Chapter 10: Business Tendencies Flashcards
1 Introduction to security of tenure
This section is an introduction to security of tenure in the context of business tenancies.
1.1 Limitations of a fixed contractual term
Most commercial leases are for a fixed term, say 10 years. However, the lifetime of most businesses do not fit into a convenient 10 year block. If a tenant’s
business is not doing well, it may be able to get out of the premises early, whether through a break clause or by assigning or subletting the lease. However, what about the end of the lease? What if the tenant wants to stay beyond the 10 year term?
1.1 Limitations of a fixed contractual term
The problem here is that the landlord is in a significantly stronger negotiating position than the
tenant. Why? Because the tenant has settled their business in the premises. For example, a
restaurant business will have fitted out the premises and have goodwill, ie, regular customers who
know where to find them. A landlord might seek to exploit this by charging a higher than market
rent, judging that the tenant will pay it rather than disrupt their business and lose money that way.
1.1 Limitations of a fixed contractual term
This is exactly the kind of thing that was happening in the UK after the Second World War. Bombing raids had contributed to a chronic shortage of commercial premises. Tenants coming to the end of their contractual terms found themselves vulnerable to exploitative landlords who would demand inflated rents.
1.2 The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
The response to this was the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 which was introduced under Winston
Churchill’s government. Amongst other things, the Act provided qualifying business tenants with
security of tenure.
1.2 The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
The tenant in a lease with security of tenure may continue to occupy the premises at the end of
the contractual term. They may request a new tenancy, and the landlord’s ability to recover the
premises from the tenant is limited. Although the 1954 Act has undergone many changes, it is still
an important piece of legislation and the overriding rationale behind it has not changed.
1.2.1 Benefits of security of tenure for the tenant
- The tenant being able to treat the premises as a long term prospect means that the tenant can
invest in fitting out the premises and making them suitable for their purposes. - A retail or restaurant business know that they can reap the benefits of goodwill from their
location. - A tenant does not have to worry about the considerable upheaval that could be caused by
having to move at the end of the contractual term.
1.2.2 Benefits of security of tenure for the landlord
Although the tenant stands to gain more from security of tenure, there are benefits for the
landlord as well in offering security of tenure.
* The premises will be more appealing to prospective tenants
* The tenant may be encouraged to treat the premises as their own, and therefore look after
them. Of course, there will be repairing obligations in the lease anyway, but it is better if the tenant observes them without being coerced into doing so.
1.2.2 Benefits of security of tenure for the landlord
- It may be beneficial to the landlord at rent review, as the market rent may be higher for a lease
enjoying security of tenure. That said, there are disadvantages for the landlord as well. Security of tenure by its nature limits the landlord’s freedom over their own property. Complying with its requirements can also be quite complicated
1.3 Summary
- Before the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, commercial tenants were vulnerable to exploitation
by unscrupulous landlords at the end of their contractual term. - The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 introduced security of tenure provisions for commercial
tenants. - Security of tenure offers advantages for both the tenant and landlord.
2 Application of security of tenure
Section 23(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 sets out when the security of tenure provisions
apply:
…any tenancy where the property comprised in the tenancy is or includes premises which are
occupied by the tenant and are so occupied for the purposes of a business carried on by him
or for those and other purposes…
2.1 ‘any tenancy’ – leases distinguished from other arrangements
Security of tenure provisions only apply to a tenancy. It is therefore useful to distinguish other
similar arrangements. Landlords might use these arrangements to try to avoid security of tenure provisions being implied, but care should be taken as if the substance of a transaction is a tenancy, the
arrangement could still become protected with security of tenure.
2.1.1 Fixed term tenancy
A fixed term tenancy creates exclusive possession and a proprietary interest. It binds successors in title to the landlord. The tenant can use the property as if they were the owner. It can benefit from security of tenure.
2.1.2 Licence to occupy
A licence is a personal permission to be on the land and is not a proprietary interest. It does not bind successors in title to the owner granting the licence.
It cannot benefit from security of tenure.
2.1.3 Periodic tenancy
A periodic tenancy creates exclusive possession and a proprietary interest. It binds successors in title to the landlord. However, it can be brought to an end by notice. It can benefit from security of tenure.
2.1.4 Tenancy at will
A tenancy at will is similar to a licence as it is a personal permission but unlike a licence, the
tenant can have exclusive possession. However, the important feature is that either landlord or tenant can end the tenancy at any time. It cannot benefit from security of tenure.
2.2 ‘occupied by the tenant’
This requirement is reasonably straightforward. If the tenant leaves the premises vacant, then it is
not entitled to claim security of tenure. However, note also that if the tenant underlets the whole or the part of the premises, then it follows that it cannot be in occupation and will lose security of tenure over the whole or part of the premises accordingly
Example
A tenant has an office lease of floors 2 and 3 of a building. It underlets floor 3 for a term ending
one day before its own. At the end of the contractual term, the tenant has security of tenure for floor 2 but not 3.
