Chapter 1: Regulatory and Legal Environment Flashcards
Regulatory Environment - Introduction
This element explores the meaning of ‘professional’ and introduces the concept that as lawyers our conduct is regulated and that we have obligations to our clients and the public.
‘Professionals are governed by codes of ethics and profess commitment to competence, integrity and morality, altruism and the promotion of the public good within their expert domain. Professionals are accountable to those served and to society’
Cruess, Sylvia R., Sharon Johnston and Richard L Cruess, ‘Professional’: a working definition of medical educators
As legal professionals, we are accountable to our clients and to the public.
As lawyers we are legal professionals. What does ‘profession’ mean?
- ‘Any type of work that needs special training or a particular skill, often one that is respected because it involves a high level of education’, Cambridge English Dictionary
- ‘An indicator of trust and expertise’, Professional Standards Council, Australia
- ‘Professionalism comprises the personally held beliefs about one’s own conduct as a professional. It is often linked to the upholding of the principles, laws, ethics and conventions of a profession as a way of practice’, Professional Standards Council, Australia
What does ‘ethics’ mean?
‘Moral principles that govern a person’s behaviour or the conducting of an activity’, Oxford English Dictionary
Key aspects of being a legal professional:
- Professionalism requires knowledge, skill, expertise and a high level of education and training
- but also trust, ethics, morality and integrity.
- Trust and morality are important because legal professionals owe a duty to promote the public good, not just the interests of their clients.
- These principles apply to you as lawyers, in your personal life as well as your professional life.
As a lawyer you will need to comply with:
- Legal
- Regulatory and
- Ethical requirements.
Summary
ü Professionalism requires knowledge and expertise but also trust and morality.
ü Legal professionals owe a duty to the public as well as to their clients.
ü Lawyers need to comply with legal, regulatory and ethical requirements in their personal as well as their professional lives.
Regulators
There are a number of bodies that regulate the legal profession
Legal Services Board regulates all lawyers in England and Wales.
Solicitors Regulation Authority (‘SRA’) regulates solicitors, law firms and individuals who work for businesses authorised by the SRA.
Bar Standards Board regulates barristers.
Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (‘CILEx’) regulates legal executives.
Council for Licensed Conveyancers regulates licensed conveyancers.
Costs Lawyers Standards Board regulates costs lawyers
To whom can a client complain?
- Law Firm
- Legal Ombudsman
- SRA
- Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
Law Firm
The SRA requires that every law firm has a complaints procedure. If a client is unhappy with the service, the client’s first step is to follow the law firm’s complaints procedure
Legal Ombudsman
If the firm’s internal complaints procedure is exhausted, individuals, small businesses, charities, clubs and trusts can refer complaints about poor service and fees/bills from solicitors to the LO.
The LO can require the solicitor to:
- apologise;
- pay compensation;
- correct or put right an error or omission;
- take specific action in the interests of the complainant;
- pay for the costs of the complaint;
- limit the firm’s fees.
Crucially the LO has no powers to discipline or fine a lawyer; the LO’s primary function is to resolve complaints
SRA
The SRA sets the principles and code of conduct that solicitors and lawyers regulated by the SRA must comply with.
If the client has a complaint that is concerning misconduct, dishonesty or breaches of the SRA’s rules, they can complain to the SRA. The SRA has the power to:
- issue a warning to the firm;
- impose a disciplinary sanction, eg a fine;
- reprimand the solicitor for professional misconduct;
- order the solicitor to repay or refund the whole or part of the costs to the client;
- impose restrictions on a lawyer’s ability to practise;
- institute disciplinary proceedings before the Solicitor’s Disciplinary Tribunal;
- revoke recognition of a firm; and
- close down a firm.
Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
The SDT is an independent statutory body. It deals with serious breaches of the SRA’s rules and disciplines solicitors. Its powers include power to:
- strike a solicitor off the roll;
- suspend a solicitor from practice for a fixed or indefinite period;
- reprimand a solicitor;
- impose a fine;
- award costs against a party to proceedings; and
- make a restriction order, imposing a restriction on the area in which a solicitor can practice.
The SDT does not have power to award compensation.
Ultimately the only option left if the client is not happy would be court action.
Law Society
- Represents solicitors in England and Wales to the public.
- Supports solicitors in their careers and practice.
- Is there to fight your corner.
Summary
· A number of bodies regulate the conduct of the legal profession in England and Wales.
· The SRA regulates law firms and individual lawyers who work in businesses authorised by the SRA.
· Clients who are unhappy with the service they receive should complain to the firm, the Legal Ombudsman and may also have the right to complain to the SRA.
· The SRA has power to refer a complaint about a solicitor to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (‘SDT’).
· The SDT has power to strike a solicitor off the roll of solicitors.
