ch3: perceiving ourselves and others Flashcards
self-concept
an individual’s self-beliefs and self-evaluations
which levels is the self-concept defined at
individual (personal traits), relational (connections to friends and coworkers) and collective (other entities)
what are the three components of an individual self
complexity, consistency, clarity
complexity
the number of distinct and important roles or identities that people perceive about themselves
Everyone sees themselves in different roles at various times
Self-expansion – increasing one’s complexity by seeking out new opportunities and social connections
Also defined by the separation of different identities – if they’re highly interconnected that might lead to low self-esteem
Complexity is higher when the multiple identities have a low correlation with one another (distinct spheres of life)
A particular self-view is usually domain specific – more likely to be activated in some settings than others
consistency
the degree to which the individual’s identities require similar personal attributes
High consistency – individual’s identities are compatible with one another and with their actual personality traits, values and other attributes
Low consistency – when some self-views require personal attributes that conflict with attributes required for other self-views + when an individual’s dominant self-concept identities are incompatible with their personal attributes
clarity
the degree to which a person’s self-concept is clear, confidently defined, and stable
When someone is confident about who they are, can describe their important identities to others, and provide the same description of themselves across time
Increases through self-reflection, people who live in other cultures engage in more self-reflection + clearer when a person’s multiple selves have higher consistency (low consistency produces ambiguity about a person’s underlying characteristics)
when’s psychological well-being higher
among those with distinct multiple selves (complexity), that are well-established (clarity) and require similar personal attributes that are compatible with the individual’s character (consistency)
o Self-concept complexity protects self-esteem when some roles are damaged or threatened
o Self-concept complexity helps people adapt, but too much variation causes internal tension and conflict
- Well-being also increases with self-concept clarity
o Those who’re unsure of their self-views are more easily influenced by others, experience more stress when making decisions, and feel more threatened by social forces that undermine their self-confidence and self-esteem
how are employees with complex identities
more adaptive decision making and performance – multiple selves generate more diverse experiences and role patterns (can alter their thinking and behaviour to suit new tasks and work environments)
problem with high complexity
complex self-concepts require more effort to maintain and juggle which can be stressful
Low complexity (define themselves by their work) – better performance due to more investment in skill development, longer hours, more concentration on work, lower absenteeism and turnover
why does clarity improve performance and why is it bad for it
o Less threatened by interpersonal conflict (more constructive problem-solving behaviours)
o High clarity may lead to role inflexibility
four selves
self-enhancement, self-verification, self-evaluation, social self
self-enhancement
- People are inherently motivated to perceive themselves and be perceived as competent, attractive, lucky, ethical and important – self-enhancement
- Individuals tend to rate themselves above average, believe that they have a better than average probability of success, and attribute their successes to personal motivation or ability while blaming the situation for their mistake
o Ex: 70% of students believe their academic performance is above average, 62% say that they have above-average leadership ability - Individuals tend to experience better mental and physical health when they amplify their self-concept + “can-do” attitude
o Negative side: self-enhancement causes people to overestimate future returns in investment decisions and engage in unsafe behaviour + responsible for executives repeating poor decisions, launching misguided corporate diversification strategies, acquiring excessive corporate debt
self-verification
a person’s inherent motivation to confirm and maintain their existing self-concept
- When a person’s identity as a leader is questioned by others, the leader applies self-verification strategies (making their role performance more visible, adopting a les threatening style of that self-view, directly confronting those who doubt or disagree with their identity as a leader)
- Unlike self-enhancement, self-verification includes seeking feedback that isn’t necessarily flattering
o Do we prefer compliments rather than accurate critique about weaknesses that we readily acknowledge?
- Affects the perceptual processes because employees are more likely to remember information that is consistent with their self-concept and nonconsciously screen out information that seems inconsistent with it
- People with high self-concept clarity will consciously dismiss feedback that contradicts their self-concept
- Employees are motivated to interact with others how affirm their self-views
self-evolution
- Defined by self-esteem, self-efficacy, locus of control
- Self-esteem – the extent to which people like, respect, and are satisfied with themselves
o People have degrees of self-esteem for each of their various roles – form an overall evaluation of themselves (global self-esteem)
o High self-esteem – less influenced by others, tend to persist in spite of failure, have higher propensity to think logically - Self-efficacy – a person’s belief that they have the ability, motivation, correct role perception, and favorable situation to complete a task successfully
o High self-efficacy leads to a “can-do” attitude – believe they possess the energy (motivation), ability, clear expectations (role perceptions) and resources (situational factors)
o Often task specific, but it can also be more generalized - Locus of control – a person’s general belief about the amount of control they have over personal life events
o Internal – believe that life events are caused mainly by their personal characteristics
More positive self-evaluation + perform better in most employment situations, are more successful in their careers, earn more money, are better suited for leadership positions
More satisfied with their jobs, cope better in stressful situations, and are more motivated by performance-based reward systems
o External – events are mainly due to fate, luck, other external factors
o Most apparent in new situations where their ability to control events is uncertain
the social self
- Two opposing human motives that influence how humans view themselves
- Motivation to be distinctive and different from other people
o Personal identity/internal self-concepts – fulfils the need for distinctiveness because it involves defining ourselves by our personality, values, abilities, qualifications, achievements, other personal attributes - Motivation for inclusion and assimilation with other people
o The relational and collective self-concepts fulfil the fundamental need for affiliation – involve both interaction and interdependence with others
o Social identity or external self-concept - Social identity theory – a theory stating that people define themselves by the groups to which they belong or have an emotional attachment
- One factor that determines importance of memberships – how easily you’re identified as a member of the reference group + your minority status in the group + the group’s status
perception
– the process of receiving information about and making sense of the world around us
o Determining which information to notice, how to categorize this information, how to interpret it within the framework of our existing knowledge
when does perception begin
when environmental stimuli are received through our senses, some things are screened out, the rest are organized and interpreted
selective attention
the process of attending to some information received by our senses and ignoring other information
o Influenced by characteristics of the person or object being perceived (size, intensity, motion, repetition, novelty)
o Characteristics of the perceiver also influence – without the perceiver’s awareness – our brain quickly and nonconsciously assesses whether it’s relevant or irrelevant and then attaches emotional markers (help us store information in memory)
confirmation bias
the processing of screening our information that is contrary to our values and assumptions, and to more readily accept confirming information
o Pay attention to information that supports that decision, ignore information that questions the wisdom of the decision, and more easily recall the supportive than the opposing information
o Ex: student pilots became unsure of their location – tried to find their true location by relying on less reliable information that was consistent with their assumptions
categorical thinking
organizing people and objects into preconceive categories that are stored in our long-term memory
o People are usually grouped together based on their observable similarity + by their proximity to one another
what’s the second perceptual grouping process
organizes incoming information – fills out in the missing pieces of the puzzle
o Everyone has a need for cognitive closure -> assumptions about missing information by relying on past images and experiences in those situations
example for a tendency to see patterns in random events
incorrectly believe that a sports player or gambler with a string of wins is more likely to win the next time as well
trustworthiness experiment
o We make judgements about another individual’s trustworthiness after viewing a facial image for as little as 50ms
o Whether we see a face for a minute or just 200ms our opinion about their trustworthiness stays the same
mental models
knowledge structures that we develop to describe, explain, an predict the world around us
o Partly rely on the process of perceptual grouping to make sense of things, fill in the missing pieces (including the causal connection among events)
o Make it difficult to see the world in different ways – block our recognition of new opportunities