Ch 4 - Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials Flashcards

1
Q

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA)

A

• “Dog-bone” geometry: tensile stress at middle of sample → more reproducible fracture
• Instrumentation
1 . Grips/activator (holds sample, moves grip)
2. Load cell (records instantaneous load)
3. Extensometer (records instantaneous length)
4. Computer (converts signals to σ-ε curve)

  • Tensile, compressive, creep and stress relaxation tests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

General σ-ε curves (∀ material)

A

I. Ceramic: linear, steep slope (\elastic deformation, stronger bonds)
II. Metal (linear, then inverted parabola) = better for loads b/c ductile and more \plastic deformation
III. Semi-crystalline polymer (linear, then upward curl)
IV. Elastomer (logarithmic, then upward curl)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Engineering stress

A

σ = F⊥ / A_o
where A_o = init. CSA
* Meas. in Pa
** Engr. assumes neglig. change in size during testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Engineering strain

A

ε = (L_i − L_o) / L_o

  • Dimensionless
    • Engr. assumes neglig. change in size during testing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Shear testing

A

Produces forces // to top and bottom faces of sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Shear stress

A

τ = F_(||) / A_o

* F_|| = shear force, can cause sample defor. of angle θ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Shear strain

A

γ=tan⁡(θ)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Torsion forces

A

Twists cylindrical specimen to cause deformation of angle φ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hooke’s law

A

σ = Eε

where E = \elastic modulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Elastic modulus

A

“E” = linear slope of stress-strain curve

  • Meas. in MPa
    • Stronger interatomic bonds = ↓ defor. = ↑ E (∴ more energy to separate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Elastic deformation

A

Linear stress/strain relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Shear modulus (modulus of rigidity)

A

“G” = slope of τ-γ curve in elastic region

s.t. τ = Gγ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Transverse strain

A

ε_t = Δd /d_o

* Subsequential contraction ⊥ to axial tension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Poisson’s ratio

A

ν = −ε_t / ε_a

* Dimensionless, must be [+]!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elastic & Rigid Moduli

A

E = 2G (1 + ν)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

direction dependence

A

[polymers]
• along axis: 1 ° covalent bonds, mech prop’s similar to metals/ceramics
• else: 2 ° forces dominate, reduces mech prop’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Plastic deformation

A

• Permanent, sample never completely returns to original shape
• Non-linear portion of stress/strain curve
* Does not follow Hooke’s law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Yield strength

A

“σ_y” = stress end of elastic region (start plastic defor.)

  • Draw 0.2% offset line (0.002) on x-axis, // to elastic portion
    • Key design param. b/c end of elasticity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Yield point strain

A

“ε_yp” = strain at end of elastic region

* Draw 0.2% offset line (0.002) on x-axis, // to elastic portion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS)

A

[crystalline e.g. metals/ceramics]
“σ_UTS” = necking of specimen
∴ no longer uniform strain across entire specimen, only defor. at necking area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Fracturing strength

A

“σ_f” = stress at fracture
* after onset of necking, ↓ stress to cause further plastic defor.
∴ σ_frac < σ_UTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Ductility

A

Ability of material to deform plastically before breaking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Brittleness

A
  • Mat’ls w/ low ductility

* Fracture w/ little plastic deformation e.g. ceramics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

% ELongation

A

% EL = (L_f − L_o) / L_o ∗100

where “o” = initial, “f” = fracture

25
Q

% Area Reduction

A

% AR = (A_o − A_f) / A_o ∗100

where “o” = initial, “f” = fracture

26
Q

Plastic defor.: polymers

A

• Chains become oriented w/ direction of load
• Resist defor. along axes b/c 1 ° interxns ∴ specimen elongation along ENTIRE gauge length (not just necked area, like metals)
• Before frac, signif ↑ σ neces. (b/c overcoming 1 ° bonds within aligned chains) → upward curl
* Complex b/c ∀ grain randomly oriented
** Depends on testing envir e.g. ↑ Temp, ↓ strain rate ∴ E ↓, strength ↓, ductility ↑

27
Q

Elasticity

A
  • Stretch bonds, return to normal length after load removed

* Char. only of \elastomers

28
Q

Elastomers

A

• Allow large recoverable strains at low stress levels
• Subset of polymers e.g. rubber
• Amorphous in unstressed state: coiled chains w/ nearly free bond rotations about backbone
* b/c the chains are crosslinked, chains cannot slide past each other ∴ no plastic defor.
** Above T_g, tensile force allows uncoiling of chains/alignment along axis (but NOT sliding) → increased entropy ∴ favors original state (like springs)
** would NOT strengthen an elastomer, b/c want to maintain elasticity

29
Q

Resolved shear stress

A

[metals/crys. ceramics]
τ_r = σ cos⁡(ϕ) cos⁡(λ)
where ϕ = Normal ⊥ to slip plane and λ = angle of slip dir. (both w.r.t vertical)

30
Q

Critical Resolved Shear Stress (CRSS)

A

[metals/crys. ceramics]
“τ_crss” = amount of shear stress in slip plane to initiate slip
* Factor in determining σ_y of material
** Slip occurs if τ_crss achieved in LEAST favorably aligned grain

31
Q

Processing polymers: Heating

A

• Grain growth favored at high T
∴ faster cooling → more, smaller grains • More, small grains LESS likely to be aligned
→ Reduce likelihood of slip ∴ STRONGER, σ_y ↑

32
Q

Processing polymers: Additives

A
  • Smaller atom can sit in compressive region around edge defect and cancel lattice strain
  • Driving force ↓ ∴ slip ↓
33
Q

strain rate

A

Faster, higher strain = less time to rearrange chains along axis of loading (in neck region) ∴ ↓ defor.

