Ch 19: Breach and remedies Flashcards
remedies
provides for non-breaching party
legal remedy
remedy at law, monetary remedies, same as damages
goal is to make party whole again or to give them the benefit of the bargain (provide profit the party would have made)
most common breach of contract remedy
damages
when do judges go with “make whole again”
early in the contract
when do judges go with “give the party the benefit of their bargain”
late in the contract because the party loses real prospect of profits
compensatory damages
actual out of pocket damages
ex- have a deal to get 1,000,000 to ship letter to LA. Cost of letter is 24. We sue because letter doesn’t get there so compensatory damages would be 24.
consequential damages
loss suffered because of breach
Ex- letter example consequential damages would be 1,000,000
punitive damages
extremely rare. happens when there is a breach along with criminal activity
is a breach of contract wrong?
Legal system says no. Sometimes its cheaper for breaching party to breach and pay damages than to fulfill the contract. Just an economic transaction therefore the breaching party isn’t a criminal
mitigation of damages
a successful contract is where both parties cooperate and get full benefit of their bargain. Contract is “a marriage for a fixed time.” Non breaching party has a duty to not increase the damages of the other party
magenta paint mitigation of duties example
Paint store delivered wrong can of paint to his house - breach of contract. However, bobby can’t dump out the paint because he has a duty to mitigate the damages of the paint store
parker v MGM mitigation of damages example
MGM said parker didn’t attempt to mitigate their damages since she didn’t do a western movie when she didn’t wanna go to australia and just wanted money for original contract. Court ruled in parkers favor
mitigation of damages rules
You have a duty to mitigate the breaching party’s damages as long as:
the new job is in a reasonable location and the same job
equitable remedy
sometimes damages aren’t adequate remedy and they want the other party to perform
specific performance
contract for land is breached- guilty party offers to pay but innocent party just wants land and doesn’t care about money so they want specific performance