Chapter 10 Flashcards
What did Galton find out about mental pictures. Is there a probllem with this research
- some people describe imagining vivid images while other people report little to no visualization at all - are some people visualizers while others are not?
- problem: self -report data may be showing differences in how people talk about mental images rather than the images themselves
What makes certain features prominent in depictions vs. descriptions
depictions: size and position (head of cat)
Description: distinctive and strongly associated with subject (claws and whiskers)
What did Kosslyn’s experiment demonstrate? (cat head vs claws)
group 1 asked to visualize a cat responds faster to head question than claw question
group 2 asked to ‘think’ about a cat and were faster to answer claw question
- this means people cna chose which mode of representation to use which changes the information most readily available
What did the image-scanning test show about mental images
- Subjects memorize a map and the landmarks it posesses
- THey are then told to picture a black dot moving from one landmark to the next
- when the spek reaches the target the clock stops
results: the furthur the distance on the map the longer participants took to move the black speck in their minds eye to the target
What did the ‘zoom in’ experiment entail, and what did it show?
Participants asked to imagine a mouse either next to an elephant or a paperclip.
- then asked if he has whiskers
- slower response time for mouse next to elephant because they have to zoom in to find the answer
- this means that mental images preserve distance relationships and spatial relationships just like actual images
What did the mental rotation task entail and what did it show?
participants had to decide if two pictures were the same but in order to do so the images had to be rotated
- reaction time depended on how far they had to rotate
- in addition regardless of whether pictures had to be spun on a 2D (picture plane) or a vertical axis (depth) they were almost equally as accurate (95%)
- proves that sometimes mental images are less like pictures and more like sculpture
What is another explanation of why it takes longer to scan mental images that are far apart? which is correct?
- perhaps participants are simply trying to do what the experimenter wants
- Perhaps these types of questions do draw on knowledge about how the world works and there isn’t actually any mental travel
- neither is true because the same results are replicated without instruction to visualize
What did Segal and Fusella’s experiment with mind’s ear/eye entail and show?
participants had to detect either the presence of a faint vsual or auditory signal while either forming a visual or auditory image in their mind’s eye/ear.
Results: Participants were worse at detecting visual stim when visualizing and the same for auditory image. There were also more false alarms in both cases
Proves: There is some overlap and competition among resources for visualizing and percieving
what did Farah discover about visualizing and perceiving (H and T)
- participants visualized either H or T then were presented with very low contrast H or T and had to identify it
- visualizing a T made it easier to percieve a T (same results for H)
- proves that visualizing primes perception and they therfore draw on similar mechanisms
What brain areas are involved in both early stages of low-level features perception and visualization of highly detailed images?
Within the occipital cortex, areas V1 and V2
- activation increases when imagining larger objects
Which brain areas activate both when watching movement and imagining movement
Area MT/MST
What evidence from TMS demonstrates the relation between processing and visualizing?
When TMS disrupts area V1 there are problems in both vision and visual imagery
how can brain damage prove relation between perception and visualizing
Patients who lose the ability to see in color can’t imagine things in color either
- same for those who lose fine detail
What evidence comes from neglect syndrome
patient who neglects the left side of his world also neglects it while imagining
- when asked to visualize a familiar street only names the buildings on the right (same effect when perspective changes)
The data shows a functional equivalence between visual imagery and visual perception. what is functional equivalence?
a series of close parallels in how two systems work
How was visual acuity tested in both perception and visualization?
Using “two point acuity”
- in perception the furthur two dots are from the centre of your line of vision the harder it is to tell they are seperate
- When asked to imagine these dots and move their eyes away from them the same pattern of acuity falloff was observed
= qualitatively and quantitatively the data matches
What happens when we preform these same tests on blind individuals?
They are presented with a sculpture to explore and then must imagine scanning it from one point to another
- the results are the same (more distance = longer scanning time)
- However they can’t be using a sense of how things look, therefor they must be thinking in terms of spatial layout/motion imagery
how is spatial imagery distinct from visual imagery? Which do sighted people use?
- represents arrangements of shapes in terms of movements and body feelings
- sighted people can use either
What neurological evidence is there for a distinction between visual and spatial imagery
- fMRI data shows different brain areas activate for visual tasks and spatial tasks
- patients who lose ability to perceive motion also lose ability to imagine it
What are the exceptions in brain damage? (shows perception and visualization might be separate…?_
- patient with bilateral occipital lesions becomes blind but can still perform visual imagery tasks
- some visual agnosia patients also do well on visual imagery tasks
- patients with neglect syndrome in vision but not in imagery
How can we explain these exceptions?
- people with damage to visual areas can still use spatial imagery to perform imagery tasks because this skill relies on different brain areas
- damage to motion brain areas also won’t affect vision
How does patient L.H demonstrate the importance of distinguishing b/w visual and spatial imagery?
Despite being unable to perform task requiring judgements on visual appearance (ie. color) he still performs well in imagery tasks with image scanning or mental rotation
Therefor what are the two types of imagery?
visual - visualize, and spatial - spatialize. Most people have the capacity for both
How do people decide what type of imagery to use?
- depending on the task (color task = visual, speck task - could be either watching it move or feeling your fingers move it)
- depending on ability levels (some people are better visualizers, others are better spatializers)
10% of pop. says they can’t visualize. How was this claim tested?
- no difference found in tasks where spatial imagery was an option
- However in tasks where visual imagery is required (two-point acuity) only vivid imagers reproduced the perception data while on imagers did not
= a genuine difference in quality of imagery experience