34
Q

Plastic deformation:

Semi-crystalline Polymers/Elastomers (molecular level)

A
  • Semi…polymers = spherulites → plastic defor. = interxns b/w lamellae & amorph. regions
    1 . Tie chains extend, lamellae slide past each other
    2. Lamellae reorient s.t. chain folds align along axis of loading
    3. Blocks of crystalline phases separate (break 2 ° bonds)
    4. Blocks and tie molec’s extend, oriented along axis of applied tensile force (1 ° covalent bonds still intact, until fracture)
  • High force necessary to overcome tie molec/covalent bonds
    ** Any changes that inhibit chain motion (need higher energy to overcome): ↑ σ_y, ↓ ductility
35
Q

1 ° v. 2 ° bonds

A

1 ° = crosslinking (when broken → fracture)
2 ° = % X-talinity
* also ↑ MW

=> ↓ chain sliding, ↑ σ_y, ↓ ductility

36
Q

Ductile fracture

A

“cone shape” = plastic deformation prior to breaking
• Crack propagation is slow and stable
• Preferred mode of failure (b/c warning signs from shape change)

37
Q

Brittle fracture

A
  • Little/no plastic deformation (less slip)

* Flat fracture surface (little warning)

38
Q

Charpy and Izod impact tests

A

Measures impact energy and determines D2B transition temp. (when mat’l fractures brittle-y)

39
Q

Polymer crazing

A

Network of fine cracks on surface (⊥ to tensile stress), but CAN support some load

40
Q

Stress raisers

A

• Small flaws which ↑ localized stress → crazes
• e.g. notches, sharp corners and pores
* More signif. for brittle mat’l b/c plastic defor. ↓ localized stress

41
Q

Creep

A

• Plastic deformation of sample under constant (tensile) load (ε) over time
• 1 °, 2 ° (\SS creep rate), 3 °
• Key param: \SS creep rate and \time to rupture “t_r”
* must be greater than T_g to have viscous effects
** if ↑ Temp OR ↑ σ → then rate ε ↑ , t_r ↓

42
Q

Primary creep

A

↑ ε w.r.t time, while creep rate (slope) ↓

* due to repositioning of defects e.g. dislocations

43
Q

Secondary creep

A

• Linear relationship b/w creep & ε (typ. longest period)
* SS creep rate (dε/dt = 0)

44
Q

Tertiary creep

A
  • Gross defects inside mat’l

* e.g. GB separ, cracks/voids → rapid elongation to mat’l failure

45
Q

Molecular causes of creep: Metals

A
  • GB sliding
  • Migration of vacancies (esp. at high Temp) → \stress-induced vacancy diffusion
  • \dislocation climb
46
Q

Stress-induced vacancy diffusion

A
  • Extra vacancies due to loading (⊥ to axis of loading)
  • Vacancies migrate // to axis of loading
  • Atoms move in opp. direction
47
Q

Nabarro-Herring creep

A

Atomic diffusion opp. of \stress-induced vacancy diffusion → elongation of grain along axis of applied stress

48
Q

Coble creep

A

Vacancies migrate along GB (than through bulk of grain)

49
Q

Dislocation climb

A

Dislocation moves 1 atomic spacing by diffusion of entire row of vacancies to extra partial plane of edge dislocation

50
Q

Molecular causes of creep: Ceramics

A

• GB sliding = main microstructural rearrangement

* More resistant to creep b/c electroneutrality

51
Q

Molecular causes of creep: Polymers

A

• Chain sliding in amorphous regions via viscous flow
• % X-talinity and temp (w.r.t T_g)
→ ↑ % X-tal → creep ↓ b/c less amorphous
→ Below T_g, NO CREEP b/c chains cannot rotate/slide

52
Q

Stress relaxation

A

[polymers]
↓ stress over time under constant strain
* Similar to creep, depends on % X-talinity and temp (above T_g)

53
Q

Fatigue fracture

A

• Failure due to repeated loading/dislocations, at stresses signif. less than σ_UTS tensile/yield strengths
• Brittle, little plastic deformation (even in ductile materials)
* Fatigue → ↑ # dislocations → \crack initiation (high σ) → \crack propagation (↑ in size ∀ successive loading cycle) → failure (rapid)

54
Q

Fatigue life

A

• N_f = N_i + N_p
where N_i = # cycles at crack initiation & N_p = # cycles at propagation to critical size for failure
• ↑ σ or \stress raisers → # cycles to failure ↓ (faster)
* Biodegradable mat’ls = more flaws and pores

55
Q

Corrosion fatigue

A

Failure due to cyclic stress + chem attack

56
Q

How to improve mechanical properties

A

Reduce mvmt of dislocations/slip OR chain sliding

*Polycrystalline mat’l gen’lly stronger b/c GB discourage dislocation mvmt (smaller grains = more GB/vol = stronger)

57
Q

Methods to improve mech prop’s: Additives

A
  • [metals] \alloys: reduce lattice strain

* [polymers] \fillers: strength ↑ by acting as crosslinks

58
Q

Methods to improve mech prop’s: Processing

A

• Polycrystalline, quick cooling → more GB/vol (smaller GB) ∴ stronger (higher yield strength) b/c less likely for grains to align (less suscep. to shear stress)