ch2: individual behavior Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

personality

A

the relatively enduring pattern of thoughts, emotions, and behaviours that characterize a person, along with the psychological processes behind those characteristics
o The bundle of characteristics that make us similar to or different from other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

personality trait

A

broad concepts that allow us to label and understand individual differences
o Something within the person, rather than the environment, that predicts this behavioural tendency
o Individual’s personality traits measured in childhood predict many behaviours and outcomes in adulthood – educational attainment, employment success, marital relationships, illegal activities, health-risk behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how is personality shaped

A

o By nature – genetic and hereditary origins – 50% of variations in behaviour and 30% of temperament preferences can be attributed to a person’s genes
o By nurture – socialization, life experiences, other forms of interaction with the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how does personality change

A

from childhood to young adulthood – stabilizes at 30 (we form a clearer and more rigid self-concept + executive function)
o A few traits (openness to new experiences, social vitality) – increase through to young adulthood, decline in later years
o Agreeableness, conscientiousness tend to increase through to late life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

big five

A

the five broad dimensions representing most personality traits: conscientiousness, emotional stability, openness to experience, agreeableness and extraversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conscientiousness

A

people who’re organized, dependable, goal-focused, thorough, disciplined, methodical, industrious
o Those with low conscientiousness – carless, disorganized, less thorough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

agreeableness

A

trusting, helpful, good-natured, considerate, tolerant, selfless, generous, flexible
o Low – uncooperative, intolerant of others’ needs, suspicious and self-focused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

neuroticism

A

anxious, insecure, self-conscious, depressed, temperamental
o Low – poised, secure, calm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

openness to experience

A

imaginative, creative, unconventional, curious, nonconforming, autonomous, aesthetically perceptive
o Low – resistant to change, less open to new ideas, more conventional and fixed in their ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

extraversion

A

outgoing, talkative, energetic, sociable, assertive + get energy from people and things around them
o Introversion – quiet, cautious, less interactive with others + energy from personal reflection on concepts and ideas, feel more comfortable being alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how does personality affect behavior

A

through motivation – influencing direction and intensity of effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

conscientiousness in the workplace

A

best overall personality predictor of proficient task performance
o Industriousness (achievement, self-discipline, purposefulness) and dutifulness – best predictors of proficient task performance
o Conscientious employees set higher personal goals, more persistent + engage in more organizational citizenship and less counterproductive work behaviour
o Weak predictor of adaptive (responding to change) and proactive performance (taking initiative toward new work patterns)
o Orderliness and dependability – suppress adaptivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

extraversion in the workplace

A

second best overall personality predictor of proficient task performance, much weaker than conscientiousness
o Assertiveness and positive emotionality – strongest predictors of proficient task performance
o Assertiveness – strong predictor of adaptive and proactive performance
 Take charge, approach situations
o Influencing others and being comfortable in social settings – effective leaders and sales-people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

agreeableness in the workplace

A

positively associated with most forms of organizational citizenship and negatively associated with counterproductive work behaviours
o Employees with high agreeableness – more cooperative, sensitive, flexible, supportive
o Doesn’t predict proficient or proactive tasks – lower motivation to set goals and achieve results
o Higher (but not too high) – improve team performance through better knowledge sharing and motivation to help others
o Positive effect on friendliness behaviour in customer service jobs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

openness to experience in the workplace

A

weak predictor of proficient task performance, but predictor of adaptive and proactive performance
o More curiosity, imagination, tolerance of change -> successful performance in creative work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

emotional stability in the workplace

A

best personality predictor of adaptive performance
o Cope better with the ambiguity and uncertainty of change
o Higher neuroticism – view change as a threat – avoid change and experience more stress when faced with workplace adjustments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

types of performance and predictors

A

o Proficient task performance – conscientiousness, extraversion
o Adaptive task performance – emotional stability, extraversion (assertiveness), openness to experience
o Proactive task performance – extraversion (assertiveness), openness to experience
o Organizational citizenship – conscientiousness, agreeableness
o CWB – low conscientiousness and low agreeableness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

