Casualty Insurance: General Concepts Flashcards
Explain casualty insurance
People and businesses purchase casualty insurance to protect themselves against liabilities and to reimburse the cost of paying legal settlements. Specifically, casualty insurance protects against civil wrongs, also known as torts, which involve the private (non-contractual) relationships between parties
Wikipedia: Casualty insurance, often equated to liability insurance, is insurance not directly concerned with life insurance, health insurance, or property insurance. It is mainly liability coverage of an individual or organization for negligent acts or omissions.[1]
Casualty insurance protects against (1) _____, also known as (2) _____, which involve the private (non-contractual) relationships between parties.
- civil wrongs
2. torts
What are the 2 types of torts coverable by casualty insurance?
- Bodily or Personal Injury to another person that results from the insured’s alleged failure to take proper care
- Damage to another person’s personal property that results from the insured’s alleged failure to take proper care
True or False
Casualty insurance does not protect against criminal acts, which are prosecuted by authorities at the state and federal level.
True - A person or business convicted of a criminal act may pay fines that are not covered by insurance.
Proximate cause
is a natural and continuous action that results in damage or loss
An action cannot be considered a proximate cause unless:
- It occurs as a chain or sequence unbroken by independent factors
- The loss would not have occurred if the action had been absent
ex. Assume, for instance, that a fire causes structural damage to a department store and the owner fails to exercise proper care in making repairs. The damage then leads to structural collapse that injures a shopper, who then sues the store and receives a settlement. The fire would be considered a proximate cause because it set off an unbroken chain of events that led to a loss (the settlement). Next, assume a thunderstorm occurs shortly after the structural damage. Water seeps into the store, which damages some of the merchandise. The fire is not the proximate cause of the damaged merchandise because the sequence of events was interrupted by an intervening cause (the thunderstorm) whose occurrence was not caused by the fire.
Negligence
Negligence is an unintentional tort, and is caused by the insured’s accidental failure to exercise reasonable care to prevent injury or damages.
In most cases, casualty insurance does not cover _____.
intentional torts
The insured cannot be held liable for damages unless the accuser can prove negligence, which requires establishing what 4 factors?
- A legal duty must be owed. The insured is legally obligated to act in a reasonable and prudent manner to protect the safety and property of another person.
- The legal duty owed must have been breached. The insured may owe different levels of protection to different people. These different levels are known as a degree or standard of care.
- The insured’s failure to act must have been the proximate cause of the act.
- There must be an actual injury or property damage.
Contributory Negligence Law
According to the contributory negligence law, if a person has sustained damages or injury through some fault of his own, he cannot hold another party liable, even if they share responsibility for those damages.
Comparative Negligence Law
According to the comparative negligence law, if a person has sustained damages or injury due to his own fault and the fault of a separate party, the court will assess and award damages based on the level of responsibility held by each party.
ex. Consider, for instance, a person who is injured while shopping at a store. The court may rule that the person is 20% responsible for his injuries and the store is 80% responsible. Consequently, the person would receive 80% of the possible damage settlement.
What are the 5 defenses people and organizations can use against accusations of negligence?
- Assumption of risk
- Intervening cause
- Last clear chance defense
- Contributory negligence
- Comparative negligence
Assumption of risk
The injured party has no right to collect damages if he knew the risks beforehand and still placed himself in the situation.
Intervening cause
The accused is not liable if the damage or injury was caused by an intervening cause beyond his control.
Last clear chance defense
The injured party has no right to collect damages if he had the last clear chance to circumvent the loss and ignored it.
Contributory negligence
The injured party cannot hold another party liable if his injuries were partly his own fault.
Comparative negligence
The injured party is only entitled to part of the damages if he was partly responsible for his injuries.
What are the damages that can be required to pay when a party is found liable?
punitive and or compensatory, which includes special damages (fixed expenses such as medical bills) and general damages (non-economic expenses such as pain and suffering)