CHAPTER 10: HUMAN CHANGE OVER TIME Flashcards
class mammalia
- fur or body hair
- milk-producing mammary glands
- teeth - incisors, canines, premolars
- lower jaw made of one bone
- breathe using lungs
order primate
- flattened face
- opposable thumbs
- forward - facing eyes
- bicuspid teeth
- large brain relative to the body
- long gestational period
- nails instead of claws
- prehensile or grasping hands
- no single characteristic is diagnostic of a primate but taken together the features can help identify one
family hominids/hominidae/hominoids
- large brain (cerebral cortex)
- characteristic skull bones
- absence of tail
- relatively long upper limbs
- wider chest
- shoulder joints that permit the arms to be rotated
genus homo
- homo sapiens are the only existing member of the genus homo
- bipedalism
- large brain
- self-awareness
- use of complex language
- writing and art
- rituals
- use of tools
- culture
how can we tell from fossils that an organism was bipedal
- evidence of erect or bipedal walking can come from
- position of the hole (foramen magnum) in the base of the skull
- arrangement of the femur and tibia (femur is angled)
- shape of the pelvis (bowl shaped)
- shape of the spine (s shape)
- size of the heel bone and subsequent heel arch
effect of bipedalism on hominin behaviour
- freed the hands for tool making
- freed the hands for carrying young
- reaching for higher food
- raising head to scan predatores
- cultural behaviour such as ceremony
- enabled them to walk greater distances and migrate
trends in hominin evolution
- brain size also was increasing (enlarged skull size)
- an increase in the length of feet with more developed arches
- an increase in leg length (a larger leg : arm ratio) - and become stronger than arms
other trends: - a reduction in the size of teeth
- a flattening and shortening of the face, making the face nearly vertical
- a more central foramen magnum
- a smaller zygomatic arch (cheekbone)
- a less prominent brow ridge
- a more parabolic-shaped (or V-shaped) jaw
- the development of a more S-shaped spine.
timeline of hominin species
based on when they first arose
- A. afarensis
- A.africanus
- Homo habilis - first tool makers
- Homo ergaster(sometimes thought to beHomo erectus ergaster) - only found in Africa
- Homo erectus - first emigrants - migrated out of Africa
- Homo heidelbergensis - diverged into homo sapiens and homo neandethalensis (intermediate features between H.erectus and H.sapiens)
- Homo floresiensis - the hobbit - small on stature
- Homo neanderthalensis - all non-african humans have neanderthal DNA
- Homo sapiens
- The denisovans - home sapiens from oceania and mainland asia have denisovan DNA (unknown when they first appeared)
the features of early hominins- the Australopithecines
- were able to walk with a bipedal locomotion
- spine shape was beteen c and s shaped
- a rounded jaw but not parabolic
trend in brain size
- compared to australopithecines, homo sapiens have:
- larger brains relative to their body
- the trend is increasing size with the major exception to this being Homo floresiensis
-
cerebral cortex, cerebellum and areas associated w language expanded at higher rates than other brain regions
- large brains need lots of energy 20% → structural changes
- early homo could not survive on plants - meat → functional changes
- required cooperative hunting - communities → cognitive changes
- use of the brain made only possible because of earlier evolution of opposable thumb and bipedalism → structural changes
- Homo Florensies does not fit the trend (small brain capacity)
trend in leg length
hominin evolution
- longer legs allow more effective bipedal motion
- longer leg to arm ratio
trend in shape of the pelvis
hominin evolution
- compared to chimp
- shorter and broader
- compared to australopithecine
- more bowl-shaped
- allow more surface area for muscle attachment
trend in foot shape
hominin evolution
- enlarged heel
- foot arch
- allow weight to be evenly distributed
- forward facing big toe
- allows us to use big toe for propulsion (to move forward)
trend in leg angle
hominin evolution
- compared to chimps
- more angle
trend in limb structure
hominin evolution
- compared to australopithecines, homo sapiens have
- less angle femur-hip joint
- longer legs
- narrower and bowl-shaped pelvis
what does a bigger brain allow
- Australopithecus
- sexual dimorphism - similar social structures to modern apes
- herbivores
- near forests - grasslands
- simple tool use
- homo habilis
- used tools to prepare food and clothing
- enabled meat in the diet
- homo erectus
- hand axes
- use of fire
- systematic hunting
- travelling
- homo sapiens
- technology
- farming
- caring for aged/ill members of species
relate the changes to leg structure to bipedalism
- angled femur from hip to knee brings knees closer together under the body’s centre of gravity
- central foramen magnum - head balanced directly over spine - better balance + walking upright
- pelvis - helps maintain stability when walking
- s-shaped spine - helps absorb shock and distribute body weight evenly during walking
- foot structure (arch, non-opposable big toe) - balance, shock absorption, and efficient propulsion during walking
how and why the human fossil record has changed over time
- the human fossil record is incomplete
- periods of time in the geological record where very few fossils have been found (2-3mya)
- HUMAN FOSSIL RECORD IS ALWAYS CHANGING
reasons for incompleteness of the human fossil record
- many species of hominins did not live in areas that are conducive to fossilisation
- most hominin species only lived for a very short geologic time
- many hominin species probably practiced burial rituals
- hominin species tend not to leave their dead behind
why scientists can have different interpretations of the human family tree despite using the same evidence
- imprecision of dating methods
- different intepretations
- new evidence is found
- interbreeding between H.sapiens and H.Neanderthalensis
- evidence of putative homo species
how scientists used mtDNA to determine that Neanderthals were a different species to sapiens
- small amounts of mtDNA were extracted from Neanderthal fossils
- challenging bc of the degradation of ancient DNA
- the mtDNA was sequenced
- compared w the sequences of modern humans
- neanderthal mtDNA is distinct from modern humans
Compared the mtDNA sequence of the Neanderthals to the mtDNA of H.Sapiens – they identified similarities and difference
This determined there was genetic divergence and that the two were not closely related.
evidence that Homo sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis and the Denisovans interbred
- modern races of H.sapiens have Denisovan DNA - modern Tibetans have EPAS1 gene - which allows them to breathe easily at high altitudes
- Denisovan DNA accounts for 3-5% of the DNA of Aboriginal Australians
- It accounts for 7-8% of Papuans from Papua New Guinea
- 1-2% of DNA of all people of European and Asian descent is from Homo neanderthalensis
the Denisovans
- bone fragments found in Siberia in 2010
- a finger bone
- more fossils: teeth, fragment of jaw bone, fragment of arm or leg bone and a fragment of skull bone
- found to be a different species
- DNA taken from the genomes of Melanesian Homo Sapiens revealed they share 4-6% DNA with Denisovans but other human populations do not
- most closely related to H.neandertahlensis
- hypothesis:
- An interbreeding event occurred between the Denisovans and ancient Melanesians
- likely occurred between 15000 - 44000 years ago as the ancestors of Melanesians migrated south through Southeast Asia
Homo Naledi
- discovered in 2013 - in a cave in South Africa
- small cranial capacity, but a long survuval
- limb + foot structure → partially arboreal (lived on trees)
- bones exhibited characteristics from both the genus homo and genus Australopithecus
- classified into a new species of the Homo genus, Homo naledi
- hand has a similar shape to modern humans but the curved finger and strong thumb are more primitive