chapter 11: performance appraisal pt. 1 Flashcards

1
Q

performance appraisal

A
  • Provide critical information for day-to-day decisions about salary, benefits, and recognition programs.
  • Effective performance appraisals helps the organization achieve its business objectives.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

performance metrics

A
  • Is the measure (metric) results-oriented or
    behaviorally oriented?
    * Quantifiable ≠ Objective
  • Does the measure focus on individual employees,
    teams or the whole organization?
  • Most companies use multiple measures of performance linking to pay increases and bonuses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

choice of performance measures

A

Balanced Scorecard Approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

balanced scorecard approach

A

Looks at what contributes value in an organization.
Bottom line success depends on several key aspects:
* Customer
* Internal business processes
* Innovation and learning
* Financial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

customer (BSA)

A

attraction of new customers, improving relations w/ customers, improving company image

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

internal process (BSA)

A

optimizing internal processes and improving performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

financial (BSA)

A

all indicators related to profitability and financial goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

learning and growth (BSA)

A

education of personnel, growth strategies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

performance appraisal methods

A

two major methods: Ranking and Rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

forms of ranking

A
  • straight ranking
  • alternation ranking
  • paired comparison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

straight ranking

A

ranking employees from best to next best, and so on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

alternation ranking

A

ranking employees from best performer to worst performer

i.e.
best performer
next best
next best
etc
next worst
next worst
worst performer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

paired comparison

A

ranking employees based on how they compare to other employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

forced ranking

A

Also called: Forced Distribution, Top Grading, or
Stack Ranking

  • Initiated at GE: Vitality Curve (20-70-10)
  • Employees are ranked in groups
  • Variations: AIG (10-20-50-20) with no dismissal of
    the bottom 20%
  • Other companies using forced distribution: Enron, IBM, Motorola, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Adobe, Ford
  • Highly controversial
  • Worked well for some but not for all
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

rating

A
  • Require raters to evaluate employees on some
    absolute standard rather than relative to other
    employees.
  • Each performance standard is measured on a scale; performance variation is described along a continuum.
  • The types of descriptors used in anchoring this
    continuum that provide the major difference in rating scales.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

two types of rating methods

A
  • standard rating scale
  • behaviorally anchored rating scales
17
Q

standard rating scale

A

when adjectives are used as anchors

example:
1 - well above average
2 - above average
3 - average
4 - below average

18
Q

behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS)

A

when behaviors are used as anchors

example:
- exceeds standards:
* seeks out or is regularly requested for group assignments
* seen as a positive contributor in group assignments
- meets standards:
* positive contributor, works well with most people
* strong contributor when a certain skill is required
* contribution depends on skill / group mission match
- does not meet standards
* seldom chosen for teams, unresponsive to group goals
* has reputation for noncontribution and creating conflicts

19
Q

management by objective (MBO)

A

uses outcomes as the standard performance measure

20
Q

who provides info for evaluation?

A

360 degree performance evaluation based on:
- managers
- customers
- peers
- self
- subordinates

21
Q

supervisors as raters

A
  • Majority (80%) of performance ratings come from supervisors.
  • They understand the job and the dimensions to be rated.
  • They have experience rating employees and know the job requirements.
  • They may not observe employees on daily basis
22
Q

peers as raters

A
  • They work closely with the employee and can provide important performance information, particularly for group work.
  • Can exert pressure on coworkers to perform better.
  • Peers may have little or no experience in conducting performance appraisals (whether the rating is reliable).
  • Peer evaluation may create group tensions or could be lenient.
23
Q

self as rater

A
  • have complete knowledge of own performance
  • BUT self-ratings are generally the most lenient
  • used for development rather than administrative purposes
24
Q

customer as rater

A
  • customer satisfaction is important
  • surverys and mystery shoppers rate performance
25
Q

subordinate as rater

A
  • offers a chance for supervisors to see if they are successful leaders
  • may be difficulty to attain candid reviews
  • should be administered anonymously (grade inflation otherwise)
26
Q

360-degree performance evaluation

A
  • More fair, reliable, and valid than single-source approaches.
  • Promotes equity
  • More appropriate for team-based system
  • Time consuming
  • Create tensions: “Psychological safety”
27
Q

rater errors

A

Recognizing and understanding errors is the first step to communicating and building a more effective appraisal process.

Types of Rater Errors (9)
- Halo error
- Horn error
- First impression error
- Recency error
- Leniency error
- severity error
- central tendency error
- clone error
- spillover error

28
Q

halo error

A

an appraiser giving favorable ratings to all job duties based on impressive performance in just ONE job fn

example:
- a rater who hates tardiness rates a prompt subordinate high across all performance dimensions exclusively b/c of this one characteristic

29
Q

horn error

A

opposite of halo error

DOWNGRADING an employee across all performance dimensions excluseively b/c of poor performance on ONE dimension

30
Q

first impression error

A

developing a - or + opinion of an employee early in the review period and allowing that to NEGATIVELY or POSITIVELY influence all later perceptions of perf

31
Q

performance evaluation process: Key elements in a good appraisal.

A
  • Culture and strategy determine key factors to measure.
  • involve employees in all stages of the process.
  • Raters should be trained and employees understand the system.
  • Raters are motivated to rate accurately.
  • Raters should maintain a diary of employee performance.
  • Feedback must be timely.
32
Q

recency error

A

opposite of first impression error

allowing per, either GOOD or BAD, at the END of review period to play too large a role in determining an employee’s rating for the entier period

33
Q

leniency error

A

consistently rating someone HIGHER than is deserved

34
Q

severity error

A

opposite of leniency error

rating individuals consistently LOWER than is deserved

35
Q

central tendency error

A

avoiding extremes in ratings across employees

36
Q

clone error

A

giving BETTER ratings to individuals who are LIKE the rater in BEHAVIOR and/or PERSONALITY

37
Q

spillover error

A

continuing to DOWNGRADE an employee for perf ERRORS in PRIOR rating periods