Chapter 12 - Managing new products development teams Flashcards
1
Q
What are some tools tha could keep members focused?
A
- project charter and contract book
- keep members focused on the projects goals
- help them feel a sense of ownership in the project
2
Q
What are virtual teams used for?
A
- whe a project requires the unique skills of individuals who are geographically dispersed and unable to be reassigned
- feasible with information technology
- special attention to issues of participation, cooperation and trust
- losses of communication due to lack of proximity and direct, frequent contact
- members with strong interpersonal skills and work ethic, and can work independently
3
Q
Team size
A
- affects ability to draw upon the efforts and expertise of multiple individuals
- costs associated to coordination
- large teams have more administrative costs and communication problems
- difficult build a shared sense of identity
- potential for social loafing (not contributing their full effort, thinking they will not receive full credit or blame)
4
Q
Team composition
A
- affects knowledge of the team, access to resources and coordination costs
- members from multiple functions -> greater coordination between functions
- cross-functional teams popular
- broader knowledge base
- cross-fertilization of ideas
- wider mix of information sources
- Increases in coordination and communication costs
- difficulty in building a cohesive team (diverse members, homophily) -> long-term contracts
5
Q
Why are brainstorming teams not efficient?
A
- Fear of Judgment
- Production Blocking -> one talks, the other are stopped from thinking
- Feasibility Trumps Originality -> feasible weighted higher
- people should brainstorm and elaborate alone first
6
Q
What are boundary spanning activities?
A
- activities to manage relationships outside the team’s boundaries
- key to a successful innovation team
- most effective in early development process
- three primary types
- ambassador activities, representing the team and protecting from external interference
- task coordination, coordinating and negotiating with other groups
- scouting activities, scanning for ideas and information to expand knowledge base
7
Q
What are the 4 types of team structure?
A
- functional
- temporary, no project manager
- 10% of time
- report to functional manager
- no cross-functional integration
- easy to implement
- lightweight
- temporary, project manager (cross-functional)
- 25% of time
- report to functional manager
- derivative projects
- better team coordination and likelihood of success
- heavyweight
- often temporary, project manager (cross-functional)
- mostly full-time
- members with manager
- platform projects
- impact on careers, creates commitment
- autonomous
- mostly permanent, project manager (cross-functional)
- mostly full-time
- full control on resources
- breakthrough and major platform projects
- potential for conflict grows with autonomy
8
Q
Team leadership
A
- needs vary with the type of team
- autonomous teams having greatest need of strong leadership
- direct relationship, closely related to team success
- main responsibilities are:
- directing team’s activities
- alignment with project goals
- communicating with senior management
9
Q
Team Administration, tools for commitment
A
- ensure that team members have a clear focus and commitment to project
- project charter
- mission statement
- contract book
- project plan
10
Q
Project charter
A
- describes project’s mission and provides measurable goals
- can include
- team composition
- timeline and percentage of time dedicated
- budget
- key success criteria
11
Q
Contract book
A
- basic plan to achieve goals laid out in charter, in detail
- tool for monitoring and evaluating the performance
- it contains:
- resources estimated
- time schedule of developement
- results to achieve
- signed by team members
- helps to establish commitment and sense of ownership
12
Q
What are the 4 types of virtual team?
A
- the more radical the innovation, the greater the need for centralization
- Gassman & von Zedwitz
- decentralized self-coordinating teams
- modular innovation
- lack of a central authority
- communication via telephone, the internet, shared databases and groupware
- system integrator as coordinator
- one individual or office assumes responsibility for coordination
- common understanding
- central focus for project
- core team as system architect
- key decision makers from decentralized R&D
- external customers or consultants, strong project manager
- architectural innovation
- centralized venture teams
- personnel and resources brought to central location, senior project manager
- maximizes integration, coordination and effective resource allocation
- strategic innovations