chapter 10 Flashcards
Diagnosis of viral infections strategies
- Observation of virus particles by electron microscopy
- Culturing and propagating viruses
- Immunoassays
- Detection of viral nucleic acids
- Diagnostic Electron Microscopy pros
- No prior knowledge of virus necessary
- Identify general virus type
- Identify viruses that are not culturable
- Useful for identification of unknown viral agents in outbreaks
- Has resolution to discriminate between aggregated viral proteins and structured viral particles
- Diagnostic Electron Microscopy cons
- Expensive equipment, skilled scientists
- Need high virus concentrations
- Cannot identify virus specifically
Immunoaggregation
- Used to increase the sensitivity of virus detection when low virus concentrations
- Viruses aggregated by binding to antibodies
- Able to identify viruses specifically and bind them to grids
Immunolocalization
- Virus specific primary Ab and gold-labeled secondary antibody
- Ability to identify specific viruses/viral proteins within cells
- Culturing and Propagating Viruses
Patient sample applied to a cell culture known to support a specific virus replication
If cytopathic effect (CPE) is observed, then the culture is positive.
CPE = observed characteristic changes in cultured cells
Used to be the gold standard of diagnostic virology
Virus propagation can be done in:
Cell cultures
Eg. Insect cells are used to produce flu vaccine for individuals with egg allergies (FluBlok).
Eg. Use of HeLa cell line (first human cell line developed) for Polio vaccines
Embryonated chicken eggs
Eg. Influenza virus
- Culturing and Propagating Viruses pros
Detects multiple viruses (depending on host cell used)
Able to study replication cycle, production quantities, CPE
Able to detect replicating viruses
- Culturing and Propagating Viruses cons
-Can be slow
-Expensive, skilled scientists
Virus needs to be kept infectious during transportation
–Only useful for culturable viruses
-some cultureable viruses require:
—-Specific cell type for infection
—Specific additions to the culture media
Quantifying Virus Titers two methods
Plaque assays and Tissue Culture Infectious Dose 50 (TCID50) assays
Plaque assays
Virus dilutions applied to cells
Can use a semi-thick gel overlay to localize virus infectious foci to restrict virus spread to neighbouring cells
Plaques (cell clearing) are quantified. Each plaque ~ 1 virus.
Can calculate plaque-forming units (PFUs)
- Tissue Culture Infectious Dose 50 (TCID50) assays
Similar serial dilution procedure
But scoring & calculations based on CPE and a math model (vs. counting plaques) Not as accurate as plaque assays, but useful for viruses that don’t form plaques
ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay: common clinical practice
Detects viral antigens in patients or antibodies produced by patients against viral infections
Can be performed in virus infected tissues/cells, fluids, and patient serum
ELISA pros
Quantifiable
Quick
Don’t have to culture virus
Sensitive
ELISA cons
Need a monoclonal antibody against your antigen (for antigen detection protocols)
Need to have available viral antigen (recombinant or extracted from virus infected cells) for antibody detection protocols