Ch 18 Flashcards

0
Q

Antitrust laws

A

Laws protecting commerce from unlawful restraints

Objective is to foster competitiom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Business trust

A

Corporations tied themselves together in business trusts
To thwart competition

Form of business organization where trustees hold title
To property for benefit of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sherman Act: section 1

A

Every contract, combination in form of trust or otherwise,
Or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce among
Several states/foreign nations is illegal

Felony punishable by fine or imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sherman Act: section 2

A

Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to, or
Combine or conspire with others to monopolize any
Part of trade/commerce

among states/foreign countries is deemed guilty of felony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Main ways section 1 of Sherman Act differs from section 2

A

Section 1 requires 2 or more persons

Section 2 can be unilateral conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Section 1 cases of Sherman act involve?

Section 2 cases?

A

Section 1: Finding written/oral agreement that leads to a
restraint Of trade

Section 2: cases deal with structure of monopoly that
Already exists in marketplace (misuse of monopoly power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Monopoly

A

Market in which there is single seller or very limited # of

Sellers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Monopoly power

A

Ability of monopoly to dictate what takes place in a given

Market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Market power

A

Power of firm to control market price of its product

Monopoly has greatest degree of market power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Jurisdictional requirements of Sherman Act

A

Restraints that apply to interstate commerce

US nationals abroad that engage in activities that affect
US foreign commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Per se violation

A

Type of anticompetitive agreement that is considered injurious
To public

No need to determine whether it injures market competition
Naturally considered violation of Sherman Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rule of reason

A

Test where court balances positive effects (ex. Economic
Efficiency) of agreement against anticompetitive effects

In antitrust litigation, many practices are analyzed under
Rule of reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Horizontal restraint

A

Any agreement that restrains competition between rival

Firms competing in same market

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Horizontal restraint: Price-fixing agreement

A

Agreement btw competitors to fix prices of products and
Services at certain levels

Per se violation of section 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Horizontal restraint: group boycott

A

Refusal by group of competitors to deal with person or
Firm

Prohibited by the Sherman act, per se violation of section 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Horizontal restraint: Horizontal market division

A

When competitors divide up territories or customers

Per se violation of section 1 of Sherman act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Trade associations

A

Organized to pursue common interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

4 Joint activities of trade associations

A

1 exchange info
2 representation of business interest in front of governmental bodies
3 advertising campaigns
4setting regulatory standards to govern profession/industry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Concentrated industry

A

Industry where large percentage of market sales is controlled
By single firm or small number of firms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Vertical restraint

A

Any restraint on trade created by agreements btw firms at

Different levels in manufacturing and distribution process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How are vertical restraints different from horizontal restraints

A

Vertical restrains encompass entire chain of production

While horizontal restraints occur at same level of operation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Vertically integrated firm

A

Firm that carries out 2 or more functional phases of chain
Of production

(Ex. Manufacture, Distribution and retailing)

22
Q

Vertical restraint: territorial or customer restrictions

A

Manufacturing firm institutes territorial restrictions

Prevents wholesalers or retailers from reselling product to
Certain classes of buyers (competing retailers)

23
Q

Resale price maintenance agreement

A

Agreement btw manufacturer and retailer where manufacturer
Specifies what retail prices of its product must be

Judged under rule of reason whether they violate Sherman
Act

24
Q

Predatory pricing

A

Pricing product below cost with intent to drive competitors
Out of market

Violets section 2 of Sherman act

25
Q

Monopolization 2 elements

A

1 possession of monopoly power in relevant market

2 willful acquisition or maintenance of power as distinguished
From growth or development as consequence of superior
Product, business acumen, historic accident

26
Q

2 elements of relevant market

A

1 relevant product market

2 relevant geographic market

27
Q

Relevant product market

A

Includes products with identical attributes

Ex. Sugar made by different producers

28
Q

Intent requirement (for monopoly power)