SRA Standards and Regulations 2019
The SRA sets out the ethical and professional standards it expects from solicitors, law firms, people that work in those law firms and other legal businesses in the SRA Standards and Regulations 2019 (‘SRA Standards and Regulations’). The SRA Standards and Regulations comprise a number of documents. Key documents include:
SRA Principles (‘Principles’)
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, Registered European Lawyers and Registered Foreign Lawyers (‘CCS’)
Code of Conduct for Firms (‘CCF’)
SRA Accounts Rules
The SRA Accounts Rules regulate how law firms hold and manage clients’ money
References in the SRA Principles and the Codes
We refer to individual Principles as Principle 1, Principle 2 etc.
We use the term ‘Codes’ to refer to CCS and CCF.
We refer to paragraphs of the Codes in the following shorthand format:
‘CCS 2.1’ refers to paragraph 2.1 of CCS, and
‘CCF 3.1’ refers to paragraph 3.1 of CCF.
Principles
The Principles are the key points of ethical behaviour that the SRA expect all people they regulate to uphold.
They apply to all individuals who are authorised to provide services by the SRA, authorised firms, businesses, their managers and employees.
There are seven Principles.
The Seven Principles
The Principles require individuals and firms to act:
in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law and the proper administration of justice
in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons
with independence
with honesty
with integrity
in a way that encourages equality, diversity and inclusion
in the best interests of each client
The Principles
The Principles relate to a lawyer’s relationship with their client and also the court, other professionals and the public.
Should the Principles come into conflict, the principles which safeguard the wider public interest (for example the rule of law) take priority over the interest of an individual client.
The Principles apply to legal professionals in their personal as well as their professional lives.
Code of Conduct for Solicitors, Registered European Lawyers and Registered Foreign Lawyers (‘CCS’)
CCS sets out the standards that the SRA and the public expect from individuals authorised by the SRA to provide legal services, including solicitors, paralegals and apprentices.
CCS is a brief document, approximately eight pages long. It sets out a framework.
You as a legal professional must exercise your judgment in applying the standards to your situation and deciding on a course of action.
You are personally responsible for compliance with CCS.
CCS 7.3 requires you to cooperate with the SRA and other regulators when they investigate concerns relating to legal services.
Code of Conduct for Firms
CCF sets out the standards and business controls the SRA expects of firms.
CCF contains all the standards set out in CCS plus additional standards about the way firms run their businesses, including rules relating to:
- the systems and controls firms must have in place to comply with the SRA’s rules
- the responsibilities of managers of a firm
- the requirement to have a Compliance Office for Legal Practice (‘COLP’) and a Compliance Officer for Finance and Administration (‘COFA’).
Summary
- The SRA Standards and Regulations 2019 sets out the standards the SRA expects from individuals and businesses it regulates. The Standards and Regulations comprise a number of documents.
- The Principles: there are 7 Principles which are the key behaviours the SRA expect from individuals.
- CCS: is a framework document setting out the standards the SRA expects from individuals.
- CCF sets out the standards the SRA expects from firms and managers of firms.
- The SRA Accounts Rules set out rules on how law firms hold and manage clients’ money.
Maintaining trust and acting fairly
In this element we will consider how:
- many of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (‘SRA’) Principles (each a ‘Principle’) require legal professionals to maintain trust and act fairly
- maintaining trust and acting fairly can conflict with the Principle to act in the best interests of each client
- acting with integrity differs from acting with honesty; and
- Code of Conduct for Solicitors, Registered European Lawyers and Registered Foreign Lawyers (‘CCS’) 1 requires individuals to maintain trust and act fairly, including:
- CCS 1.1: you do not unfairly discriminate
- CCS 1.2: you do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others
- CCS 1.4: you do not mislead your clients, the courts or others.
Maintaining Trust and Acting Fairly
Many of the Principles require legal professionals to maintain trust and act fairly:
Principle 1: acting in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law, and the proper administration of justice.
Principle 2: acting in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons
Principle 3: acting with independence
Principle 4: acting with honesty
Principle 5: acting with integrity
Principle 7: acting in the best interests of each client
Although you must act in the best interests of each client, you must also act with independence, honesty and integrity. If the client wants to do something dishonest or illegal, you cannot help them do it.
For example, if your client wants you to lie to a court or other person or body, you must refuse to do so.
What’s the difference between acting with honesty and acting with integrity?
Integrity is broader than honesty. For example, if you mislead a client or the court, you have not breached Principle 4 (honesty), but you have breached Principle 5 (integrity).
What’s the difference between acting with honesty and acting with integrity?
Integrity is about being scrupulous, careful and accurate.
The SRA might take action against an individual for lack of integrity where they have:
Taken unfair advantage of a client or a member of the public
Allowed another person to take unfair advantage of someone else
Misled another person or stood by and allowed another person to be misled
CCS: maintaining trust and acting fairly
The first section of CCS relates to maintaining trust and acting fairly. It is about upholding the trust that the public needs to have in the legal profession. The following paragraphs of CCS are relevant:
CCS 1.1 ‘You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.’