issues with the big five

A
  1. Higher isn’t always better
    - The labels and structure of the big five have a strong linear bias (high is good, low is bad)
    - Best employees don’t have the highest scores on some personality factor – nonlinear
    o Those with moderate extraversion perform better in sales jobs that those with high or low extraversion
    - Students with the best peer-related contributions to teamwork have relatively high extraversion, but moderately high conscientiousness, around the mid-point on agreeableness
  2. Specific traits may be better predictors than the Big Five factors
  3. Personality isn’t static
    - Labelling people reinforces the fallacy that personality is static
  4. The five-factor model doesn’t cover all personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

the dark triad

A

a cluster of three socially undesirable (dark) personality traits – Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Machiavellians

A

a personality trait of people who demonstrate a strong motivation to achieve their own goals at the expense of others, who believe that deceit is a natural and acceptable way to achieve their goals, who take pleasure in outwitting and misleading others using crude influence tactics and who have a cynical disregard for morality
o Named after Niccolo Machivelli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

narcissism

A

a personality trait of people with a grandiose, obsessive belief in their superiority and entitlement, a propensity to aggressively engage in attention-seeking behaviours, an intense envy of others and tendency to exhibit arrogance, callousness, and exploitation of others for personal aggrandizement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

psychopathy

A

a personality trait of people who ruthlessly dominate and manipulate others without empathy or any feelings of remorse or anxiety, use superficial charm, yet are social predators who engage in antisocial, impulsive, and often fraudulent thrill-seeking behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what’s a core characteristic of the dark triad

A

dishonesty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

organizational politics

A

the use of influence tactics for personal gain at the perceived expense of others and the organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

counterproductive work behaviors

A

voluntary behaviours that have the potential to directly or indirectly harm the organization
o Low agreeableness and conscientiousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what’s the dark triad associated with

A

serious white-collar crimes
o A dark triad measure from video analysis was highly effective at identifying chef executive officers who were implicated in unethical misconduct and fraud
o Also associated with bullying and other forms of workplace aggression + tend to make decisions that produce poorer absolute and risk-adjusted investment returns
 Those with high psychopathy take excessive risk due to their overconfidence and disregard for consequences
- manipulative political skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

what’s the relationship between task performance and the dark triad

A
  • Complex relationship with other forms of task performance and career success – dysfunctional team members in the long term (don’t trust coworkers and focus on their own goals at the expense of team goals)
    o But do help others in the short run when it serves their self-interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

MBTI

A

an instrument designed to measure the elements of Jungian personality theory, particularly preferences regarding perceiving and judging information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Jung about personality

A

personality is mainly represented by the individual’s preferences regarding perceiving and judging information

30
Q

criticism of MBTI

A

test stability is below par, poor predictive validity of job performance, not recommended for employment selection or promotion decisions
o Can potentially identify employees who prefer face-to-face versus virtual teamwork, but doesn’t predict how well a team develops
- Knowing the job requirement is vital + often are self-reported + biased (different groups may respond differently)

31
Q

value

A

relatively stable, evaluative beliefs that guide a person’s preferences for outcomes or courses of action in a variety of situations

32
Q

value systems

A

hierarchy of preferences of values – stable and long lasting

33
Q

shared values

A

values of a team, department, profession, or entire society
o Organizational values, cultural values

34
Q

difference between values and personality traits

A

o Values are evaluative – tell us what we ought to do, personality traits describe what we naturally tend to do
o Personality traits have minimal conflict with each other, but some values are opposed to other values
o Values are influenced more by socialization whereas heredity has a stronger influence on an individual’s personality traits

35
Q

Schwartz’s values circumflex

A

57 values into 10 broad categories that are organized into a circular model

36
Q

ten categories of values

A

universalism, benevolence, tradition, conformity, security, power, achievement, hedonism, stimulation, self-direction