A

Evidence firm intentionally engaged in anticompetitive

behavior

29
Q

Unilateral refusals to deal: 2 conditions for violation of section 2

A

1 firm has monopoly power that refuses to deal

2 refusal to deal has anticompetitive effect on market

30
Q

Attempted monopolization

A

Prohibited by section 2, any actions by firm to eliminate
Competition and gain monopoly power

Ex. Engaging in predatory pricing or predatory bidding

31
Q

Predatory bidding

A

Firm deliberately bids up price of inputs to prevent
competitors from obtaining sufficient supplies to manufacture
Products

32
Q

Clayton Act: Section 2 Price Discrimination

A

Setting prices in such a way that 2 competing buyers pay
2 different prices for identical product or service

Ex. Arise from favorable credit terms, discounts, rebates, offsets, allowances, freight charges

33
Q

4 elements required to violate section 2 price discrimination

A

1 seller engaged in interstate commerce
2 goods = same quality
3 sold to 2 or more purchasers
4 effect of price discrimination decreases competition

34
Q

3 statutory defenses to price discrimination

A

1 cost justification

2 meeting the price of competition

3 changing market condition

35
Q

Defense: cost justification

A

Seller can justify price reduction by demonstrating particular
Buyer’s purchases saved seller cost in producing goods

36
Q

Defense meeting price of competition

A

If seller charged lower price in good faith to meet equal low
Price competitor, they won’t be liable

37
Q

Defense changing market condition

A

Sellers can readjust prices to meet realities of market

38
Q

Clayton Act Section 3: Exclusive dealing contract

A

Agreement where seller forbids buyer to purchase products
From seller’s competitors

Violation of section 3 of Clayton act when it harms competition

39
Q

Clayton Act Section 3: Tying Arrangement

A

Agreement btw buyer and seller where buyer of specific
Product/service becomes obligated to purchase additional
Products or services from seller

Violation of section 3 of Clayton act if it decreases competition

40
Q

Clayton Act: Section 7 Mergers

A

Person or business organization can’t hold stock/assets
Or other entity where effect may be to substantially lessen
Competition

41
Q

Market concentration

A

Degree in which small number of firms control large %
Share of relevant market

Determined by calculating percentages held by largest firms
In that market

42
Q

Horizontal mergers

A

Merger between 2 firms that are competing in same
marketplace

If creates entity with large percentage market share it’s
Illegal

43
Q

3 other factors in considering legality of horizontal merger

A

1 overall concentration of relevant product market

2 relevant market’s history in trending toward concentration

3 whether design of merger is to establish market power
Or restrict competition

44
Q

Vertical merger

A

Acquisition by a company at 1 level in marketing chain
Of company at higher or lower level in chain

Ex. Company merging with one of its suppliers or retailers

45
Q

Interlocking directorates

A

Practice of having individuals serve as directors on boards

Of 2 or more companies simultaneously

46
Q

How does section 8 of Clayton act deal with interlocking directorates?

A

No person may be director in 2 or more competing
corporations at same time

If corporation has capital, surplus or undivided profits
aggregating more than $26,161,000 or competitive sales
Of over $2,616,100 (2009 amounts) federal trade commission
Adjusts amounts each year

47
Q

What 2 federal agencies enforce federal antitrust laws

A

US department of Justice (DOJ)

Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

48
Q

Section 5 of Federal Trade Commission Act

A

Covers all anticompetitive behavior including conduct that
Doesn’t violate Sherman Act or Clayton Act

Therefore broader in scope than other antitrust laws

49
Q

what laws can the DOJ and FTC prosecute

A

DOJ can prosecute violations of Sherman Act

FTC and DOJ can both enforce Clayton Act

50
Q

Divestiture

A

Act of selling 1 or more of company’s divisions or parts
(Such as subsidiary or plant)

Often mandated by courts in merger or monopolization
Cases as a remedy

51
Q

FTC has sole authority to enforce violations of

A

Section 5 of Federal Trade Commission Act

52
Q

Treble damages

A

Damages by statute are 3 times amount of what fact finder
Determines is owed

Can be recovered by private plaintiffs in antitrust suits