CCS 1.2 ‘You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.’
CCS 1.4 ‘You do not mislead or attempt to mislead your clients, the court or others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client).’
CCS 1.1
‘You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.’ To comply with this standard you must ensure that your personal views do not affect the way you provide legal services. For example, a solicitor with strong religious or political views should not allow those views to stop them from complying with Principle 7, acting in the best interests of their client.
CCS 1.2
‘You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.’
For example, you could be instructed on a matter and find yourself opposite a party with no legal representation. You should not take advantage of the other party’s lack of legal knowledge.
Dealing with an unrepresented client can be challenging.
If the unrepresented party produces a badly drafted document, you should suggest they find a lawyer. If they do not, you need to maintain a balance between acting in your client’s best interest and not taking advantage of the opponent’s lack of legal knowledge and drafting skills.
CCS 1.4
‘You do not mislead or attempt to mislead your clients, the court or others, either by your own acts or omissions or allowing or being complicit in the acts or omissions of others (including your client).’
Misleading a client:
- Telling a prospective client they have a strong case in order to get the work, when they don’t.
- Telling them the case is going well when it is going badly.
Misleading the court:
- Not disclosing a case or statutory provision to the court which goes against the argument you are presenting for your client.
Misleading others:
Making false representations on behalf of a client to a third party. For example, telling prospective purchasers of your client’s company that it is a good or bad deal. You should not give your personal opinion on the value of a deal to anyone involved.
Misleading the court:
ü Principles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 are connected to the requirement to maintain trust and act fairly.
ü Although you must act in the best interests of each client, you must also act with independence, honesty and integrity. If the client wants to do something dishonest or illegal, you cannot help them do it.
ü Acting with integrity is broader than acting honestly.
ü Integrity is about being scrupulous, careful and accurate.
ü CCS 1 requires individuals to maintain trust and act fairly, for example:
ü CCS 1.1: you do not unfairly discriminate
ü CCS 1.2: you do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others
ü CCS 1.4: you do not mislead your clients, the court or others.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
This element explores the concepts of equality, diversity and inclusion.
‘Whether you are a manager or an employee, you have a role to play in implementing EDI policies… You must act with integrity and honesty and in a way which is fair, inclusive and transparent.’
**SRA, Guidance on the SRA’s approach to equality, **
diversity and inclusion, 23 July 2019.
Equality, diversity and inclusion (‘EDI’) applies to everyone
Meaning of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
In this element we will explore:
- what equality, diversity and inclusion mean
- why EDI is important
- the protection required under the Equality Act 2010
- the SRA’s requirements on EDI under Principle 6 and CCS
- the SRA’s guidance note on its approach to EDI
- how most employers have a policy on EDI
Before working through this element, please read the SRA’s Guidance on its approach to equality, diversity and inclusion which can be found on the SRA website here:
https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/ethics-guidance/guidance-on-the-sra-s-approach-to-equality-diversity-and-inclusion/
Meaning of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
What do equality, diversity and inclusion mean?
Equality is about making sure there is a level playing field and people are treated fairly.
Diversity is about encouraging and valuing people with a broad range of different backgrounds, knowledge, skills and experiences.
Inclusion is about accepting people for who they are and encouraging everyone to participate and contribute.
Importance of EDI
The SRA states that EDI is important for many reasons, including:
The effective administration of justice. A diversity of views and approaches, whether in law firms or the judiciary, support an independent justice system and maintains the rule of law.
Improving access to services. Some people may be more likely to seek legal help from solicitors with whom they share some social or cultural characteristics.
Allowing the most talented people to become solicitors and progress in their careers which helps to maintain high standards.
Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act 2010 protects people from discrimination in the workplace and in wider society against the following protected characteristics:
- age
- disability
- gender reassignment
- marriage and civil partnership
- pregnancy and maternity
- race
- religion or belief
- sex
- sexual orientation
Legislation sets minimum legal obligations, eg that an employer takes steps to remove potential discrimination, harassment and victimisation. The SRA’s obligations extend beyond strict compliance with the law.
SRA requirements relating to EDI
What are the SRA’s requirements on EDI?
Principle 6: You must act in a way that encourages equality, diversity and inclusion.
CCS 1.1 ‘You do not unfairly discriminate by allowing your personal views to affect your professional relationships and the way in which you provide your services.’
CCS 1.2 ‘You do not abuse your position by taking unfair advantage of clients or others.’
CCS 3.4 ‘You consider and take account of your client’s attributes, needs and circumstances.’
