chapter 11 Flashcards

1
Q

Organizing

A

arranges people and resources to work together to
accomplish a goal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Organization structure

A

system of tasks, reporting relationships,
and communication linkages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Informal structures

A

set of unofficial relationships among organization
members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social network analysis

A

Identifies informal structures and social
relationships in the organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Potential advantages of informal structures

A
  • Allow people to make contacts with others who can help them get things done
  • Stimulate learning as people work and interact together
  • Sources of emotional support and friendship that satisfy members’ social
    needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Potential disadvantages of informal structures

A
  • Presence of “In and out groups”
  • Susceptibility to rumor
  • May carry inaccurate information
  • May breed resistance to change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Functional Structures

A
  • People with similar skills and performing similar tasks are
    grouped together into formal work units
  • Members work in their functional areas of expertise
  • Work well for small organizations producing few products or
    services
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Functional Structures: Potential advantages

A
  • Economies of scale with efficient use of resources
  • Task assignments consistent with expertise and training
  • High-quality technical problem-solving
  • In-depth training and skill development / Clear career paths within functions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Functional Structures: Potential Disadvantages

A
  • Difficulties in pinpointing responsibilities
  • Sense of cooperation and common purpose break down
  • Narrow view of performance objectives
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Divisional Structures

A
  • Group together people who work on the same product or
    process, serve similar customers, and/or are located in the same
    area or geographical region
  • Common in complex organizations
  • Avoid problems associated with functional structures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Potential advantages of divisional structures

A
  • More flexibility in responding to environmental changes
  • Improved coordination across functional areas
  • Clear points of responsibility
  • Expertise focused on specific customers, products, and regions
  • Greater ease in restructuring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Potential disadvantages of divisional structures

A
  • Duplication of resources and efforts across divisions
  • Competition and poor coordination across divisions
  • Emphasis on divisional goals at expense of organizational goals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Matrix Structure

A
  • Combines functional and divisional structures to gain advantages
    and minimize disadvantages of each
  • Used in: Manufacturing | Service industries | Professional fields |
    Non-profit sector | Multi-national corporations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Potential advantages of matrix structures

A
  • Better cooperation across functions
  • Improved decision-making / Increased flexibility in restructuring
  • Better customer service
  • Better performance accountability
  • Improved strategic management
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Potential disadvantages of matrix structures

A
  • Two-boss system is susceptible to power struggles
  • Two-boss system can create task confusion and conflict in work priorities
  • Team meetings are time consuming
  • Team may develop “groupitis ”
  • Increased costs due to adding team leaders to structure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Team Structures
A
  • Extensively use permanent and temporary teams to solve
    problems, complete special projects, and accomplish day-to-day
    tasks
  • Often use cross-functional teams composed of members from
    different functional departments
  • Project teams are convened for a specific task or project and
    disbanded once completed
17
Q

Potential advantages of team structures

A
  • Breakdown of interpersonal barriers and mobilizing of diverse talents
  • Improved morale
  • Greater sense of task involvement and identification
  • Increased enthusiasm for work
  • Improved quality and speed of decision making
18
Q

Potential disadvantages of team structures:

A

Potential disadvantages of team structures:
* Conflicting loyalties among members
* Excessive time spent in meetings
* Effective use of time depends on quality of interpersonal relations, group
dynamics, and team management

19
Q
  1. Network Structure
A
  • Use information technologies to link with networks of outside
    suppliers and service contractors
  • Own only core components and use strategic
    alliances or outsourcing to provide other components
20
Q

Potential advantages of network structures

A
  • Firms can operate with fewer full-time employees and less complex internal
    systems
  • Reduced overhead costs and increased operating efficiency
  • Permit employment of outsourcing strategies and contracted services
21
Q

Potential disadvantages of network structures

A
  • Control and coordination problems may arise from network complexity
  • Potential loss of control over outsourced activities
  • Potential lack of loyalty among infrequently used contractors
  • Excessively aggressive outsourcing can be dangerous
22
Q
  1. Boundaryless Organizations
A
  • Eliminate many internal boundaries among subsystems and
    external boundaries with the external environment
  • A combination of team and network structures, with the addition
    of “temporariness”
  • Encourage creativity, quality, timeliness, flexibility, and efficiency
  • Knowledge sharing is both a goal and essential component
  • Key requirements:
  • Little hierarchy
  • Empowerment of team members
  • Technology utilization
  • Acceptance of impermanence
  • Virtual organization
  • A special form of boundaryless organization
  • Operates in a shifting network of external alliances that are engaged as
    needed, using IT and the Internet
23
Q

Organizational Designs

A
  • Process of creating structures that accomplish mission and
    objectives
  • An attempt to achieve a good match between structure and
    situational contingencies
  • Alternatives include mechanistic or bureaucratic at one extreme,
    and organic or adaptive at the other
24
Q

Bureaucracy

A
  • A form of organization based on logic, order, and the legitimate
    use of formal authority
  • Bureaucratic designs feature …
  • Clear-cut division of labour
  • Strict hierarchy of authority
  • Formal rules and procedures
  • Promotion based on competency
25
Q

Mechanistic designs

A

work in a stable environment

  • Predictable goals
  • Centralized authority
  • Many rules and procedures
  • Narrow spans of control
  • Specialized tasks
  • Few teams and task forces
  • Formal and impersonal means of coordination
26
Q

Organic designs

A

work in a rapidly changing and uncertain
environment

  • Adaptable goals
  • Decentralized authority
  • Few rules and procedures
  • Wide spans of control
  • Shared tasks
  • Many teams and task forces
  • Informal and personal means of coordination
27
Q

Three Steps in Delegation:

A

Step 1: Assign responsibility – explain task and expectations

Step 2: Grant authority – allow others to make decisions and act

Step 3: Create accountability – require others to report back on results

28
Q

Centralization

A

is the concentration of authority for making most
decisions at the top levels of the organization

29
Q

Decentralization

A

is the dispersion of authority to make decisions
throughout all levels of the organization