Ch.4, Attention Flashcards

1
Q

Selective Attention:

A

ability to focus on one thing and tune out another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Distraction:

A

one stimulus interfering with the process of another stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Divided Attention

A

paying attention to more than oen thing at once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Attentional Capture:

A

rapid shifting of attention usually caused by a sudden stimulus (loud noise, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Wundt’s View of Attention:

A

said we needed to withdraw from some things in order to deal effectively with others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cocktail Party Effect:

A

people are able to focus on one conversation even when many conversations are happening around them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Broadbent’s Early Selection Filter Model of Attention

A

Broadbent’s Early Selection: proposed the filter, we block all of the other distracting streams/don’t process much at all of anything that is distracting: MULTIPLE SENSORY INPUT REACH ATTENTIONAL FILTER, WHICH PERMITS ONLY ONE CHANNEL OF SENSORY INFO TO PROCEED TO REACH PROCESS OF PERCEPTION, BUT BLOCKS ALL OTHERS
Problem: not applicable to all, we do perceive unattended messages and theyre not totally blocked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Detector:

A

processes the info from the attended message to determine higher level characteristics of the message, such as its meaning
OUTPUT OF DETECTOR — sent to short term memory and then transfers into long term memory, which can hold info indefinitely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Moray’s Dichotic Listening Experiment

A

Used attended vs. unattended method, but about a third of participants could detect their name being said in the unattended message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Treisman, Attenuation Model of Attention

A

Proposed that selection occurs in two stages, replaced Broadbent’s filter with an attenuator
Attenuator: analyzes the incoming message in terms of its physical characteristics, (fast vs slow) its language (how the message groups into syllables), and its meaning (how the words are meaningful )
Language and meaning can be used to separate the messages: the analysis of a message proceeds only as far as needed to identify the difference between attended message and unattended message
Called the “leaky filter” model because at least some of the unattended message gets through the attenuator, unlike Broadbent’s model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dictionary Unit:

A

contains words, stored in memory, each of which has a threshold for being activated (DETECTOR DOESN’T HAVE THRESHOLD)
A listener’s name would have a low threshold, so that even a weak signal in the unattended channel can activate that word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Mackay Late Selection Model

A

Proposed that most incoming info is processed to the needed level of meaning before the message to be further processed is selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Processing Capacity:

A

amount of info people can handle and sets a limit on their ability to process incoming information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Perceptual Load:

A

related to the difficulty of the task
Low Load Tasks: use a very small amount of person’s processing capacity
High Load Tasks: use much more of the person’s processing capacity
When carrying out a high load task, you are less likely to be distracted because no processing capacity remains

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stroop Effect:

A

names of words cause a competing response and therefore slow responding to the target
(identifying the colors of names that are spelled)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Central vs. peripheral vision

A

Central Vision: the area you are looking at
Peripheral Vision: everything off to the side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Saccadic Eye Movement

A

Saccadic Eye Movements: rapid, jerky movement from one fixation to the next

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Overt Attention vs covert attention

A

OVERT: moving eyes, shifting attention from one place to another;
Covert attention: NO eye movements and during fixation, it can be deployed to multiple locations simultaneously. covert visual attention is related to a mental shift of attention without physical movement. Covert attention precedes eye movements and during fixation, it can be deployed to multiple locations simultaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Stimulus saliency and map

A

Stimulus Salience: physical properties of a stimulus
Saliency Map: involves analyizing orientation, color, and intensity at each location in a scene, first fixations usually occur on high salience stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Scene Schemas:

A

top down processing comes into play when scanning is influenced by these, an observer’s knowledge about what is typically contained in a scene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Precuing

A

whether presenting a cue indicating where a test stimulus will appear enhances the processing of the target stimulus (it does)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Attentional Warping:

A

map of categories on the brain changes so more space is allotted to categories that are being searched for; this effect occurs when the attended category isnt even present in the movie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Continous Partial Attention:

A

constant switching from one activity to another

24
Q

Inattentional blindness and deafness

A

Occurs when people are unaware of clearly viosible stimuli if they aren’t directing their attention at it
Inattentional Deafness: can also be extended to hearing

