Ch 10 - Corruption Flashcards
Corruption
conflicts of interest, bribery, illegal gratuities, economic extortion
Illegal payment to public officials or private corporation insiders for preferential treatment
bribery
offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting any thing of value to influence an official act buys influence of the recipient commercial bribery kickbacks bid-rigging schemes
kickback schemes
involve submission of invoices for goods and services that are either overpriced or completely fictitious
involve collusion between employees and vendors
almost always attack the purchasing function of the victim company
diverting business to vendors
-vendor pays the kickbacks to ensure a steady stream of business from the purchasing company
-no incentive to provide quality merch or low price
-almost always leads to overpaying for goods or services
overbilling schemes: employees with approval authority
- vendor submits inflated invoices to the victim company
- overstates the cost of actual goods or services or reflects fictitious sales
- ability to authorize purchases is key to the scheme
overbilling schemes: employees lacking approval authority
- circumvent purchasing controls
- may prepare false vouchers to make it appear that the invoice is legit
- may forge an approval signature or have access to a restricted password in a computerized system
- difficult to detect since the victim company is being attacked from 2 directions
other kickback schemes
discounts are given in exchange for bribes
slush funds
slush funds
funds can be paid from other accounts or paid as “consulting fees”
other side of the transactions
detecting kickbacks
normal controls may not detect kickback schemes
look for price inflation
monitor trends in COGs and services purchased - often start small but increase over time
look for excessive quantities purchased
investigate inventory shortages
look for inferior goods purchased
compare actual to budgeted
preventing kickbacks
assign an employee independent of purchasing to routinely review buying patterns
make sure all contracts have a “right to audit” clause
establish written policies prohibiting employees from soliciting or accepting fits
expressly forbid employees from engaging in an undisclosed personal interest
implement ethics policy
bid-rigging schemes
all bidders are expected to be on an even playing field - bidding on the same specifications
the more power a person has over the bidding process, the more influence he or she can exert over the selection of the winning bid
potential targets include: buyers, contracting officials, engineers and tech reps, quality of produce assurance reps, subcontractor liaison emplyoes
pre-solicitation phase
need recognition schemes-employee of purchasing company convinces the company that a particular project is necessary, has the specifications tailored to the strengths of a particular supplier
trends indicating a need recognition scheme is occurring
higher requirements for stock and inventory levels, writing off large numbers of surplus items to scrap, defining a need that can only be met by a certain supplier, failure to develop a satisfactory list of backup suppliers
specification schemes
specs include: list of elements, materials, dimensions, and other relevant requirements
set the specs to a particular vendor’s capabilities
use “prequalification” procedures to eliminate certain vendors
give a vendor the right to see the specs before his competitors get the specs
the solicitation phase
restricting the pool of vendors frm which to choose
bid pooling
fictitious suppliers
restricting the time for submitting bids
soliciting bids in obscure publications
publicizing the bid during holiday periods
the submission phase
fraud in the sealed bid process
-last bid was submitted is the one that is awarded the contract
-winning bidder finds out what the other competitors are bidding
-winning bidder may see the other competitors’ bids before submitting his bid
gets help on preparing the bid
the phases of bid-rigging
pre-solicitation phase, solicitation phase, submission phase
detection of bid-rigging schemes
look for
unusual bidding patterns, low bids followed by change orders, a very large unexplained price difference among bidders, contractors who big last and repeatedly receive the contract, a predictable rotation of bidders, losing bidders who become subcontractors, vendors with the same address and phone number, fewer bidders than expected for the project, projects that have been split into smaller ones
something of value
cash, promises of future employment, promise of ownership in the supplier’s firm, gifts, payment of credit card bills, loans on very favorable terms, transfers of property
illegal gratuities
given to reward a decision rather than influence it, decision made to benefit a person or company but is not influenced by any sort of payment, may influence future decisions
economic extortion
“pay up or else”
employee demands payment from a vendor in order to make a decision in the vendor’s favor
conflicts of interest
employee, manager, or executive has an undisclosed economic or personal interest in a transaction that adversely affects the company
victim organization is unaware of the employee’s divided loyalties
purchasing & sales schemes
difference between conflict of interest and bribery
in conflict of interest, the fraudster approves the invoice because of his own hidden interest in the vendor
purchasing schemes
overbilling schemes and turnaround schemes
overbilling schemes
bill originates from a real company in which the fraudster has an undisclosed economic or personal interest
fraudster uses influence to ensure the victim company does business with this particular vendor
does not negotiate in good faith or attempt to get the best price for the employer