Chapter 11: Criminal Capacity and Defences Flashcards

1
Q

What is the criminal age of responsibility?

A

10 years old and over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For a defendant to be fit to plead, what must they be?

A

Of sufficient intellect to comprehend the course of the proceedings in the trial to make a proper defence, to challenge a juror to whom they might wish to object, and to comprehend the details of the evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What will the court do if a defendant is unfit to plead?

A

The court decides whether the defendant committed the actus reus, The court will not look at the mens rea as the defendant has been found not to be legally responsible for their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is involuntary intoxication?

A

Where the defendant becomes intoxicated through no fault of their own and are thus unable to form the mental state required for the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Will it be a defence if a defendant does not know the strength of the alcohol or drug that they are taking?

A

No, the court will not consider this to be involuntary intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If intoxication is voluntary, what two things will the court look at?

A
  1. Whether the drug was dangerous or non dangerous
  2. Whether the offence is one of basic or specific intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If a defendant becomes intoxicated after taking prescription medication, will they be guilty of committing a crime?

A

This will be intoxication by a non dangerous substance and the intoxication will negate the mens rea of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If a person has become voluntarily intoxicated, can they be found guilty of basic intent crimes?

A
  • Yes, a crime of basic intent can be committed intentionally or recklessly
  • A defendant who becomes voluntarily intoxicated and then causes injury to a victim is reckless
  • The mens rea of basic intent crimes will be made out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a person has become voluntarily intoxicated, can they be found guilty of specific intent crimes?

A
  • Specific intent crimes can only be committed intentionally
  • No recklessness
  • A person who is voluntarily intoxicated will not have the required mental state for the desired outcome of the offence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is intoxication a defence to strict liability offences?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is self defence a complete or partial defence?

A

Complete defence and thus, if successfully pleaded, will lead to acquittal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three requirements for the defence of self defence to apply?

A
  1. Defendant was acting to protect themselves, another or property or acting to prevent a crime or effect lawful arrest
  2. Defendant must have had subjective belief force was immediately required
  3. Amount of force used was reasonable based on facts that the defendant believed them to be at the time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can a defendant’s actions be reasonable if they are disproportionate?

A

No, in order for actions to be reasonable, they must be proportionate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the householder exception to self defence?

A

When an intruder enters the defendant’s home, the level of force deemed to be reasonable in self defence is higher than in other circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What level of force can householders use in self defence?

A

Any force that is not grossly disproportionate or not so disproportionate as to be unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In proving self-defence, who has the evidential burden?

A

The evidential burden lies with the defendant

17
Q

In proving self-defence, who does the legal burden lie with?

A

The legal burden lies with the prosecution and the standard of proof is beyond reasonable doubt.

18
Q

What is necessity?

A

Arises when the defendant’s commission of the offence was the lesser of two evils

19
Q

What are the three requirements for the defence of necessity?

A
  1. Act was required to avoid inevitable and irreparable evil.
  2. The defendant only did what was reasonably necessary.
  3. The evil inflicted was not disproportionate to evil inflicted.
20
Q

Is the defence of necessity available to a charge of murder?

A

No

21
Q

Is the defence of duress available for murder or attempted murder?

A

No

22
Q

Is the defence of duress available if the threat is against anyone?

A

No, the threat must be against the defendant, their close relative or friend or someone for whom they feel responsible

23
Q

Can a defendant rely upon the defence of duress if they have voluntarily associated with the maker of the threat?

A

No