Chapter 10: Agency and Partnership Flashcards
LO 10.1 Describe the agency relationship
LO 10.1 Describe the agency relationship
Agent
a person authorized to represent or act on behalf of a principal in dealings with third parties
Prinicpal
the person who authorizes an agent to represent him or her
Agency
the service an agent performs on behalf of a principal
This service may be performed as an employee, as an independent agent, or gratuitously
Key element is the granting of authority
LO 10.2 Explain how an agency relationship can be created
LO 10.2 Explain how an agency relationship can be created
The agency relationship can be created by an
- express or implied contract,
- by estoppel,
- by ratification,
- or by necessity,
The key element being the granting of authority , the right or power to act on the principal’s behalf.
Authority
the right or power to act or to make a decision
How is an agency relationship created?
Usually, an agency relationship is created through a contract (an agency
agreement ) between the agent and the principal.
Agency agreement
an agreement creating an agency relationship between principal and agent
an cover such things as the authority of the agent,
the duties to be performed, and the nature of payment to be received
Power of attorney
an agency agreement in writing and under seal
*although the seal is no longer required
in most provincial powers of attorney acts.
Do the elements of a contract need to be present for the agreement to be binding?
All the elements of a contract, such as consensus, consideration, legality, intention to be bound, and capacity on the part of both parties, must be
present for an agency agreement to be binding.
What happens if any of the contract components are missing?
The lack of any one of these elements may void the agency agreement, but that will not affect
the binding nature of any contract the agent enters into on behalf of the principal
An agent who is a minor
An agent who is a minor may not be bound by his agreement with the principal, but any contracts he enters into with authority on the principal’s behalf will still be binding on that principal, unless of course
the agent is so young or insane that he doesn’t understand what he is doing.
However, a contract entered into by an agent for a principal who is a minor will be voidable as if the minor had entered into the contract directly.
Actual authority
authority given to an agent expressly or by implication
May be express (ie. verbal or written in agency agreement)
Express authority
a contract in which the parties have expressly stated their agreement, either verbally or in writing
Implicit authority
when the authority of the agent is implied from surrounding circumstances, such as the position or title given (by the principal) to the agent
Apparent authority
authority as suggested to a third party by the conduct of a principal; may exist even when there is no actual authority
Estoppel
an equitable remedy that stops a party from trying to establish a position or deny something that, if allowed, would create an injustice
Promissory estoppel
the principle that when a gratuitous promise to do something in the future causes a person who relies on that promise to incur an expense, the promisor will not be allowed to enforce other contractual rights that
are inconstant with that promise; the promise can only be used as a defence by the promisee; also known as equitable estoppel
Reasonable person test
in a negligence action, the judicial standard of socially acceptable behaviour; the standard used to determine the existence of apparent authority of an agent
To determine whether a principal is bound in contract with a third party
by the actions of an agent, a person must first ask,
“Was the agent acting
within the actual authority given by the principal?”
If the answer is yes, then there is a contract, provided all the other elements are present.
If the answer is no, then the question to ask is “Did the principal do anything to lead the third party to believe that the agent had the authority to act?”
In other words, was the agent acting with apparent authority? If the answer is yes, and the third party relied on that apparent authority, then there is
a contract between the principal and the third party.
It is only when the answer to both these questions is no that there is no contract and the
third party can only look to the agent for redress.
Ratification definition
when the majority agrees with the terms of a collective bargain; when a
principal confirms a contract entered into by his agent
See slide 24 for the 5 qualifications of ratification
What can you ratify a contract
A principal can ratify a contract even if the agent has acted beyond both actual and apparent authority
In fact, the power of the principal to ratify must meet the following qualifications:
1) The third party has the right to set a reasonable time limit within
which the ratification must take place.
2) The agent can’t make the deal and then search for a principal to ratify it.
3) The principal has to be fully capable of entering into the contract at the time the agent was claiming to act on her behalf
4) The parties must still be able to perform the object of the contract at the time of the ratification
Agency by Necessity definition
consent to act as an agent that is implied when there is an urgent reason
For example, an agent might have to sell deteriorating goods to preserve some value for the principal
Extremely rare today due to easy communication through cellphones
LO 10.3 Review the duties of the parties in an agency
relationship
LO 10.3 Review the duties of the parties in an agency
relationship
What happens if an agent abuses their authority
An agent violating the contract but exercising apparent authority can be
sued for breach and will have to compensate the principal for any losses
suffered.
Does the agent owe a duty of care to the principal?
Oh Yes, absolutely!
An agent owes a duty of care to the principal.
Can an agent go against the instructions provided to them?
However, an agent cannot go against the specific instructions received,
even if it might be in the principal’s best interests to do so.
Delegation
Entrusting someone else to act in one’s place; an agent normally cannot
delegate his responsibilities to someone else
This either needs to be express or implied by the customers and traditions of the industry
When is the work delegated?
The authority of an agent is commonly delegated to subagents when that agent is a corporation or large business
organization, such as a law firm, bank, real estate agency, or trust
company
Fiduciary Duty
a duty to act in the best interests of another; such duty may arise between directors and officers and the corporation they serve, between business
associates including senior employees and their employer, between agents and their principals, and between partners, also called utmost good
faith
Utmost good faith
a duty to act in the best interests of another; such duty may arise between directors and officers and the corporation they serve, between business associates including senior employees and their employer, between agents and their principals, and between partners; also called fiduciary
duty
The relationship between the principal and the agent are often referred to as an ___________________, requiring the
agent to put the interests of the principal ahead of her own
utmost good faith relationship
Full disclosure
the obligation to reveal all relevant details of a transaction
Can you conduct two sided deals? Aka represent both the principal and the third party?
Duel-agency
Double-ending deals
An agent cannot act for both a principal and a third party at the same time
Why? It would be very difficult for an agent to extract the best possible
price from a third party on behalf of a principal when the third party is
also paying the agent.
Can the agents collect any profits or commission without the principal knowing?
Also, the agent must not collect any profits or
commissions that are hidden from the principal, but must pay over all the benefit resulting from the performance of the agency agreement
Other examples of fiduciary duty require an agent to do the following:
-Keep in strict confidence any communications that come through the
agency function and communicate that information to the principal
-Act in the best interests of the principal, even if the agent may lose
some personal benefit
-Not take advantage of any personal opportunity that may come to her
knowledge through the agency relationship
Fiduciary Duty Owed to Indigenous
Peoples
Fiduciary Duty Owed to Indigenous
Peoples
The Royal Proclamation of 1763
recognized Indigenous title to
Indigenous lands but reserved to the Crown the exclusive right to
negotiate the giving up of Indigenous title. This was reflected in the
Constitution Act, 1867, which granted the federal Parliament legislative
authority over “Indians and Lands Reserved for the Indians.”
The Indian Act
requires reserve lands to be surrendered to the federal government
before they can be sold or leased
There have been many cases in which Indigenous peoples have claimed
that they were owed a fiduciary duty.
The Courts have held that:
1) Federal boards and tribunals, even though they are appointed by
and are agents of the Crown, do not have a fiduciary duty to Aboriginal peoples
2) When an Aboriginal group sues the Crown, the Crown does not have a fiduciary duty to act in the Aboriginals’ interest during the
litigation
3) It remains unclear whether the Crown has fiduciary duties to fund social services such as health care and education in Aboriginal
communities because lower courts have made conflicting
decisions.
The Principal’s Duties
The Principal’s Duties
The principal’s primary obligation to the agent is to
honour the terms of the contract by which the agent was hired