Ch.11 Failure to Create an Enforceable Contract Flashcards
Requirements for a valid contract:
-Offer and acceptance
-Capacity
-Consideration
-Legality of object
-Intention
-Form and writing
These may all exist but contract may still not be enforceable
Four situations which may render agreement unenforceable:
Mistake
Misrepresentation
Undue influence
Duress
Also determines who bears the brunt of a given loss
Mistake
state of affairs in which a party (or both parties) has formed an erroneous opinion as to identify of subject matter, or some other important term
-Contract does not express their true intentions
Types of mistakes:
Mistake of law
Mistake of fact
Mistake of law:
Presumed to know the law
Usually no relief provided by court
Mistake of fact
mistake as to the existence of the subject matter of a contract or the identity of a party
- Court may provide relief depending on if mistake was in subject matter of contract or in identity of parties
Non Est Factum
defence that may allow illiterate or infirm persons to avoid liability on a written agreement if they can establish that they:
- Were not aware of the true nature of the document, and
- Were not careless in its execution
Narrow form of mistake
Applies only to type of agreement being signed not to the terms of the agreement
Mistake may take one of two forms:
- Unilateral mistake
- Mutual mistake
Can be same mistake or different mistakes
Courts will not enforce agreements when the other party is aware of the mistake being made
Unilateral mistake
mistake by one party to the agreement
Mutual mistake
mistake where both parties have made mistaken assumptions as to the subject matter of the agreement
Rectification
correction of a mistake in an agreement that would have rendered the agreement impossible to perform
- Used to correct typos or editorial errors that distort the intention of the parties
Misrepresentation
Statement or conduct that may be innocent or fraudulent that induces a person to enter into a contract
- Must be about a material matter
- False statement must be a statement of fact and not opinion
- Statement made before contract entered into
Result of misrepresentation:
Voidable at the option of the injured party
Must rescind or lose the right if they accept benefits under the contract
Rescission
revocation of a contract or agreement
- Only possible if innocent or injured party relied on false statement
Three types:
- Innocent - recission only
- Negligent - recission and damages
- Fraudulent - recission and damages
*remedy depends on type of misrepresentation
Innocent Misrepresentation
false statement of a material fact made by a party that honestly believed the fact to be true
- Courts attempt to return parties back to original position before they entered into the contract
Negligent Misrepresentation
Statements that are sufficiently reckless but not quite innocent nor fraudulent
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
- false statement of fact made by a person who knows, or should know, that is false
- Made with the intention of deceiving another
Deceit
tort that arises when a party suffers damage by acting upon a false representation made by a party with the intention of deceiving the other
Contractual vs. tort remedy:
Contract - rescission is a contractual remedy and used if courts can restore parties to position they were before entering into the contract
Tort of deceit - allows for damages and can award punitive damages
- Deceit:
– Made knowingly
– Without belief in its truth
– Recklessly or carelessly without regard for its truth
Misrepresentation by Non-Disclosure
Contracting party under no obligation to disclose material facts to other contracting party
Exceptions by Non-Disclosure
Certain types of relationships or contracts i.e. contracts of utmost good faith - contracts with special trust or confidence between the parties
Active concealment of facts
Partial disclosure of facts has effect of rendering the part disclosed as false
Undue Influence
state of affairs whereby a person is so influenced by another that the person’s judgement is not his or her own
- Not in a fair bargaining position
- Contract voidable, if dominated party acts to avoid contract as soon as they are free of dominating influence
- Two different scenarios - special relationship exists OR special relationship does not exist
If special relationship exists, undue influence onus shifts to dominant party to prove otherwise
Examples: lawyer/client; doctor/patient; trustee/beneficiary; parent-child; spiritual advisor/faithful adherent
Does not apply to spousal relationship
No undue influence if:
Agreement was fair and reasonable given circumstances
Full disclosure made prior to the formation of contract
Weaker party was free to seek independent legal advice
Contract is voidable at option of weaker party
Duress
threat of injuring or imprisonment for the purpose of requiring another to enter into a contract or carry out some act
-Threat can be to person directly or to persons family
-Threat of violence to person and not person’s goods
-Contract is voidable at option of person once they come out from under duress