37
Q

quadrants of values

A

o Openness to change - how much is a person motivated to pursue innovative ways – creativity, independent thought
Self-direction (creativity, independent thought), stimulation (excitement and challenge), hedonism (pursuit of pleasure, enjoyment, gratification of desires)
o Conservation – motivated to preserve the status quo
Conformity, security (safety and stability), tradition (moderation and preservation of the status quo)
o Self-enhancement – motivated by self-interest
Achievement, power, hedonism
o Self-transcendence – motivated to promote welfare of others and nature
Benevolence (concern for others in one’s life), universalism (concern for the welfare of all people and nature)

38
Q

how do personal values influence decisions

A

o Directly motivate our actions by shaping the relative attractiveness of the choices available
o Indirectly motivate behaviour by framing our perception of reality – influence whether we notice something and how we interpret it
o We’re motivated to act consistently with our self-concept and public self-presentation

39
Q

why isn’t the people’s connection with values as strong as they would like to believe

A

o Situation can interfere with someone’s values
o People are often not aware of their values (they’re abstract concepts, their relevance isn’t obvious in many situations)

40
Q

values experiment

A

students given a math test and received a payment for each correct answer
o One group submitted their results for scoring (couldn’t cheat), a second group graded the tests themselves (could cheat), third group similar to the second one but students were required to sign their name to the statement “I understand that this short survey falls under honour system”
o No one given the honour system form lied about the result
o People are more likely to apply their values when they’re explicitly reminded of those values and see their relevance

41
Q

values congruence

A

how similar a person’s values hierarchy is to the values hierarchy of another entity (employee’s team or company)
o Increases the employee’s job satisfaction, loyalty and organizational citizenship
o Employees are more likely to make decisions that are compatible with organizational expectations

42
Q

how do organizations benefit from incongruence

A
  • no corporate cult
  • diversity of perspectives can lead to better decision making
43
Q

integrity

A

the leader’s ethical standards

44
Q

ethics

A

the study of moral principles or values that determine whether actions are right or wrong + outcomes good or bad

45
Q

four ethical principles

A

utilitarianism, individual rights, distributive justice, ethic of care

46
Q

utilitarianism

A

greatest good for the greatest number
o Problem – it requires a cost-benefit analysis, yet many outcomes aren’t measurable + could justify actions that other principles would consider immortal because those means produce the greatest good overall

47
Q

individual rights

A

everyone has same natural rights (freedom of movement, physical security, freedom of speech, fair trial)
o Problem: some individual rights may conflict with others

48
Q

distributive justice

A

benefits and burdens should be the same or proportional
o Variation: inequalities are acceptable when they benefit the least well off in society
o Problem: it’s difficult to agree on who is similar and what factors are relevant

49
Q

ethics of care

A

moral obligation to help close others
o The ethic of care is a practice, not a set of principle – attending to others’ needs, taking care of others through responsibility, giving care to others through one’s skills and abilities and by being responsive to the person receiving care

50
Q

what goes into the ethical conduct

A

Moral intensity, moral sensitivity, situational factors

51
Q

moral intensity

A

the degree to which an issue demands the application of ethical principle

52
Q

when is moral intensity higher

A

the consequences of the decision could be very good or bad, there is high agreement by others that the decision outcomes are good or bad, there is a high probability that the good or bad outcomes will occur, many people will experience the consequences of the decision

53
Q

moral sensitivity

A

a person’s ability to recognize the presence of an ethical issue and determine its relative importance
o High moral sensitivity – can more quickly and accurately estimate the moral intensity of the issue (doesn’t necessarily translate into ethical behaviour)

54
Q

when’s moral sensitivity higher

A

expertise or knowledge of prescriptive norms and rules, previous experience with specific moral dilemmas, ability to empathize with those affected by the decision (women have higher moral sensitivity), a strong self-view of being a morally sensitive person (employees with a strong moral identity tend to have higher moral sensitivity because they put more energy into maintaining ethical conduct), a high degree of situational mindfulness (mindfulness – a person’s receptive and impartial attention to and awareness of the present situation as well as to one’s own thoughts and emotions in that moment)