Guidance on the SRA’s approach to EDI
The SRA has issued a guidance note to help firms and individuals understand their obligations on EDI. You must:
Provide reasonable adjustments to disabled clients and employees to make sure they are not at a substantial disadvantage compared to those that are not disabled. You must not pass on the costs of providing these adjustments to others. Encourage diversity at all levels of the workforce.Collect, report and publish data about the diversity of your workforce.
Uphold the reputation of the profession in your professional and personal life and treat people fairly and with dignity and respect. You should ensure your personal views do not have a negative impact on others. This includes expressing extreme personal, moral or political opinions on social media.Be fair and inclusive in your interactions with people you meet and deal with in the course of your work.
Guidance on the SRA’s approach to EDI
Firms must:
· have a complaints procedure and make sure complaints including those of discrimination, harassment and victimisation are dealt with promptly, fairly and effectively.
Firms and other employers may wish to:
· produce a statement about EDI for their workforce, clients and the people they work with.
Monitor and analyse the diversity of their staff and clients.Draft and implement an EDI policy outlining the employer’s approach to recruitment, retention and progression and to encourage equality of opportunity and respect for diversity.Attract the best staff: have a recruitment policy and fair process for promotions to maximise the chances of getting and retaining the best people for each role.
Summary
EDI is important for many reasons including the effective administration of justice, improving access to legal services and allowing the most talented people to progress in their legal careers.The Equality Act 2010 imposes legal obligations to protect people from discrimination.The SRA’s obligations extent beyond strict compliance with the law.The key requirements are contained in Principle 6, CCS 1.1, 1.2 and 3.4.The SRA’s document Guidance on the SRA’s approach to EDI contains further guidance on solicitors’ obligations in relation to EDI.All employers should have an EDI policy
Undertakings and dealings with the court
In this element we will consider:
- what an undertaking is;
- the SRA’s requirements in relation to undertakings;
- good practice in relation to giving undertakings;
- the SRA’s requirement that solicitors do not mislead the court; and
- the SRA’s requirement to ensure that solicitors conduct themselves properly before the court and comply with their overriding duty to the court.
SRA Principles
The rules on undertakings and dealings with the court stem from the following SRA Principles requiring solicitors to act:
Principle 1: in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law, and the proper administration of justice.
Principle 2: in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors’ profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.
Principle 3: with independence
Principle 4: with honesty
Principle 5: with integrity
What is an undertaking?
An “undertaking” is defined in the SRA Glossary as:
‘a statement, given orally or in writing, whether or not it includes the word ‘undertake’ or ‘undertaking’ to someone who reasonably places reliance on it, that you or a third party will do something or cause something to be done, or refrain from doing something’.
Undertakings are also often used to overcome practical difficulties in many areas of practice to smooth the path of a transaction or to speed up its progress. Undertakings are given and accepted, because solicitors are professional persons whose word is to be relied upon.
Examples of undertakings include:
- an undertaking by a seller’s solicitor in a property transaction to forward part of the sale proceeds to procure the discharge of the seller’s mortgage on the property;
- an undertaking to the court that a document will be filed on behalf of a client by a particular date;
- an undertaking to hold money to another firm’s order prior to the occurrence of a specific event.
CCS 1.3 on undertakings
Paragraph 1.3 of the Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs (‘CCS’) states:
CCS 1.3: You perform all undertakings given by you, and do so within an agreed timescale or if no timescale has been agreed then within a reasonable amount of time.
Warning:
- Failure to perform an undertaking can be a serious disciplinary offence, with the solicitor(s) concerned being investigated by the SRA for professional misconduct.
CCS 1.3 on undertakings
- An undertaking can be given by any individual in a law firm provided it can be reasonably relied upon by the recipient. An undertaking could be given by a partner, a qualified lawyer, an apprentice, secretary or any other individual in the firm.
- An undertaking does not have to be given in writing. An oral statement can amount to an undertaking.
- The word ‘undertaking’ does not have to be said or written for a statement to amount to an undertaking. Junior solicitors should be wary when promising to deliver copies or originals of documents to a third party: NEVER promise to do something which is outside your control.
Undertakings: Good practice
- It is advisable for law firms to maintain an effective system of recording when undertakings have been given and when they have been discharged.
- Firms will usually have procedures in place to procure that undertakings are complied with. For example, if your firm gives an undertaking to pay another firm’s costs, your firm will usually require your client to put the firm in funds to cover the relevant amount before you give the undertaking. In such circumstances, electronic accounting safeguards will be put in place so that the money reserved to cover the undertaking is not inadvertently used on the client’s behalf to pay for something else.
Undertakings: Good practice
- Firms often distinguish between everyday transactional undertakings and undertakings to pay another party’s costs. Firms will usually have internal policies as to who can give the latter type of undertaking, which is often restricted to partners or senior lawyers only.
- Undertakings are specifically enforceable, so most firms will try to maintain a register of undertakings given, recording what has been promised to whom and by who.