2.3 ‘for the purposes of a business’
This requirement is widely defined by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 as including any ‘trade,
profession or employment’. Case law has refined this definition further: These have been held to be business purposes:
a charity shop
a tennis club for members only
residential use that furthers the tenant’s business (eg, accommodation for medical school
students or a lease of a shop, part of which could be used for residential purposes)
These have been held not to be business purposes:
Sunday school sessions provided free of charge by an individual
A tenant of a house taking a small number of lodgers without profit
2.4 Excluded tenancies
Section 43 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 specifically excludes some types of tenancies
from security of tenure:
* Agricultural tenancies (as they have their own statutory regime)
* Mining leases
* Service tenancies (a lease granted as part of a tenant’s employment, eg, a security guard’s
flat)
* Fixed term tenancies of six months or less (but can become protected if the tenant has been in
occupation for twelve months or more, whether through successive tenancies or if the tenancy
is renewable beyond six months)
Example
A shopping centre employs a maintenance person and lets to them a room to store tools and materials for as long as they need it for their employment. This tenancy would not have security of tenure.
2.5 Contracted out tenancies
S38A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 allows the parties to agree to exclude a fixed term lease from the security of tenure provisions. This is known as contracting out.
Assessment focus point
Note that only fixed term leases can be contracted out. A periodic tenancy that qualifies for security of tenure cannot be contracted out.
Why/why not contract out?
It might be thought that if a landlord can contract out every tenancy, they would want to. In practice, offering protected tenancies may encourage long term tenants, and not doing so may limit the premises’ appeal.
The following tenancies are commonly contracted out:
* short term leases (5 years or less)
* underleases (usually required by the tenant’s lease)
2.6 Procedure for contracting out 2.6 Procedure for contracting out
The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 used to require a court order be obtained to any contracted
out tenancy. From June 2004, a much simpler two-stage procedure has been in place, not requiring a court order. However, it must be strictly observed.
2.6.1 Stage 1
The landlord must serve a warning notice on the tenant in a prescribed form. This details the
consequences of contracting out the security of tenure provisions. It must be served before the parties complete the lease.
2.6.2 Stage 2
Provide a declaration
The tenant must provide a declaration in prescribed form to the landlord before completing the lease.
2.6.2 Stage 2
Signed declaration
If lease completion is at least 14 days from the date of the warning notice, then this can be a simple signed declaration.
Statutory declaration
If lease completion is less than 14 days away, then the tenant must provide a statutory declaration (declared before an independent solicitor).
Reference to both notice and declaration
The lease must contain reference to both the notice and declaration (or statutory declaration) of
contracting out.
Consequences of not carrying out the proceedure
If the procedure is not correctly carried out, or not correctly referred to in the lease, the likelihood is that the lease will enjoy security of tenure.
Example
A landlord instructs its solicitor on a two year contracted-out tenancy. The solicitor miscalculates
the dates, so that the tenant provides a simple signed declaration only a week before lease completion. The lease is not validly contracted-out, and the tenant will be able to claim the protection of security of tenure. The landlord would likely have just cause for a claim of professional negligence.
2.7 Summary
- To have security of tenure, there must be a tenancy occupied by the tenant for the purposes of
a business - A tenancy includes a fixed term lease or a periodic lease, but does not include a tenancy at will
or a licence to occupy - Certain types of tenancy, such as agricultural and service tenancies, are excluded
2.7 Summary
- The parties can agree to contract out fixed term tenancies, but not periodic tenancies
- The requirements of contracting out are a warning notice, a declaration or statutory declaration (depending on whether 14 days’ notice has been given) and that the procedure is referred to in the lease to be contracted out
3 Implications of security of tenure
3.1 What happens at the end of the contractual term?
For non-protected tenancy
For a non-protected tenancy, the tenant has no right to occupy beyond the contractual term. If the landlord has notified the tenant that it requires possession at the end of the contractual term,
then if the tenant continues to occupy, the landlord may treat them as a trespasser and recover
possession.
For protected tenancy
By contrast, for a protected tenancy, the tenant has the right to stay in occupation. This is known
as holding over. The landlord cannot evict the tenant, and the tenant’s occupation can only be brought to an end by certain methods allowed by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
3.2 Ending a protected tenancy - landlord
The landlord has limited options to bring the tenancy to an end.
The landlord’s options are to:
* forfeit the lease if there has been a breach of the tenant’s covenants and the lease allows this
* serve a section 25 notice, which may indicate an intention to recover the premises or offer a
renewal lease