55
Q

what does mindfulness involve

A

o Mindfulness involves actively monitoring the environment as well as being sensitive to our responses to that environment
o Unfortunately, people have a natural tendency to minimize effort, which leads to less

56
Q

how many employees felt pressure to compromise their organization’s ethical standard

A

8% of UK and 13% of Continental EU employees felt pressure to compromise their organization’s ethical standards
o 8% of US and 14% of UK services and banking staff felt such pressure
o 23% among high-income finance/banking executives

57
Q

code of ethical conduct

A

– a statement about desired activities, rules of conduct and philosophy about the organization’s relationship to its stakeholders and the environment
o Motivate and guide employee behaviour, signal the importance of ethical conduct and build the firm’s trustworthiness to stakeholders, but do little to reduce unethical conduct

58
Q

other strategies to improve ethical conduct

A

train and regularly evaluate employees on their knowledge of proper ethical conduct
o Annual quizzes to test employee awareness and practices
o In some firms – moral dilemmas
- Moral telephone hotline – operated by an independent organization, where employees can anonymously report suspicious behaviour
o Ombudspersons – receive information confidentially from employees and investigate possible wrongdoings
- Most powerful foundation – set of shared values that reinforces ethical conduct
o By acting with the highest-moral standards, leaders gain support and trust + are role-models

59
Q

five values that have a cross cultural significance

A

individualism, collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, achievement-nurturing orientation

60
Q

individualism

A

a cross-cultural value describing the degree to which people in culture emphasize independence and personal uniqueness
o Personal freedom, self-sufficiency, control over their lives, being appreciated for unique qualities

61
Q

individualism countries

A
  • High individualism: US, Chile, Canada, South Africa
    o Low: Taiwan, Venezuela
    o Medium: Japan, Denmark
62
Q

collectivism

A

the degree to which people in a culture emphasize duty to groups to which they belong and to group harmony

63
Q

collectivism countries

A
  • High collectivism: Israel, Taiwan
    o Medium: India, Denmark
    o Low: US, Japan, Germany
64
Q

Japan - collectivism and individualism

A

low collectivism which is contrary to people’s beliefs
o Explanations for misinterpretation: problems defining and measuring collectivism, erroneous reporting of early research

65
Q

power distance

A

the degree to which people in a culture accept unequal distribution of power in society
- High power distance: value obedience to authority, accept superiors’ commands, prefer formal rules and authority to resolve conflicts
- Low power distance: expect relatively equal power sharing, view relationship with boss as interdependence, not dependence

66
Q

power distance countries

A
  • High: India, Malaysia
    o Low: Denmark, Israel
    o Medium: US, Japan
67
Q

uncertainty avoidance

A

the degree to which people in a culture tolerate ambiguity or feel threatened by ambiguity and uncertainty
- High – value structured situations in which rules of conduct and decision making are clearly documented, direct communication, feel threatened by ambiguity and uncertainty
- Low – tolerate ambiguity and uncertainty

68
Q

uncertainty avoidance countries

A
  • High: Belgium, Greece, Japan
    o Low: Denmark, Singapore
    o Medium: US, Norway
69
Q

caveats about cross-cultural knowledge

A
  • Too many studies relied on small, convenient samples (students of one university) to represent an entire culture – draw conclusions that might not generalize to the culture they intended to represent
  • Often assume that every country has one culture
  • Continues to rely on a major study conducted almost 4 decades ago of 116000 IBM employees – its findings are outdated as many cultures have shifted over the years
70
Q

cultural diversity in the us across ethnic groups

A

African Americans have much higher individualism than European and Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans have the lowest individualism among these groups

71
Q

differences between states

A
  • Collectivism is the highest across the southern states (California and Hawaii) and lowest in the Mountain, Northwest, and Great Plains
    o New England, Middle Atlantic and Pacific regions – high openness to experience but people living in the Great Plains and midwestern and south-eastern states have the lowest scores
    o Neuroticism is the highest in the Northeast and Southeast and lowest in the Midwest and West