Challenges To Charlses Abritary Gov Flashcards
How was the relationship between Charles and parliment characterised between 25-29
- Early in to his reign charles looked to want little to do with his government and disagreed with them often over their extent of collaboration
- This worried his gov who felt he wanted to establish an absolutist monarch
- Rather, Charles felt parliment was entitled and arrogant
Why does Charles call parliment in 25
- to equip a war with Spain- needing about a million.
-He expected one off payments (subsidies) and his right to Collect tonnage and poundage
What was tonnage and poundage
- tax on imports and exports,
- used to support the navy and ensuring trading ships could cross the waters,
- per ‘ton’ of wine and ‘pound’ of products,
- awarded by parliment,
- usually confirmed once at the beginning of a reign
What how did parliment respond to charlses call in 25
- parliment granted him one year of t&p and 140,000 (2 subsidies)
- This was not enough to fund his war with Spain
Why did parliment give charles insufficient money
- they felt he had a bad Buckingham influenced foreign policy and wanted to show a lack of faith.
- Buckingham was politically over dominant and incompetent and as high admiral would benefit from t&p.
- They felt charlses conduct was inept after the 1624 Mansfield expedition.
- They were frustrated by the allowance of Catholics in the marriage treaty
What was the impact of parliment refusing charles money
- Charles ignored parliment for a year and ignored the one year limit on t&p as it attacked his royal perogative
- As well as this it was a striking blow to Buckingham.
- He then asked for a benevolent gift of money repaid by his perogative.
- When this failed in 26 he enforced a forced loan
What was the forced loan
- all wealthy would have to contribute to charlses loan, worth 5 subsidies.
- As this meeting to hand over money was so public any refusal was seen as disloyalty and opposition to the king.
Direct opposition to the forced loan
-there was a substantial amount of anonymous outrage.
- Thomas scot, attacked in print Buckingham and the king- stating that the king was unworthy and his commands outisde of what was normal of the duty of his people and that the king was evil to defend such wicked subjects it caused a rift between himself and parliment.
- Some of the judges refused to endorse the forced loan.
- Archbishop goerge abbot refused to license a sermon defnding the loan which made it seem the church felt it was the duty of the people to pay.
- 76 gentry refused to pay
Outcome of the opposition to the forced loan
- Charles imprisoned 76 gentry who didn’t pay without a specific offense
- 5 knights in 27 called the legal principal of imprisonment without charge (haebeus corpus) and so had to be taken to trial, causing heightened controversy over the principles of the kings loan and his ability to jail opponents in an arbitrary manner
What is calvinism
- the central and earliest puritans theology
- based on ideas by John Calvin.
- God predetermined who would follow a god believing path and who wouldn’t on earth.
What is Arminianism
Arminianism theology-
- based on ideas by Jacobus Arminius. - - -God gave us free will to choose in our lives to be godly and be saved by god.
What is Catholicism
god let’s us ALL be saved but also gives us free will to chose not to be if we wish.
Rise and controversy of Arminianism
-Arminianism Protestants didn’t have the same theology and so many felt that they were too close to cstholics and so were misguided or part of a plot toundermine the Church of England and return to Roman Catholicism.
- Arminians were beginning to rise into influential positions within the Church of England in the 1620s
Religious distribution in parliment
-parliment was majority puritan and at that majority Calvinist.
- They were lead by John Pym.
- There were also arminians and anglicans.
- Arminians appealed to charles as they chimed with div right ideas and liked dignity and order and supported the forced loan whilst calvinists typically did not
What was the york house conference
- chaired by the Duke of Buckingham at his London home
- Feb 26
- a theological debate requested by the Puritan Earl of Warwick
- Key Puritan nobles, including Warwick and Buckingham’s rival, the Earl of Pembroke, attended, while Arminians, like Richard Montagu, represented the opposing side.