ch.21 - parol evidence rule Flashcards

1
Q

what is parol evidence?

A

any extrinsic evidence - either oral or in writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when is the PER implicated?

A

when one party claims the contract has all of the terms of the agreement, and the other party claims that smth is missing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PER steps

A
  1. Written contract?
  2. Evidence being offered of smth agreed to prior to or contemporaneous w the execution of the agreement
  3. For what purpose is the evidence being offered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Modern Approach

A

Not limited to the four corners of the documents but will look at the surrounding circumstances and evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

classic approach

A

judges may only look at the “4 corners” of the agreement
- aka what is on the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

total integration

A
  • the writing is the final and complete agreement of the parties
  • all terms of the contract must have been combined
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

partial integration

A

document only reflects part of their agreement
although may have been intended to be final

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

no integration

A

the document was not intended to be final or compleye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

patent ambiguity

A

on its face the facts are ambiguous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

latent ambiguity

A

on its face the K does not seem ambiguous but in reality it is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is contradictory evidence?

A

evidence that conflicts with a term in the writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are consistent additional terms?

A
  • “supplemental evidence”
  • evidence that supplements the written agreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

interpretive evidence

A

parol evidence that that helps to interpret an ambiguous term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

consistent additional term

A

terms in harmony with the language and obligations of the party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

inconsistent term

A

term in absence of rsbl harmony in terms of the language and respective obligations of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PER 4 step analysis

A
  1. is the PER implicated?
  2. what is the integration?
  3. admissibility?
  4. do any exceptions apply?
17
Q

step 1:
is the PER implicated?

A
  1. Written K
  2. Prior to/contemporaneous
  3. Purpose? Add/change term
18
Q

step 2:
Integration?

A
  1. Total: doc reflects final and complete agreement
  2. Partial: final agreement to some of the terms but its not complete
  3. Not: not the final agreement of the parties
19
Q

Step 3:
Admissible?

A
  • Total = NOT admissible
  • Partial
    1. Inconsistent = NOT admissible
    2. Consistent = admissible
  • Not = Admissible
20
Q

Step 4:
Exceptions

A
  • only applicable if the answer to step 3 is NO
    1. Interpretation – ambiguity
    a. Classic – patent
    b. Modern – patent, latent
    2. Subsequent agreement
    3. Defenses
    a. Misrepresentation, mistake, etc
    4. Collateral agreement
    5. Condition precedent to formation