Ch 13 BLAW: Consideration Flashcards
Heart of contracts
Consideration- “No cause of action arises from a bare promise”
Element of consideration: Value
money, property, or things of obvious value
LEGAL VALUE
Element of Consideration: promises
People can depend on the promise being fulfilled
LEGAL VALUE
element of consideration: performance
people can’t do things for free
LEGAL VALUE
Element of consideration: forbearance
Hamer V sidway: He forbore drinking, smoking, and other stuff for 10,000. When you forbore something that means there is consideration
LEGAL VALUE
adequacy of consideration
both sides have to provide something of value for there to be consideration
- cost has nothing to do with products value
- courts don’t consider the adequacy of consideration (the accuracy of items value) because its hard to tell what an individual values something at (judges don’t determine value)
-value of items exchanged don’t have to be equal (inequality is profit)
Bargained for exchange
Second element of consideration. Both parties must exchange something of value and have the ability to say yes or no
T/F: in contract law consideration refers to a serious thought that underlies a party’s intent to enter the contract
F
t/F consideration is the serious thought that underlies a party’s intent to enter into a contract
F
T/F- if a promise is made it will be enforced
False- must have additionally have legality and all other components of a contract
When will courts consider differences in value in contracts
When it is an egregious example of people taking advantage of those who can’t take care of their own self-interest
ex- bible selling, old refigerator example (10 annual payments at 18% interest
where is consideration in a contract
on both sides and won’t balance
Why do we have to have consideration in a contract?
Expansion of money supply. Normal money spent expands at 6x while money changing hands in a contract expands at 12-24x. It’s the BEST expansion of money/consideration supply - why judges are so compelled to fix contracts
Preexisting data
agreement that lacks consideration: if you promise to do what one already has a legal duty to do, that doesn’t constitute legally sufficient consideration
ex- masons agree to do job for 100,000, then ask for and sign a contract for 250,000 the contractor only has to pay 100,000 since they already agreed to that amount
past consideration
agreement that lacks consideration: the bargained for exchange element is missing