Chapter 1: Studies and Design Flashcards
what is epidemiology
study of the occurrence and spread of disease
what are the three elements in a confounding variables
- a causal factor for the outcome, eg.age is a causal factor for death
- associated to or related to the exposure eg. age is higher in Australia
- not caused by the exposure eg. the is not caused by living in Australia
what is the extreme case of confounding
where all individuals with attribute A also have attribute B
how can one stratify
- chop up the population into strata where all individuals have the same level of confound
- this however requires us to know what the confound is
how can one undertake randomisation
- using a systematic method of allocating exposures can fail
- use a computer
what must be bewared when calculating the risk percentage
it is the infection over the n, not the no infections
why do we have a control group
- comparison allows us to identify the effects of the response variable
- by forming a baseline for comparison, to detect the effect of any other treatments
what is the effect of randomisation
to use randomness to even out the effect of uncontrolled or unknown confounds
what is the effect of blocking
- ensures known factors of confounder evened out by blocking instead of trusting randomisation
- uses the randomisation of individuals separately within each block to reduce the natural variation by making comparison of similar units
- removes source of confound for validity and also achieves high precision
what is the effect of replication
- have enough individuals in each treatment group so that chase variation can be measured and systematic effect can be seen
- increase replications, increase precision
what is the effect of blinding
- for validity
- avoid conscious or unconscious bias from the experimenter or participant
- this would invalidate results
what is the effect of balance
- for precision
- simplifies the analysis and gives the most precise comparison
- sometimes defeated by nature eg. dropouts
why can causality not be suggested in an observational study
- exposure not assigned
2. no randomisation
what is the point of a cohort study
to compare disease rates in the exposed and unexposed cohort
compare cohort studies and case control studies
- whilst CS uses complete subpopulation, CCS uses sampling from subpopulation
- whilst CS is usually very expensive, CCS is usually less expensive
- whilst CS is convenient for studying many diseases, CCS is convenient for studying many exposures
- whilst CS is usually prospective, CCS is usually retrospective
what is a case control study
where the cases and controls are sampled separately, whereas cohort studies obtain information on exposure and other variables from large populations to measure the risk of a disease; in many studies, only a tiny minority who are at risk actually develop the disease
in case control studies, why are we matching cases and controls?
clever sampling is used to reduce cost and increase efficiency
the number of controls do not have to be the same as the number of cases. the more controls, the more information we have about the controls
thus, it indicates an association between the response variable
what is a cross sectional study
an observational study in which exposure and disease are determined at the same point in time
these are usually cheaper, but cannot determine temporal relationships
they are good for estimating the prevalence of disease
what is the hierarchy of evidence
- clinical trials
- community trials
- cohort studies and natural experiments
- ccs
cross sect
anecdotal evidence
what are the two types of association
- a positive relationship between A and B means that if you have A, you are more likely to have B. vice versa
+ sign - a negative relationship means between A and C means that if you have A then you are less likely to have C vice verse
- sign
this is only an association and not a causation
what can we tell about an association between A and B
a cause b b causes a another factor C cases both a and b a and b reinforce each other a and b just happen to be associated
what is Bradford hill’s criteria for causation
- strength: size of association. smoking means a large increase in the chance of cancer
- consistency: repeat study and get same results. many studies indicate smoking and cancer are related
- specificity: are there any other causes
- temporality: exposure precedes outcome. smoking precedes cnacer
- biological gradient: more causal factor, more outcome. greater smoking level means greater chance ofcancer
- plausibility: makes sense scientifically. smoking affects lungs
- coherence: fit with other scientific facts.
- experiment: can we show it in experiments
- analogy: similar causal associations?
how can confounding be shown in a relationship diagram
in both diagrams, there is a positive relationship between the confound and the outcome variable
whilst there is a positive relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable in a non confounding diagram, in a confounding diagram there is a negative relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable
whilst there is no association or causation between the explanatory variable and the confound in a non confounding relationship, there is a negative relationship between the explanatory variable and the confound in a confounding diagram