Chapter 1: Studies and Design Flashcards

1
Q

what is epidemiology

A

study of the occurrence and spread of disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the three elements in a confounding variables

A
  1. a causal factor for the outcome, eg.age is a causal factor for death
  2. associated to or related to the exposure eg. age is higher in Australia
  3. not caused by the exposure eg. the is not caused by living in Australia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the extreme case of confounding

A

where all individuals with attribute A also have attribute B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how can one stratify

A
  • chop up the population into strata where all individuals have the same level of confound
  • this however requires us to know what the confound is
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how can one undertake randomisation

A
  1. using a systematic method of allocating exposures can fail
  2. use a computer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what must be bewared when calculating the risk percentage

A

it is the infection over the n, not the no infections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why do we have a control group

A
  • comparison allows us to identify the effects of the response variable
  • by forming a baseline for comparison, to detect the effect of any other treatments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the effect of randomisation

A

to use randomness to even out the effect of uncontrolled or unknown confounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the effect of blocking

A
  1. ensures known factors of confounder evened out by blocking instead of trusting randomisation
  2. uses the randomisation of individuals separately within each block to reduce the natural variation by making comparison of similar units
  3. removes source of confound for validity and also achieves high precision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the effect of replication

A
  • have enough individuals in each treatment group so that chase variation can be measured and systematic effect can be seen
  • increase replications, increase precision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the effect of blinding

A
  • for validity
  • avoid conscious or unconscious bias from the experimenter or participant
  • this would invalidate results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the effect of balance

A
  • for precision
  • simplifies the analysis and gives the most precise comparison
  • sometimes defeated by nature eg. dropouts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why can causality not be suggested in an observational study

A
  1. exposure not assigned

2. no randomisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the point of a cohort study

A

to compare disease rates in the exposed and unexposed cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

compare cohort studies and case control studies

A
  1. whilst CS uses complete subpopulation, CCS uses sampling from subpopulation
  2. whilst CS is usually very expensive, CCS is usually less expensive
  3. whilst CS is convenient for studying many diseases, CCS is convenient for studying many exposures
  4. whilst CS is usually prospective, CCS is usually retrospective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is a case control study

A

where the cases and controls are sampled separately, whereas cohort studies obtain information on exposure and other variables from large populations to measure the risk of a disease; in many studies, only a tiny minority who are at risk actually develop the disease

17
Q

in case control studies, why are we matching cases and controls?

A

clever sampling is used to reduce cost and increase efficiency

the number of controls do not have to be the same as the number of cases. the more controls, the more information we have about the controls

thus, it indicates an association between the response variable

18
Q

what is a cross sectional study

A

an observational study in which exposure and disease are determined at the same point in time

these are usually cheaper, but cannot determine temporal relationships

they are good for estimating the prevalence of disease

19
Q

what is the hierarchy of evidence

A
  1. clinical trials
  2. community trials
  3. cohort studies and natural experiments
  4. ccs
    cross sect
    anecdotal evidence
20
Q

what are the two types of association

A
  1. a positive relationship between A and B means that if you have A, you are more likely to have B. vice versa
    + sign
  2. a negative relationship means between A and C means that if you have A then you are less likely to have C vice verse
    - sign

this is only an association and not a causation

21
Q

what can we tell about an association between A and B

A
a cause b
b causes a
another factor C cases both a and b
a and b reinforce each other
a and b just happen to be associated
22
Q

what is Bradford hill’s criteria for causation

A
  1. strength: size of association. smoking means a large increase in the chance of cancer
  2. consistency: repeat study and get same results. many studies indicate smoking and cancer are related
  3. specificity: are there any other causes
  4. temporality: exposure precedes outcome. smoking precedes cnacer
  5. biological gradient: more causal factor, more outcome. greater smoking level means greater chance ofcancer
  6. plausibility: makes sense scientifically. smoking affects lungs
  7. coherence: fit with other scientific facts.
  8. experiment: can we show it in experiments
  9. analogy: similar causal associations?
23
Q

how can confounding be shown in a relationship diagram

A

in both diagrams, there is a positive relationship between the confound and the outcome variable

whilst there is a positive relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable in a non confounding diagram, in a confounding diagram there is a negative relationship between the explanatory variable and the response variable

whilst there is no association or causation between the explanatory variable and the confound in a non confounding relationship, there is a negative relationship between the explanatory variable and the confound in a confounding diagram