Chapter 1 - What are Attitudes Flashcards
Attitude
evaluation of object based on cognitive, affective, behavioural info
2 ways attitudes differ
- valence (direction of evaluation)
2. strength
Attitude Object
Anything evaluation on dimension of favourability
Cognitive Dissonance
Inconsistent attitudes produce -ve feelings we want to reduce so change one of them
Object Appraisal Function of attitudes
save energy and making DMing easier
Strong attitudes differ from weak attitudes (4)
- persistent over time
- resistant to change
- influence info processing
- predict behaviour
Explicit Measurement
requires conscious attention to attitude object (usually self-report)
Equal Appearing Intervals Method (Thurstone)
EXPLICIT: belief statements constructed that are relevant to attitude and Ps indicate whether they agree w/ items (unidimensional) (score is median of item scores)
Likert Scale
EXPLICIT: Rate extent to which agree/disagree w/ statements, involves neutral point
Cannot compare attitudes toward diff objects using this
Semantic Differential Approach
EXPLICIT: Ps given and rate set of bipolar adjective scales (ex. favourable/unfavourable, good/bad)
Importance of context (ex. cold/warm Canada vs. Best friend)
Issues of explicit measures (4)
- Awareness of attitude
- Effects of item order
- Finer distinctions in +ve than -ve direction
- Impression Management (social desirability)
Implicit Measurement
Assesses attitudes w/o requiring individual’s awareness of their attitude or how it is measured
Evaluative Priming
IMPLICIT: Measures extent to which presence of attitude object primes +ve/-ve evaluations (RT should be faster at classification after seeing stimulu prime we like, ex. Clinton (prime) -> Adj (horrible, wonderful) -> RT
Implicit Association Test
IMPLICIT: Based on assumption that attitude objects can be spontaneously activated evaluations influencing future RT (5 blocks w/ 2 blocks of pairing ‘or’)
Affect Misattribution Paradigm
IMPLICIT: complements EP, show pics of attitude object over trials then briefly shown ambiguous stimulus and asked to rate pleasantness of ambiguous stimulus