25
Change blindness and continuity errors
Change Blindness: difficulty detecting changes in a scene Continuity Errors: changes in movies that we don’t notice because we’re not focused on them
26
Binding:
process by which features such as color, form, motion and location are combined to create our perception of a coherent object
27
Feature Integration Theory Process, Parallel and Serial Search
-Preattentive stage: detects basic features of the stimuli -Focused attention stage: combines the originally detected features (step 1) (BINDING) Leads to the perception of the object Paralell search is pre-attentive: you can look at all objects at once (in parallel) and spot the target Serial Search: attention is now needed to BIND all features, must look at each individual object to determine the target https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94quZngBk1w&t=200s
28
Illusory Conjuctions:
combination of features from different stimuli, accidentaly applying the features of one stimulus to another; This feature-integration theory predicts that when attention is diverted or overloaded, features may be wrongly recombined, giving rise to “illusory conjunctions.” . For instance, subjects might be presented a red triangle and a green circle in a visual display, but experience illusory conjunctions: a green triangle and a red circle.
29
Ventral vs. dorsal attention netowrk
Ventral Attention Network: controls attention based on salience (physical features of a stimuli) Dorsal Attention Network: controls attention based on top-down processing
30
Attention according to James
James: taking possession by the mind, in clear and vivid form, of one out of what seem several simultaneously possible objects or trains of thought; focalization, concentration of consciousness are its essence
31
Precuing valid trial and invalid trial
Valid Trial: cue is predicting location of the target properly Invalid Trial: cue tricks the viewer by wrongly predicting the location
32
Attentional Resource Theory
Single pool of attentional resources that can be divided up among multiple tasks requiring different modalities, therefore we have to determine which tasks we want to center our attention on Limited pool of resources
33
Deutsch Model
Filtering occurs after some perceptual and conceptual analysis, allowing one to recognize information entering unattended ear Only main relevant info goes to be encoded into memory
34
VOLUNTARY Endogenous Attention:
conscious and willful decision to selectively attend to/scan for specific aspect of environment (CHOOSE TO PAY ATTENTION TO LECTURE)
35
INVOLUNTARY, common among people, Exogenous Attention:
automatic tendency of our attention to get drawn to eye-catching stimuli, does not require a conscious willful decision and just happens and generally happens outside conscious awareness, loud noises, threatening stimuli, faces
36
Involuntary, , common among people, Exogenous Attention:
automatic tendency of our attention to get drawn to eye-catching stimuli, does not require a conscious willful decision and just happens and generally happens outside conscious awareness, loud noises, threatening stimuli, faces
37
Cognitive Load
If focus is on a primary high load tsask, then even a secondary task with low load will decrease our performance on the high load task Talking on the phone will driving, effect is greater with higher traffic density
38
Switch Cost
general phenomen of performance being worse for a period of time immediately after a switch, better not to switch between
39
External Attention
stimulus-dependent on the outside world , task-related (SELECTIVE ATTENTION)
40
Mind wandering
Mind-Wandering: stimulus independent, NOT RELATED to tasks Not paying attention to task: often engage in Autobiographical memory recall (thinking about self in the past), decision-making, and abstract thinking
41
Autobiographical memory recall
(thinking about self in the past),
42
Positive outcomes of mind wandering
Positive outcomes: mind wandering can be conducive to ‘lightbulb” moments in problem solving context, gives your brain a ‘break’ from highly demanding tasks because focusing attention is like a ‘muscle’,
43
On task vs off task
On Task: attention directed to ongoing task Off Task: most research defines mind wandering in terms of off task, attention task-uNRELATED thoughts
44
aware vs not aware
Aware: awareness of where your attention is focused on Not Aware: lack of awareness where your attention is focused on
45
intentional vs unintentional
Intentional: FOCUS ON INIATION POINT***MOMENT YOU BEGIN TO INITIATE A THOUGHT, deliberately, with top-down control, orient attention to a thought (you can start a thought chain intentionally and then become unaware that you are still absorbed in it later) Unintentional: attention orients internally and spontaneously, with no exertion of control
46
freely moving vs constrained
Freely moving: thoughts that jump from one topic to another, THOUGHTS ARE UNRELATED Constrained: thoughts that are relatively focused on one topic, thoughts are related to one relative topic
47
Thought Sampling Lab Technique, measures, pros, cons
In context of task in lab: probes that ask if youre on task or mind wandering: interested whether this is happening in the exact moment (determine how often mind wandering occurs) MEASURES USED, Outcome Measures: frequency of measured attention, behaviour and EEG measures during mind-wandering PROS OF THOUGHT SAMPLING: direct measure reported by the participant in tha exact moment, not retrospectively CONS OF THOUGHT SAMPLING: subjective to the person, demand characteristics may play a role and participants don’t report honestly
48
Executive Function Model of Mind Wandering
Given limited executive resources, mind wandering draws resources away from the external task we are supposed to be focused on Predicts that mind wandering would lead to a definite disruption in these external processes Similar to the idea of limited attentional capacity ^^
49
Three H0's of the mind wandering study consequences
Distractibility H0: due to general failure to cope with distraction, task unrelated thoughts are associated with enhanced response to distractor stimuli (people who mind wander a lot, show a greater P3A TO DISTRACTOR),EASIER TO BE DISTRACTED Executive Control H0: due to failure in executive control TUT’s involve specific impairment in processing task relevant events (people who mind wander the most show reduced P3 to task relevant stimuli) IMPAIREMENT IN PROCESSING TASK RELEVANT EVENTS Decoupling H0: due to decoupling from perceptual info in environment, TUTS suppress response to external events regardless of their task relevance (people who mind wander a lot, show reduced front P3A to distractors and reduced P3B to targets) WORSE RESPONSE TO EXTERNAL EVENTS REGARDLESS OF TASK RELEVANCE
50
How was there support for the decoupling hypothesis in mind wandering?
Hypothesis confirmed: mind wandering suppressed response to rare stimuli regardless of their task relevance provides SUPPORT FOR DECOUPLING HYPOTHESIS
51
Mind wandering and mood
Generally people who were mind wandering is associated with lower positive mood: but the content of thought during mind wandering can enhance mood (especially if you were thinking about something interesting Freely moving thoughts that are jumping from one topic to another are associated with more positive mood
52
What functions engage default mode in the brain?
Mind wandering, self-referent thoughts, theory of mind (thinking about the mental state of others), autobiographical memory retrieval (thinking about self in the past) and future planning: ALL ENGAGE DEFAULT MODE NETWORK
53
Balint's Syndrome
Inability to focus attention on individual object
54
Local field potential
Reading from EEG activity
55
P3a and p3b responses in mind wandering
Distractibility H0 o high MW group would show enhanced frontal P3a response to distractor stimuli. * Executive Control H0: o high MW group would show reduced parietal P3b response to task-relevant target stimuli. * Decoupling H0: o high MW group would show reduced frontal P3a to distractors and reduced parietal P3b response to targets. OUTCOME: mind wandering was associated with reduced processing of both targets and novel distractors; SUPPORT FOR DECOUPLING HYPOTHESIS