CH.4 SEC.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS + PAYMENT OR PERFORMANCE Flashcards
“Art. 1231. Obligations are extinguished:
(1) […];
(2) […];
(3) […];
(4) […];
(5) […];
(6) […].
Other causes of extinguishment of obligations, such as […], […], […], and […], are governed elsewhere in this Code. “
“Art. 1231. Obligations are extinguished:
(1) By payment or perfromance;
(2) By the loss of the thing due;
(3) By the condonation or remission of the debt;
(4) By the confusion or merger of the rights creditor and debtor;
(5) By compensation;
(6) By novation.
Other causes of extinguishment of obligations, such as annulment, rescission, fulfillment of a resolutory condition, and prescription, are governed elsewhere in this Code. “
What is the first form of extinguishment of an obligation?
Payment or performance (Sec. 1 Ch. 4 Extinguishment of Obligations)
Art. 1232. Payment means not only the delivery of money but also […].
Art. 1232. Payment means not only the delivery of money but also the performance, in any other manner, of an obligation.
Art. 1232
“Key word: Definition of payment
Art. 1232. Payment means not only the delivery of money but also the performance, in any other manner, of an obligation.”
What is the meaning of payment according to the civil code?
“Art. 1232 of the Civil Code provides that payment means:
(1) Delivery of money; or
(2) Performance of an obligation [the giving of a thing, the doing of an act, or not doing of an act].”
Art. 1233. A debt shall not be understood to have been paid […], as the case may be.
Art. 1233. A debt shall not be understood to have been paid unless the thing or service in which the obligation consists has been completely delivered or rendered, as the case may be.
Art. 1233.
“Key word: When a debt shall be understood to have been paid
Art. 1233. A debt shall not be understood to have been paid unless the thing or service in which the obligation consists has been completely delivered or rendered, as the case may be.”
What are the requisites of the extinguishment of an obligation?
“The two requisites in extinguishing an obligation are:
(1) Integrity of the prestation - the prestation must be delivered or performed in full (Art. 1233); and
(2) Identity of the prestation - the very prestation due must be delivered or performed (Art. 1244).”
Can an obligation be extinguished through partial performance?
It depends. As a general rule, a debt is not understood to have been paid unless the prestation of the obligation has been fully delivered or performed (Art. 1233). However, when the obligor has substantially complied with the prestation, he may recover as if there was strict and complete performance of the obligation, less damages suffered by the creditor (Art. 1234). Furthermore, when the obligee accepts, with full knowledge and no expression of protest, the obligation which is merely partially fulfilled, then the obligation is deemed fully complied with (Art. 1235).
To whom does the burden of proof rest that the payment has been made?
“The burden of proving the extinguishment by payment devolves upon the debtor who claims payment.
When the existence of a debt is admitted by the debtor, or established by the evidence of the creditor, the burden of proving extinguishment by payment devolves upon the debtor who claims payment.
Only when the debtor introduces evidence that his obligation has been paid or extinguished does the burden shift to the creditor.”
Art. 1234. If the obligation has been substantially performed in good faith, […], less […].
Art. 1234. If the obligation has been substantially performed in good faith, the oblilgor may recover as though there had been a strict and complete fulfillment, less damages suffered by the obligee.
While Art. 1233, the requirement that a prestation must be fully delivered in order to extinguish an obligation, is the general rule. There is an exception established in Art. 1234. What is that exception?
The exception is in case of substantial performance, an obligation is extinguished as if there had been strict and complete fulfillment. In this case, the obligor is entitled to recover whatever is due to him less damages suffered by the obligee (Art. 1234).
What are the requisites for substantial performance?
“The requisites for substantial performance are:
(1) There must be substantial performance;
(2) The obligor must be in good faith.”
When is there substantial performance in the performance of an obligation?
There is substantial performance when the important or essential part of the contract has been performed and only a small or minor part thereof has not been carried out. [De Leon, 2021 ed., p. 188]
Art. 1235. When the obligee […], knowing its incompleteness or irregularity, and […], the obligation is deemed fully complied with.
Art. 1235. When the obligee accepts the performance, knowing its incompleteness or irregularity, and without expressing any protest or objection, the obligation is deemed fully complied with.
Another exception to the general rule of complete performance is admitted by Art. 1235. This exception is aside from the doctrine of substantial performance. What is this second exception?
The exception provided by Art. 1235 is when the creditor accepts the performance, even if he knows that it was incomplete or irregular, and he accepts it without any protest or objection, an obligatio is deemed fully complied with. This is an exception to the general rule laid down in Art. 1233 that the prestation must be fully complied with in order to fulfill the obligation.
What are the requisites for the application of Art. 1235– acceptance with knowledge of incompleteness?
“The requisites for the application of Art. 1235 are:
(1) The obligee knows that the performance is incomplete or irregular; and
(2) He accepts the performance without expressing any protest or objection. “
What is the principle of estoppel?
Oxford languages dictionary: Estoppel is the principle which precludes a person from asserting something contrary to what is implied by a previous action or statement of that person or by a previous pertinent judicial determination.
What are the options of the creditor in case of incomplete and/or irregular performance by the debtor?
“The creditor may:
(1) reject the delivery of the irregular or incomplete prestation (Art. 1233); or
(2) accept it with full knowledge and waive his right to demanding complete performance (Art. 1235).”
“Art. 1236. The creditor is not bound to accept payment or performance by a third person […], unless […].
Whoever pays for another may demand from the debtor what he has paid, except that if […], he can recover only […].”
“Art. 1236. The creditor is not bound to accept payment or performance by a third person who has no interest in the fulfillment of the obligation, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary.
Whoever pays for another may demand from the debtor what he has paid, except that if he paid without the knowledge or against the will of the debtor, he can recover only insofar as the payment has been beneficial to the debtor.”
When is a creditor bound to accept the payment of a thrid person who has no interest in the fulfillment of the obligation?
The creditor is bound to accept the payment or performance by a third person who has no interest in the fulfillment of the obligation when there is a stipulation providing for such. (Art. 1236)
What is the remedy of the third party who has made payment in behalf of a debtor?
“The third party may:
(1) demand from the debtor what he has paid (provided he paid with the consent of the debtor); or
(2) if payment was made without consent of the debtor, recovery only insofar as the payment had been beneficial to the debtor. (the remaining amount is to be recovered from the creditor). (Art. 1236)”
Who are the persons whom the creditor is bound to accept payment or performance?
“The creditor is bound to accept payment or performance from the following:
(1) the debtor;
(2) Any person who has an interest in the obligation (like a guarantor); or
(3) A third person who has no interest in the obligation when there is stipulation that he can make payment (Art. 1236 par. 1)”
Art. 1237. Whoever pays on behalf of the debtor without the knowledge or against the will of the latter, […], such as those arising from a mortgage, guaranty, or penalty.
Art. 1237. Whoever pays on behalf of the debtor without the knowledge or against the will of the latter, cannot compel the creditor to subrogate him in his rights, such as those arising from a mortgage, guaranty, or penalty.
What is the difference between subrogation and reimubrsement?
“In subrogation, the effect is merely a change in creditor. The person who paid the amount in behalf of the debtor is entitled to exercise all the rights of the creditor pertaining to the obligation. The payor may exercise rights against the debtor or against third persons, be they guarantors or possesor of mortgages. The right of the creditor is, in a sense, transmitted to the payor.
In reimbursement, there is no transfer of rights. The payor is only entitled to be repaid for the amount which the debtor has benefited without the right to the guarantees and securities of the obligation.
Lastly, in subrogation, there is no real extinction of the obligation, but only a change of creditor.”