jury must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime occurred and that the accused committed the crime.
True
In a civil trial, the person who brings the suit to court (or the party accusing someone of causing damage) is called the _____
Plaintiff
In a criminal trial, an attorney who represents the government in a criminal case is called the _____
Prosecutor
In both civil and criminal trials, the party responding to the plaintiff (for civil trials) and the prosecutor (for criminal trials) is called the _______
Defendant
A group of citizens who hear evidence during a trial and give a verdict is called the _______
Jury
Which amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the defendant to the right to have “assistance of counsel?”
The Sixth Amendment
Steps in a Trial. The plaintiff’s attorney (in a civil case) explains to the trier of fact (the judge or jury) the evidence to be presented as proof of the allegations in the written papers filed with the court.
Opening statement by Plaintiff or Prosecutor.
Steps in a Trial. The defendant’s attorney explains evidence to be presented to disprove the allegations made by the plaintiff or prosecutor.
Opening statement by Defense.
Steps in a Trial. Each witness for the plaintiff or prosecution is questioned. Other evidence in favor of the plaintiff or prosecution is presented.
Direct examination by Plaintiff or Prosecutor.
Steps in a Trial. The defense has the opportunity to question each witness. Questioning is designed to break down the story or to discredit the witness.
Cross-examination by Defense.