CH 19 professional issues part A Flashcards
Nurse Practice Act
rules in each state for nurses
-qualifcations for licensure
-nursing titles (NP) that are allowed to be used
-scope of practice (vary state to state! if practice state A and have full practice authority don’t need doc collab. if move to state B, can u practice like state A? need to check state B practice act to know what to do in that state
If i have full practice authority (don’t need doc collab) & I move to state B, can u practice like state A?
need to check state B practice act to know what to do in that state
have 54 different practice acts to fully autonomous to highly restrictive
process of credentialing
-confirms HCP meets regulations in the state where practice is located
-investigates NP’s background is well investigated
-provides practice authority in given healthcare setting
-enables insurance reimbursements
-defines clinical, hospital privileges
NP credentialing process
education
certification
licensure
criminal backvround check (CORI, SORI)
work hx, employment background
natioanl practitioner data bank (malpractice or other actions against NP)
status of clinical or hospital privileges a/s with former employment
DEA number
needed to prescribe controlled substances
schedule 1-5 substances ranked
DEA number
needed to prescribe controlled substances
schedule 1-5 substances ranked
schedule 1 controlled substances
ILLEGAL
no one has this license
herone, MDMA, PCP
schedule 2 controlled substances
legal to prescribe BUT significant abuse potential
morphine, fentanyl, methadone, oxycodone, methylpenidate, anabolic steroids
schedule 3 controlled substances
less abuse potential
teststerone, butalbital (Fioricet) etc
schedule 4 controlled substances
low abuse potential
common sleeping aids (zolpidem (Ambien), short acting benzos, phentermine
schedule 5controlled substances
low abuse relative to schedule 4
few meds like antidiarrheals diphenoxylate/atropine (Lomotil)
beneficence
PCP obligation to help people in need
nonmaleficence
do no harm with or w/o intention
if harm is unavoidable, must minimize harm
autonomy
right of competent person to choose a personal plan of life, action by exercising rights of self determination, independence and freedom
-put my opinions away and provide unbiased info risks and benefits of tx
-i respect pt’s well informed decision
goals of autonomy
-avoid paternalism such as forcing my choice to the pt when given 2 options
autonomy is not an absolute right because
if it interferes with the rights and wellbeing of others
ie: someone has TB in the hospital and refuses to get tx for it. they can be sued and forced to get tx bc they can expose the nurse
if impaired cognitive impaired person, decision making can be deferred to
health care proxy
need sig impairment
competency
ability to exercise rights to give or refuse informed consent
justice
utilitarianism
utility = working well for the most good
-ie: vaccines to avoid illness
veracity
HONEST!
B! fair and unbiased manner
denying antibiotics!!!!!
if give antib, and gets complication like c diff and adverse effects and didn’t need it, can get sued
A. beneficence = helping ppl in need
veracity - to tell the truth
autonomy
informed consent pt side
disclosing info to competent pt who can voluntary choice
-DISCUSS DIRECTLY TO THE PT WHAT HAPPENS IF NO TX HAPPENS
informed consent PCP side
is consent ever presumed?