Categorical Propositions Exam 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Relate Subject terms to predicate terms
(Connecting who or what the sentence is about to what they are doing)

A

Categorical Proposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

represents a person, thing, or concept (What or who the sentence is about)

A

Subject Term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is said about the subject of the sentence

A

Predicate term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

All S are P
No S are P
Some S are P
Some S are not P

A

Four types of categorical propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Word like “All” or “Some” are…

A

quantifier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Links the subject and predicate terms

A

copula

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Always has a subject term that is a noun or noun phrase, a predicate term that is a noun or phrase, with a quantifier (All, no, or some), and a copula linking the subject and predicate terms (Are or are not)

A

standard form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Affirmative quality (“All” or “Some”) or Negative quality (“No” or “Some”) affirms or denies class membership of a categorical proposition

A

quality (categorical propositions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Universal quality (“All” or “No”) or Particular quality (“Some”) of a categorical proposition

A

quantity (categorical proposition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The statement applies to every member of the group it talks about (Applies to terms, not to propositions)

A

Distribution (categorical proposition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A : Universal affirmative (S distributed)
E : Universal negative (S and P distributed)
I : Particular affirmative (S and P undistributed)
O: Particular negative(P distributed)

A

Letter names of the four categorical propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Statements or claims that can be either true or false

A

Propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Two perspectives : Aristotelean and Boolean.

A

Existential import

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Using universal statements “All” or “No” implies that the subject of the statement exists

A

Aristotelian standpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

developed by John Venn to represent the information expressed by categorical propositions

A

Venn Diagram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Something is true because there is nothing there that makes it is false.

A

Vacuously True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Something is wrong because there is nothing to make it true

A

Vacuously False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

drawing a conclusion from one proposition without a lot of steps or complex reasoning. (“All cats have tails” conclusion “Some cats have tails”)

A

Immediate Inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Saying something about an entire group as if it is real but no one knows if it is real or not.

A

Existential fallcy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When the subject and predicate switch places

A

Conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When the quality (Affirmative or negative) is changed and the predicate term is replace with its complement it is…

A

Observsion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When the subject and predicate switch places and replace each with its term compliment. (All horses are animals; all non-animals are non-horses)

A

Contraposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When the subject and predicate switch places (No cats are dogs; No dogs are cats)

A

Converse statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

when the converse of an A,E,I, or O statement is mistakenly assumed to be true when it has invalid logic.

A

Fallacy of illicit conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

everything that doesn’t belong to a specific set within a larger set of things. It includes all the elements that are not in that set.

A

Class complement

26
Q

the exact opposite of the term (All cats are mammals; All cats are non-mammals)

A

Term complement

27
Q

If a then b -> If not b then not A

A

The contrapositive of a given statement

28
Q

When someone incorrectly switches the subject and the predicate of a statement in a contraposition leading to an invalid argument.

A

Fallacy of Illicit contraposition

29
Q

Illustrates the relationship of mutually contradictory pairs of categorical propositions. If one is true the other is automatically false. (If all Cats are Black, Then none of the Cats are not Black)

A

Modern square of opposition

30
Q

opposite truth value (A-0 and E-I)

A

contradictory relation

31
Q

At least one of the propositions is false (A-E) one of them is false

A

contrary relation

32
Q

At least one of the propositions is true (I-O) one of them must be true

A

subcontrary relation

33
Q

The truth trickles down from A-I and E-O
The falsity trickles up from I-A and O-E

A

subalternation relation

34
Q
A

illicit contrary

35
Q
A

illicit subcontrary

36
Q
A

illicit subalternation

37
Q
A

conditionally valid

38
Q

Statements that incorporate forms of the verb “to be” other than “are” and “are not: or omit it entirely need to have the implicit “are” or “are not” made explicit.
Ex: Some dogs would rather bark than bite
Some dogs ARE ANIMALS THAT would rather bark than bite

A

Nonstandard verbs

39
Q

Propositions that make assertions about singular nouns can be transformed into universals by means of a “parameter”

A

singular propositions

40
Q

A phrase that affects the number of the subject term without changing its meaning.

Ex: Socrates is mortal
ALL PEOPLE IDENTICAL TO Socrates are PEOPLE WHO ARE mortal

A

parameter

41
Q

Implicit quantifies must be made explicit. to determine the quantity you must be sensitive to the most probable meaning of the statement.

A

unexpressed quantifiers

42
Q
A

nonstandard quantifiers

43
Q
A

conditional statements

44
Q

Propositions using the words “Only” “None but” “None except etc.

A

exclusive propositions

45
Q
A

exceptive propositions

46
Q

What does A distribute?

A

The Subject

47
Q

What does E distribute?

A

The Subject and the Predicate

48
Q

What does I distribute?

A

Neither the subject nor the predicate

49
Q

What does O distribute?

A

The Predicate

50
Q

What does Universal quantity distribute?

A

Subjects

51
Q

What do Negative quantity distribute?

A

Predicates

52
Q

Arguments that are from the boolean standpoint are valid regardless of whether they refer to existing things.

A

Unconditionally Valid

53
Q

When you change the quality (affirmative or negative) and replace the predicate with its term compliment (All horses are animals; no horses are non-animals)

A

Obversion

54
Q

A false A proposition is equal to an…

A

O proposition

55
Q

A false O proposition is equal to an…

A

A proposition

56
Q

A false E proposition is equal to an…

A

I proposition

57
Q

A false I proposition is equal to an…

A

E proposition

58
Q

adverbs “Where” “Anywhere” “nowhere”) may be translated using the word “places”
Ex” Wherever you hide, they will find you and they will tax you”

A

Spatial adverbs

59
Q

adverbs “When” “Whenever” “Always” may be translated using “times”
Ex: He is never clean shaven

A

Temporal adverbs

60
Q

Pronouns (“Who” “Whoever” “Anyone”) may be translated using “people”

A

Personal Pronouns

61
Q

Pronouns (“What” “Whatever” “Anything”) may be translated using “Things”

A

Impersonal Pronouns