Chapter 11 - Training Evaluation Flashcards
Training Evaluation Definition
A process to assess the value - the worthiness- of training programs to employees and to organizations.
Why do training evaluation?
- helps to identify useful training programs
- helps to identify who should go to training
- determine the cost benefit of a training program
- determine which training programs are cost effective
- diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of programs
- justify the value of training to executives and organizations
How do most organizations evaluate training?
92% of organizations (according to the Conference Board of Canada) evaluate training through “reactions”. ..soliciting trainees opinion of the training
2 main barriers to training evaluation
- pragmatic
- political
Pragmatic barriers
- gathering feedback from all stakeholders before, during and after training can be disruptive and time-consuming
- training evaluation can be costly (use technology to lower cost, surveys online etc)
Political barriers
- evaluation often only takes place because of pressure from above
- trainers often fear results of evaluation because they feel threatened
2 main types of training evaluation
- formative evaluations
- summative evaluations
formative evaluations
- provides data about various aspects of a training programs (clarity, complexity, relevance)
summative evaluations
- provides data about the worthiness or effectiveness of a training program (cost benefit, payoffs)
2 further distinctions of training evaluations
- descriptive evaluations
- causal evaluations
descriptive evaluations
- provides info that describes the trainee after the training (what did they learn? are they more confident?)
causal evaluations
- provides info as to whether the training caused post-training behavior (performance improvement?)
Kirkpatrick’s Hierarchical Model - 4 Levels of Training Evaluation
- level 1 - reactions (trainees report positive reactions to training)
- level 2 - learning (trainees learn the training material)
- level 3 - behaviours (trainees apply training to the job)
- level 4 - results (training has positive effect on organizational outcomes)
Critique of Kirkpatrick’s Model
- if something goes “wrong” with the training, Kirkpatrick’s Model can’t diagnose the cause
- not well suited to formative evaluation (clarity, complexity, relevance)
- lack of precision in the outcomes
- one model does not fit all types of training
COMA Model
- measurement of:
- cognitive (level of learning that trainee has gained)
- organizational (variables in the work environment…learning culture, opportunity to practice, degree of support)
- motivational (desire to learn and transfer on the job)
- attitudinal variables (trainees feelings and thinking