Ch 2 Flashcards
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Are typically anecdotal Don’t allow us to infer causation. con for Case studies
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
con for Case studies
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Can help predict behavior pro for Correlational design
Are typically anecdotal Don’t allow us to infer causation. con for Case studies
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
pro for Correlational design
Are typically anecdotal Don’t allow us to infer causation. con for Case studies
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Don’t allow to infer causation con for Correlational design
Can help predict behavior pro for Correlational design
Are typically anecdotal Don’t allow us to infer causation. con for Case studies
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
con for Correlational design
Can help predict behavior pro for Correlational design
Are typically anecdotal Don’t allow us to infer causation. con for Case studies
Can provide existence of proofs Allows to study rare or unusual phenomena Can offer insights for later systematic testing pro for Case studies
low in internal validity; doesn’t allow to interfere causation con for Naturalistic observation
high in external validity pro for Naturalistic observation
hunches and snap judgments aren’t always right. Intuitive thinking relies on heuristics leads to mistakes because
Heuristic. mental shortcut or rule of thumb that helps to streamline thinking and make sense of the world.
Daniel Kahneman coined analytical thinking
Analytical thinking. also called System 2 of thinking. It is slow and reflective and has mental effort. It rejects gut hunches when they seem wrong.
Malcolm Gladwell bb. coined intuitive thinking
Intuitive thinking. based on first impressions which are usually accurate. It is quick, reflexive, gut hunches, not much mental effort. Also called System 1 of thinking.
Intuitive and Analytical thinking. What are the two modes of thinking?
prefrontal lobotomies surgical procedures that severs fibers connecting the frontal lobes from the thalamus
50 k. how many Americans received prefrontal lobotomies in the 40s and 50s?
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
pro for Experimental design
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Obtaining random selection this is usually more important than obtaining a large sample
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
this is usually more important than obtaining a large sample
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Nonrandom selection. this is misleading to conclusions
Obtaining random selection this is usually more important than obtaining a large sample
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
this is misleading to conclusions
Obtaining random selection this is usually more important than obtaining a large sample
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
reliable? Valid? When evaluating results from dependent variable or measure. Two questions:
Nonrandom selection. this is misleading to conclusions
Obtaining random selection this is usually more important than obtaining a large sample
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
When evaluating results from dependent variable or measure. Two questions:
Nonrandom selection. this is misleading to conclusions
Obtaining random selection this is usually more important than obtaining a large sample
Random selection. this is crucial if researchers want to generalize results to the broader populations
Self- reports. are surveys that are used to measure people’s opinions and attitudes
Self- report measures. questionnaires that asses variety of characteristics; related to self-reports
Reliability consistency of measurement
Random selection. ensures every person in a population has an equal chance of being chosen to participate
Existence proof demonstration that a given psychological phenomenon can occur
Case study research design that examines people or person in depth over time
Internal validity extent to which we can draw cause and effect inferences from a study
External validity. extent to which we can generate findings to real world settings
Naturalistic observation. Watch behavior in real world settings and unfolds naturally; Understand range of behavior
Can sometimes be low in external validity con for Experimental design
Allow to infer causation High in internal validity pro for Experimental design
Reliability. this applies to interviews and observation data.
this applies to interviews and observation data.
Interrater reliability. extent to which different people who conduct an interview or make behavioral observations, agree on the characteristics they’re measuring.
Reliability. this applies to interviews and observation data.
extent to which different people who conduct an interview or make behavioral observations, agree on the characteristics they’re measuring.
Reliability. this applies to interviews and observation data.
